Yousef Alramzi, Yashar Aghaei, Mohammad Mahdi Badami, Mohammad Aldekheel, Ramin Tohidi, Constantinos Sioutas
{"title":"Urban Emissions of Fine and Ultrafine Particulate Matter in Los Angeles: Sources and Variations in Lung-Deposited Surface Area","authors":"Yousef Alramzi, Yashar Aghaei, Mohammad Mahdi Badami, Mohammad Aldekheel, Ramin Tohidi, Constantinos Sioutas","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Airborne particulate matter (PM) in urban environments poses significant health risks by penetrating the respiratory system, with concern over lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) as an indicator of particle exposure. This study aimed to investigate the diurnal trends and sources of LDSA, particle number concentration (PNC), elemental carbon (EC), and organic carbon (OC) concentrations in Los Angeles across different seasons to provide a comprehensive understanding of the contributions from primary and secondary sources of ultrafine particles (UFPs). Hourly measurements of PNC and LDSA were conducted using the DiSCmini and Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS), while OC and EC concentrations were measured using the Sunset Lab EC/OC Monitor. The results showed distinct diurnal trends in PNC and EC, with peaks occurring in the early morning and evening, which were consistent with periods of increased traffic volume. During warmer periods, a midday increase in PNC was observed, attributed to photochemical reactions. In contrast, a nighttime peak during colder months suggested the formation of secondary aerosols through aqueous-phase chemistry. Additionally, the DiSCmini consistently reported higher LDSA values than SMPS, indicating the presence of irregularly shaped UFPs, particularly during periods of heavy traffic flow. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis identified three primary sources. Factor 1 (photochemically influenced processes), driven by secondary organic aerosol formation during warmer periods, contributed to 19% of LDSA. Factor 2, in which primarily traffic influenced emissions were the dominant contributor, accounting for 70% of LDSA and associated with high loadings of OC (61%), EC (78%), and NO<sub>x</sub> (94%). Factor 3 (aqueous phase secondary process influenced emissions) during colder months, accounted for 11% of LDSA. Both Factor 1 and 3 sources exhibited comparable contributions of OC<sub>4</sub> (52% and 48%, respectively), underscoring their roles in secondary aerosol formation. These findings emphasize the need to address both primary and secondary emissions to mitigate health risks associated with UFP exposure.","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Airborne particulate matter (PM) in urban environments poses significant health risks by penetrating the respiratory system, with concern over lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) as an indicator of particle exposure. This study aimed to investigate the diurnal trends and sources of LDSA, particle number concentration (PNC), elemental carbon (EC), and organic carbon (OC) concentrations in Los Angeles across different seasons to provide a comprehensive understanding of the contributions from primary and secondary sources of ultrafine particles (UFPs). Hourly measurements of PNC and LDSA were conducted using the DiSCmini and Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS), while OC and EC concentrations were measured using the Sunset Lab EC/OC Monitor. The results showed distinct diurnal trends in PNC and EC, with peaks occurring in the early morning and evening, which were consistent with periods of increased traffic volume. During warmer periods, a midday increase in PNC was observed, attributed to photochemical reactions. In contrast, a nighttime peak during colder months suggested the formation of secondary aerosols through aqueous-phase chemistry. Additionally, the DiSCmini consistently reported higher LDSA values than SMPS, indicating the presence of irregularly shaped UFPs, particularly during periods of heavy traffic flow. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis identified three primary sources. Factor 1 (photochemically influenced processes), driven by secondary organic aerosol formation during warmer periods, contributed to 19% of LDSA. Factor 2, in which primarily traffic influenced emissions were the dominant contributor, accounting for 70% of LDSA and associated with high loadings of OC (61%), EC (78%), and NOx (94%). Factor 3 (aqueous phase secondary process influenced emissions) during colder months, accounted for 11% of LDSA. Both Factor 1 and 3 sources exhibited comparable contributions of OC4 (52% and 48%, respectively), underscoring their roles in secondary aerosol formation. These findings emphasize the need to address both primary and secondary emissions to mitigate health risks associated with UFP exposure.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health.
Subject areas include, but are not limited to:
• Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies;
• Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change;
• Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest;
• New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.