Francesco Cerasoli, Barbara Fiasca, Mattia Di Cicco, Emma Galmarini, Ilaria Vaccarelli, Stefano Mammola, Florian Malard, Fabio Stoch, Diana M. P. Galassi
{"title":"EGCop: An Expert-Curated Occurrence Dataset of European Groundwater-Dwelling Copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda)","authors":"Francesco Cerasoli, Barbara Fiasca, Mattia Di Cicco, Emma Galmarini, Ilaria Vaccarelli, Stefano Mammola, Florian Malard, Fabio Stoch, Diana M. P. Galassi","doi":"10.1111/geb.13953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>Subterranean biodiversity is increasingly threatened by multiple intertwined anthropogenic impacts, including habitat loss, pollution, overexploitation of resources, biological invasions and climate change. Worryingly, subterranean biodiversity is still poorly represented in conservation agendas, also due to persisting gaps in our knowledge of the organisms thriving in the often-secluded and difficult-to-access subterranean ecosystems. This is even more apparent for small-sized (body size < 1 mm) groundwater-dwelling metazoans, among which copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda) represent the dominant group in terms of both species richness and biomass.</p>\n \n <p>We present a dataset including 6986 occurrence records of 588 species/subspecies of European obligate groundwater-dwelling copepods. We curated all records to make their taxonomy consistent with the current systematics of Copepoda, while assessing uncertainty in the geographic coordinates by coupling in-depth web and literature searches with GIS analyses. We suggest the data provided can be used to explore a range of eco-evolutionary questions—from the drivers of the distribution of groundwater fauna to the assembly of groundwater communities—as well as to prompt the conservation of groundwater biodiversity and more.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Types of Variables Contained</h3>\n \n <p>Occurrence records of groundwater-dwelling copepods, with details about specimen taxonomy, source of the record, occurrence locality and habitat type.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Spatial Location and Grain</h3>\n \n <p>Geographical Europe (including western Russian Federation), along with Turkey and Georgia. Occurrence records were assigned projected geographic coordinates (EPSG:3035) at 100 m resolution but with varying spatial uncertainty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period and Grain</h3>\n \n <p>1907–2017.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa and Level of Measurement</h3>\n \n <p>Crustacea: Copepoda. Most records have species-level identification, while some of them are identified at the subspecies level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Software Format</h3>\n \n <p>Comma-separated values file (.csv) and Excel file (.xlsx), with UTF-8 encoding and meta-data provided following the Darwin Core standard.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13953","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13953","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motivation
Subterranean biodiversity is increasingly threatened by multiple intertwined anthropogenic impacts, including habitat loss, pollution, overexploitation of resources, biological invasions and climate change. Worryingly, subterranean biodiversity is still poorly represented in conservation agendas, also due to persisting gaps in our knowledge of the organisms thriving in the often-secluded and difficult-to-access subterranean ecosystems. This is even more apparent for small-sized (body size < 1 mm) groundwater-dwelling metazoans, among which copepods (Crustacea: Copepoda) represent the dominant group in terms of both species richness and biomass.
We present a dataset including 6986 occurrence records of 588 species/subspecies of European obligate groundwater-dwelling copepods. We curated all records to make their taxonomy consistent with the current systematics of Copepoda, while assessing uncertainty in the geographic coordinates by coupling in-depth web and literature searches with GIS analyses. We suggest the data provided can be used to explore a range of eco-evolutionary questions—from the drivers of the distribution of groundwater fauna to the assembly of groundwater communities—as well as to prompt the conservation of groundwater biodiversity and more.
Main Types of Variables Contained
Occurrence records of groundwater-dwelling copepods, with details about specimen taxonomy, source of the record, occurrence locality and habitat type.
Spatial Location and Grain
Geographical Europe (including western Russian Federation), along with Turkey and Georgia. Occurrence records were assigned projected geographic coordinates (EPSG:3035) at 100 m resolution but with varying spatial uncertainty.
Time Period and Grain
1907–2017.
Major Taxa and Level of Measurement
Crustacea: Copepoda. Most records have species-level identification, while some of them are identified at the subspecies level.
Software Format
Comma-separated values file (.csv) and Excel file (.xlsx), with UTF-8 encoding and meta-data provided following the Darwin Core standard.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.