Benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing in critical care survivors and the risk of rehospitalisation or death due to falls/trauma and due to any cause: a retrospective matched cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elizabeth T. Mansi, Christopher T. Rentsch, Richard S. Bourne, Annie Jeffery, Bruce Guthrie, Nazir I. Lone
{"title":"Benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing in critical care survivors and the risk of rehospitalisation or death due to falls/trauma and due to any cause: a retrospective matched cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink","authors":"Elizabeth T. Mansi, Christopher T. Rentsch, Richard S. Bourne, Annie Jeffery, Bruce Guthrie, Nazir I. Lone","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07762-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are often prescribed to critical care survivors due to high prevalence of mental health problems and insomnia. However, their safety has not been studied in this population.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study of 28,678 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018: 4844 prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs, matched to 23,834 unexposed survivors using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked datasets. Multivariable stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the adjusted hazards ratio (adjHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of community benzodiazepine/z-drug prescribing and falls/trauma-related events, as well as all-cause 30-day rehospitalisation or death. We performed subgroup analyses on patients without pre-critical care admission prescription of benzodiazepines/z-drugs (‘treatment-naïve’), and sensitivity analyses excluding patients receiving palliative care after discharge.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Prescription of benzodiazepines or z-drugs showed no conclusive evidence of increased risk of falls/trauma-related events in the whole cohort (adjHR 1.27; 95%CI 0.76–2.14) or in treatment-naïve individuals (adjHR 1.79; 95%CI 0.61–5.26), because estimates lacked precision due to low event rates. For all-cause rehospitalisation or death, benzodiazepines/z-drugs were associated with increased risk (whole cohort adjHR 1.24, 95%CI 1.14–1.36; treatment-naïve adjHR 1.66, 95%CI 1.49–1.86). However, after excluding patients treated for palliative care, the association persisted only in treatment-naïve individuals (whole cohort adjHR 1.08, 95%CI 0.98–1.19; treatment-naïve adjHR 1.42, 95%CI1.25–1.62).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Community benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing was associated with increased risk of all-cause, but not falls/trauma-related, rehospitalisations and deaths in critical care survivors who had not been prescribed these before hospitalisation. Clinicians should balance the possible benefits with the likely harms of prescribing these drugs in this potentially vulnerable patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07762-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are often prescribed to critical care survivors due to high prevalence of mental health problems and insomnia. However, their safety has not been studied in this population.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of 28,678 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018: 4844 prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs, matched to 23,834 unexposed survivors using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked datasets. Multivariable stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the adjusted hazards ratio (adjHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of community benzodiazepine/z-drug prescribing and falls/trauma-related events, as well as all-cause 30-day rehospitalisation or death. We performed subgroup analyses on patients without pre-critical care admission prescription of benzodiazepines/z-drugs (‘treatment-naïve’), and sensitivity analyses excluding patients receiving palliative care after discharge.

Results

Prescription of benzodiazepines or z-drugs showed no conclusive evidence of increased risk of falls/trauma-related events in the whole cohort (adjHR 1.27; 95%CI 0.76–2.14) or in treatment-naïve individuals (adjHR 1.79; 95%CI 0.61–5.26), because estimates lacked precision due to low event rates. For all-cause rehospitalisation or death, benzodiazepines/z-drugs were associated with increased risk (whole cohort adjHR 1.24, 95%CI 1.14–1.36; treatment-naïve adjHR 1.66, 95%CI 1.49–1.86). However, after excluding patients treated for palliative care, the association persisted only in treatment-naïve individuals (whole cohort adjHR 1.08, 95%CI 0.98–1.19; treatment-naïve adjHR 1.42, 95%CI1.25–1.62).

Conclusions

Community benzodiazepine and z-drug prescribing was associated with increased risk of all-cause, but not falls/trauma-related, rehospitalisations and deaths in critical care survivors who had not been prescribed these before hospitalisation. Clinicians should balance the possible benefits with the likely harms of prescribing these drugs in this potentially vulnerable patient group.

重症监护幸存者的苯二氮卓类药物和z-药物处方以及因跌倒/创伤和任何原因导致的再住院或死亡的风险:使用英国临床实践研究数据链的回顾性匹配队列研究
目的:由于精神健康问题和失眠症的高发,经常给重症监护幸存者开苯二氮卓类药物和z类药物。然而,它们在这一人群中的安全性尚未得到研究。方法回顾性队列研究2010年和2018年住院的28,678名成人重症监护幸存者:4844名处方苯二氮卓类药物或z-药物,与23,834名未暴露的幸存者相匹配,使用英国临床实践研究数据链链接数据集。采用多变量分层Cox回归估计社区苯二氮卓类药物/z类药物处方、跌倒/创伤相关事件以及全因30天再住院或死亡的校正风险比(adjHR), 95%置信区间(CI)。我们对入院前未开苯二氮卓类药物/z-药物处方的患者进行了亚组分析(treatment-naïve),并对出院后接受姑息治疗的患者进行了敏感性分析。结果在整个队列中,苯二氮卓类药物或z类药物的处方没有确凿证据表明会增加跌倒/创伤相关事件的风险(adjHR 1.27;95%CI 0.76-2.14)或treatment-naïve个体(adjHR 1.79;95%CI 0.61-5.26),因为低事件发生率导致估计缺乏精度。对于全因再住院或死亡,苯二氮卓类药物/z类药物与风险增加相关(全队列adjr 1.24, 95%CI 1.14-1.36;treatment-naïve adjHR 1.66, 95%CI 1.49-1.86)。然而,在排除接受姑息治疗的患者后,这种关联仅在treatment-naïve个体中存在(整个队列adjHR 1.08, 95%CI 0.98-1.19;treatment-naïve adjHR 1.42, 95%CI1.25-1.62)。结论社区苯二氮卓类药物和z-药物处方与全因风险增加有关,但与住院前未开处方的重症监护幸存者的跌倒/创伤相关、再住院和死亡风险无关。临床医生应该平衡在这个潜在的弱势患者群体中开这些药物可能带来的益处和可能带来的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信