Optimization of the density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jonah M. Dimnik , Kurt H. Wilde , W. Brent Edwards
{"title":"Optimization of the density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones","authors":"Jonah M. Dimnik ,&nbsp;Kurt H. Wilde ,&nbsp;W. Brent Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rabbit is a popular experimental model in orthopaedic biomechanics due to the presence of natural Haversian remodeling, allowing for better translational relevance to the mechanobiology of human bone over traditional rodent models. Although rabbits are often used with computational modeling approaches such as the finite element (FE) method, a validated and widely agreed upon density–elasticity relationship, which is required to make subject-specific predictions, does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine and validate an accurate density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones using mathematical optimization. Fourteen tibiae and thirteen femora were harvested from New Zealand White Rabbits, imaged with computed tomography (CT), and cyclically loaded in uniaxial compression while strain gauge rosette data were recorded. The CT images were processed into subject-specific FE models which were used in a Nelder–Mead optimization routine to determine a density–elasticity relationship that minimized the error between experimentally measured and FE-predicted principal strains. Optimizations were performed for the tibiae and femora independently, and for both bones combined. A subset of 4 tibiae and 4 femora that were excluded from the optimization were then used to validate the derived relationships. All equations that were determined by the initial optimization exhibited a <span><math><mrow><mi>Y</mi><mo>=</mo><mi>X</mi></mrow></math></span> type of relationship with strong correlations (Tibiae: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>96</mn></mrow></math></span>; Femora: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>85</mn></mrow></math></span>; Combined: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>90</mn></mrow></math></span>) and good agreement. The validation groups yielded similar results with strong correlations (Tibiae: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>94</mn></mrow></math></span>; Femora: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>87</mn></mrow></math></span>; Combined: <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>91</mn></mrow></math></span>). These findings suggest that any of the derived density–elasticity relationships are suitable for computational modeling of the rabbit hindlimb and that a single relationship could be used for the whole rabbit hindlimb in studies where greater computational efficiency is necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124005149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rabbit is a popular experimental model in orthopaedic biomechanics due to the presence of natural Haversian remodeling, allowing for better translational relevance to the mechanobiology of human bone over traditional rodent models. Although rabbits are often used with computational modeling approaches such as the finite element (FE) method, a validated and widely agreed upon density–elasticity relationship, which is required to make subject-specific predictions, does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine and validate an accurate density–elasticity relationship for rabbit hindlimb bones using mathematical optimization. Fourteen tibiae and thirteen femora were harvested from New Zealand White Rabbits, imaged with computed tomography (CT), and cyclically loaded in uniaxial compression while strain gauge rosette data were recorded. The CT images were processed into subject-specific FE models which were used in a Nelder–Mead optimization routine to determine a density–elasticity relationship that minimized the error between experimentally measured and FE-predicted principal strains. Optimizations were performed for the tibiae and femora independently, and for both bones combined. A subset of 4 tibiae and 4 femora that were excluded from the optimization were then used to validate the derived relationships. All equations that were determined by the initial optimization exhibited a Y=X type of relationship with strong correlations (Tibiae: R2=0.96; Femora: R2=0.85; Combined: R2=0.90) and good agreement. The validation groups yielded similar results with strong correlations (Tibiae: R2=0.94; Femora: R2=0.87; Combined: R2=0.91). These findings suggest that any of the derived density–elasticity relationships are suitable for computational modeling of the rabbit hindlimb and that a single relationship could be used for the whole rabbit hindlimb in studies where greater computational efficiency is necessary.

Abstract Image

兔后肢骨密度-弹性关系的优化。
由于存在天然的哈弗氏重塑,兔子在骨科生物力学中是一种流行的实验模型,与传统的啮齿动物模型相比,它可以更好地转化为人类骨骼的力学生物学。虽然兔子经常被用于计算建模方法,如有限元(FE)方法,但并不存在经过验证和广泛同意的密度-弹性关系,这是做出特定主题预测所必需的。因此,本研究的目的是通过数学优化来确定和验证兔后肢骨的精确密度-弹性关系。从新西兰大白兔身上取下14条胫骨和13条股骨,用计算机断层扫描(CT)成像,并在单轴压缩下循环加载,同时记录应变仪花环数据。CT图像被处理成特定对象的有限元模型,用于Nelder-Mead优化程序,以确定密度-弹性关系,使实验测量的主应变与有限元预测的主应变之间的误差最小。分别对胫骨和股骨进行优化,对两种骨骼进行联合优化。然后使用从优化中排除的4个胫骨和4个股骨的子集来验证导出的关系。通过初始优化确定的所有方程均呈现Y=X型关系,具有强相关性(Tibiae: R2=0.96;腿节:R2 = 0.85;综合:R2=0.90),一致性好。验证组的结果相似,相关性强(胫骨:R2=0.94;腿节:R2 = 0.87;结合:R2 = 0.91)。这些发现表明,任何导出的密度-弹性关系都适用于兔后肢的计算建模,并且在需要更高计算效率的研究中,可以将单个关系用于整个兔后肢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信