Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup

Gil D. Rabinovici, David S. Knopman, Javier Arbizu, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Kevin J. Donohoe, Oskar Hansson, Peter Herscovitch, Phillip H. Kuo, Jennifer H. Lingler, Satoshi Minoshima, Melissa E. Murray, Julie C. Price, Stephen P. Salloway, Christopher J. Weber, Maria C. Carrillo, Keith A. Johnson
{"title":"Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup","authors":"Gil D. Rabinovici, David S. Knopman, Javier Arbizu, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Kevin J. Donohoe, Oskar Hansson, Peter Herscovitch, Phillip H. Kuo, Jennifer H. Lingler, Satoshi Minoshima, Melissa E. Murray, Julie C. Price, Stephen P. Salloway, Christopher J. Weber, Maria C. Carrillo, Keith A. Johnson","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Alzheimer&rsquo;s Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. <b>Methods:</b> The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as \"rarely appropriate,\" \"uncertain,\" or \"appropriate.\" Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand-alone modalities. <b>Results:</b> For amyloid PET, 7 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 2 as uncertain, and 8 as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, 5 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 6 as uncertain, and 6 as rarely appropriate. <b>Conclusion:</b> AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Alzheimer’s Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. Methods: The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as "rarely appropriate," "uncertain," or "appropriate." Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand-alone modalities. Results: For amyloid PET, 7 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 2 as uncertain, and 8 as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, 5 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 6 as uncertain, and 6 as rarely appropriate. Conclusion: AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease.

更新淀粉样蛋白和Tau PET的适当使用标准:来自阿尔茨海默病协会和核医学和分子成像工作组协会的报告
阿尔茨海默病协会和核医学与分子成像学会召集了一个多学科工作组,以更新淀粉样正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的适当使用标准(AUC),并制定tau PET的AUC。方法:工作组确定了指导临床淀粉样蛋白/tau PET系统文献综述的关键研究问题。在此综述的基础上,工作组制定了17种可能考虑淀粉样蛋白或tau PET的临床方案。采用一种改进的德尔菲方法,根据共识将每个场景评为“很少合适”、“不确定”或“合适”。将淀粉样蛋白和tau PET作为独立模式分别进行评分。结果:对于淀粉样蛋白PET, 7种情况被评为合适,2种情况被评为不确定,8种情况被评为很少合适。对于tau PET, 5种情况被评为合适,6种情况被评为不确定,6种情况被评为很少合适。结论:淀粉样蛋白和tau PET的AUC为这些技术在阿尔茨海默病诊断和治疗领域的临床应用提供了专家建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信