Mireille De Graeuwe, Benjamin Dumont, Kevin Maréchal
{"title":"SErious Game for AgroEcology (SEGAE): How much can be delivered with a 4-hour lesson?","authors":"Mireille De Graeuwe, Benjamin Dumont, Kevin Maréchal","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>European agriculture faces numerous challenges, and agroecology has emerged as a promising alternative. To facilitate this transition, integrating agroecology into agricultural education is crucial. However, its systemic and interdisciplinary nature makes it difficult to teach and learn. To support teaching, the “SErious Game for AgroEcology” (SEGAE) was developed. SEGAE is a simulated mixed crop–livestock farm model in which players can learn by doing.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to (1) assess the effectiveness of SEGAE in a 4-h lesson led by a single teacher, (2) examine the potential added value of classroom-based lessons compared to a fully online setting, and (3) analyze how students from different disciplinary backgrounds acquire agroecological knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>METHOD</h3><div>A teacher conducted three identical 4-h lessons using SEGAE, involving undergraduate bioengineering students from four specializations. One lesson was conducted fully online, while the other two were classroom-based. Each lesson included theory, game sessions, and pre- and post-surveys to assess knowledge acquisition. Student scores were converted to percentages and analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired <em>t</em>-tests, and multiple regressions. Feedback on the learning experience was collected through 36 statements related to ‘flow’ – the level of immersion in a task. A two-factor ANOVA and a Tukey test were performed. A PCA explored the flow-knowledge acquisition relationship.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The results show that students significantly increased their knowledge in agroecology. No significant difference between the online and classroom-based lessons on knowledge acquisition could be demonstrated. However, a negative effect was found between the online session and the reported flow levels. A striking result was the increased performance of students upon answering open-ended questions, which required them to articulate knowledge. Moreover, most students enjoyed the game (91 %) and believed it enhanced their agroecology knowledge (92 %).</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>SEGAE, in a 4-h lesson with a single teacher, is a relevant tool for teaching agroecology, achieving comparable results in knowledge acquisition and flow to a longer workshop. The impact is particularly evident in open-ended questions. The study provides complementary evidence of a link between the increase in absolute knowledge and two factors of flow: feedback and social interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104212"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24003627","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
European agriculture faces numerous challenges, and agroecology has emerged as a promising alternative. To facilitate this transition, integrating agroecology into agricultural education is crucial. However, its systemic and interdisciplinary nature makes it difficult to teach and learn. To support teaching, the “SErious Game for AgroEcology” (SEGAE) was developed. SEGAE is a simulated mixed crop–livestock farm model in which players can learn by doing.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to (1) assess the effectiveness of SEGAE in a 4-h lesson led by a single teacher, (2) examine the potential added value of classroom-based lessons compared to a fully online setting, and (3) analyze how students from different disciplinary backgrounds acquire agroecological knowledge.
METHOD
A teacher conducted three identical 4-h lessons using SEGAE, involving undergraduate bioengineering students from four specializations. One lesson was conducted fully online, while the other two were classroom-based. Each lesson included theory, game sessions, and pre- and post-surveys to assess knowledge acquisition. Student scores were converted to percentages and analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and multiple regressions. Feedback on the learning experience was collected through 36 statements related to ‘flow’ – the level of immersion in a task. A two-factor ANOVA and a Tukey test were performed. A PCA explored the flow-knowledge acquisition relationship.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The results show that students significantly increased their knowledge in agroecology. No significant difference between the online and classroom-based lessons on knowledge acquisition could be demonstrated. However, a negative effect was found between the online session and the reported flow levels. A striking result was the increased performance of students upon answering open-ended questions, which required them to articulate knowledge. Moreover, most students enjoyed the game (91 %) and believed it enhanced their agroecology knowledge (92 %).
SIGNIFICANCE
SEGAE, in a 4-h lesson with a single teacher, is a relevant tool for teaching agroecology, achieving comparable results in knowledge acquisition and flow to a longer workshop. The impact is particularly evident in open-ended questions. The study provides complementary evidence of a link between the increase in absolute knowledge and two factors of flow: feedback and social interaction.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.