The Digital Clock and Recall can predict functional impairment in individuals with and without cognitive impairment and triage those in need of further assessment

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marissa C Ciesla, Claudio Toro‐Serey, Ali Jannati, Joyce Rios Gomes‐Osman, Russel Banks, John Showalter, Sean Tobyne, Alvaro Pascual‐Leone
{"title":"The Digital Clock and Recall can predict functional impairment in individuals with and without cognitive impairment and triage those in need of further assessment","authors":"Marissa C Ciesla, Claudio Toro‐Serey, Ali Jannati, Joyce Rios Gomes‐Osman, Russel Banks, John Showalter, Sean Tobyne, Alvaro Pascual‐Leone","doi":"10.1002/alz.089288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionEvaluation of functional dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) is necessary for dementia diagnosis. ADL and iADL questionnaires are typically employed, but with progressive cognitive impairment, a care partner must step in to assist with these tests, causing logistical burdens. Pre‐screening tools that triage patients in need of formal functional assessment would optimize clinical workflows. Here we evaluated whether the Linus Health Digital Clock and Recall (DCRTM), a brief automatically‐scored test of multiple cognitive domains, could concurrently predict functional impairment among individuals with and without cognitive impairment.MethodsWe collected data from 922 participants in the Bio‐Hermes‐001 multi‐site study (age mean±SD = 72±6.6; 57% female; years of education mean±SD = 15±2.71; primary language English), classified as cognitively unimpaired (n = 402), mild cognitively impaired (n = 298), or probable Alzheimer’s dementia (n = 242) based on clinical consensus and neuropsychological evaluation. We split participants, each including 2000 speech and drawing DCR metrics and age, into training (80%) and test (20%) sets, ensuring equal rates of functional impairment across sets (Functional Activities Questionnaire ≥ 6; 25% rate). We performed recursive feature elimination on 10‐fold cross‐validated random forests (5 repetitions) on the training set to identify the best model and feature set. Model performance was evaluated on the test set.ResultsThe optimal model (500 features) classified functional impairment with 0.77 sensitivity, 0.82 specificity, 0.90 negative predictive value (NPV), 0.61 positive predictive value (PPV), 0.86 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and 0.80 accuracy. The most predictive features were the duration of speech during recall and the placement of clock components.ConclusionThe DCR, a brief digital cognitive assessment with automatic scoring that can be completed in primary‐care settings, can also be used to identify individuals in need of further evaluation and engagement of care partners as informants. The high NPV can reassure healthcare professionals when no further assessment of ADLs and iADLs is indicated. These results also enable identifying care partners who are likely to benefit from receiving personalized recommendations or training to assist them in caregiving tasks and alleviate caregiver burden.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionEvaluation of functional dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) is necessary for dementia diagnosis. ADL and iADL questionnaires are typically employed, but with progressive cognitive impairment, a care partner must step in to assist with these tests, causing logistical burdens. Pre‐screening tools that triage patients in need of formal functional assessment would optimize clinical workflows. Here we evaluated whether the Linus Health Digital Clock and Recall (DCRTM), a brief automatically‐scored test of multiple cognitive domains, could concurrently predict functional impairment among individuals with and without cognitive impairment.MethodsWe collected data from 922 participants in the Bio‐Hermes‐001 multi‐site study (age mean±SD = 72±6.6; 57% female; years of education mean±SD = 15±2.71; primary language English), classified as cognitively unimpaired (n = 402), mild cognitively impaired (n = 298), or probable Alzheimer’s dementia (n = 242) based on clinical consensus and neuropsychological evaluation. We split participants, each including 2000 speech and drawing DCR metrics and age, into training (80%) and test (20%) sets, ensuring equal rates of functional impairment across sets (Functional Activities Questionnaire ≥ 6; 25% rate). We performed recursive feature elimination on 10‐fold cross‐validated random forests (5 repetitions) on the training set to identify the best model and feature set. Model performance was evaluated on the test set.ResultsThe optimal model (500 features) classified functional impairment with 0.77 sensitivity, 0.82 specificity, 0.90 negative predictive value (NPV), 0.61 positive predictive value (PPV), 0.86 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and 0.80 accuracy. The most predictive features were the duration of speech during recall and the placement of clock components.ConclusionThe DCR, a brief digital cognitive assessment with automatic scoring that can be completed in primary‐care settings, can also be used to identify individuals in need of further evaluation and engagement of care partners as informants. The high NPV can reassure healthcare professionals when no further assessment of ADLs and iADLs is indicated. These results also enable identifying care partners who are likely to benefit from receiving personalized recommendations or training to assist them in caregiving tasks and alleviate caregiver burden.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信