Sensitization on Hemodialysis After Renal Graft Failure: HLA Incompatibility Still Matters

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Mar Huelva-López, Marta Ciudad-Montejo, Carlos Fernando Novillo-Sarmiento, Cayetana Moyano-Peregrín, Victoria Eugenia García-Montemayor, Raquel Ojeda-López, María Luisa Agüera-Morales, Alberto Rodríguez-Benot
{"title":"Sensitization on Hemodialysis After Renal Graft Failure: HLA Incompatibility Still Matters","authors":"Mar Huelva-López,&nbsp;Marta Ciudad-Montejo,&nbsp;Carlos Fernando Novillo-Sarmiento,&nbsp;Cayetana Moyano-Peregrín,&nbsp;Victoria Eugenia García-Montemayor,&nbsp;Raquel Ojeda-López,&nbsp;María Luisa Agüera-Morales,&nbsp;Alberto Rodríguez-Benot","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients with renal graft failure can develop human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization when returning to dialysis. There is no consensus on which factors could be associated with an increased risk of this kind of sensitization after graft loss. To try to identify some of these factors, a retrospective observational study was performed in our center. Demographic and transplant-related data were collected: HLA mismatches, changes in calculated panel reactive antibody percentage over time, the immunosuppression withdrawal schedule during the first year on hemodialysis (HD), among others. Patients who developed anti-HLA antibodies after 1 year on HD had a greater number of total HLA mismatches (4.15 ± 1.3 vs 3.3 ± 1.1; <em>P</em> = .001), HLA-DR (1.35 ± 0.7 vs 0.7 ± 0.6; <em>P</em> = .001) and HLA-A mismatches (1.70 ± 0.5 vs 1.27 ± 0.7; <em>P</em> = .004) than patients who never developed anti-HLA antibodies. When we only analyzed patients who develop ≥98% calculated panel reactive antibody versus those who persist without anti-HLA antibodies, these differences were more evident (5.2 ± 1.1 MM vs 3.3 ± 1.1 MM; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The timing of discontinuation of immunosuppression did not influence sensitization. Thus, we have observed that HLA mismatches influence HLA sensitization after graft failure at least during the first year on HD. This study supports the importance of prioritizing HLA matching in patients who may require &gt;1 graft over the years and being aware of the potential importance of HLA mismatches on sensitization on HD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 1","pages":"Pages 27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524006729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with renal graft failure can develop human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization when returning to dialysis. There is no consensus on which factors could be associated with an increased risk of this kind of sensitization after graft loss. To try to identify some of these factors, a retrospective observational study was performed in our center. Demographic and transplant-related data were collected: HLA mismatches, changes in calculated panel reactive antibody percentage over time, the immunosuppression withdrawal schedule during the first year on hemodialysis (HD), among others. Patients who developed anti-HLA antibodies after 1 year on HD had a greater number of total HLA mismatches (4.15 ± 1.3 vs 3.3 ± 1.1; P = .001), HLA-DR (1.35 ± 0.7 vs 0.7 ± 0.6; P = .001) and HLA-A mismatches (1.70 ± 0.5 vs 1.27 ± 0.7; P = .004) than patients who never developed anti-HLA antibodies. When we only analyzed patients who develop ≥98% calculated panel reactive antibody versus those who persist without anti-HLA antibodies, these differences were more evident (5.2 ± 1.1 MM vs 3.3 ± 1.1 MM; P < .001). The timing of discontinuation of immunosuppression did not influence sensitization. Thus, we have observed that HLA mismatches influence HLA sensitization after graft failure at least during the first year on HD. This study supports the importance of prioritizing HLA matching in patients who may require >1 graft over the years and being aware of the potential importance of HLA mismatches on sensitization on HD.
移植肾失败后血液透析致敏:HLA配伍仍然重要。
肾移植失败的患者在返回透析时可发生人白细胞抗原(HLA)敏化。对于哪些因素可能与移植物丢失后这种增敏的风险增加有关,目前还没有达成共识。为了确定其中的一些因素,我们在本中心进行了一项回顾性观察研究。收集了人口统计学和移植相关数据:HLA错配,计算出的面板反应性抗体百分比随时间的变化,血液透析(HD)第一年的免疫抑制停药计划等。治疗1年后出现抗HLA抗体的患者总HLA错配数更高(4.15±1.3 vs 3.3±1.1;P = .001), HLA-DR(1.35±0.7 vs 0.7±0.6;P = .001)和HLA-A错配(1.70±0.5 vs 1.27±0.7;P = 0.004)。当我们只分析产生≥98%计算面板反应性抗体的患者与持续无抗hla抗体的患者时,这些差异更为明显(5.2±1.1 MM vs 3.3±1.1 MM;P < 0.001)。停止免疫抑制的时间不影响致敏。因此,我们观察到HLA错配至少在HD患者移植失败后的第一年影响HLA致敏。这项研究支持了优先考虑HLA匹配的重要性,这些患者可能需要多年的bbb1移植,并意识到HLA不匹配对HD致敏的潜在重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信