Comparison of anterior chamber depth measured by three different anterior segment analysis systems

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Han Song , Wei Yang , Chunliu Yang , Qing Sun
{"title":"Comparison of anterior chamber depth measured by three different anterior segment analysis systems","authors":"Han Song ,&nbsp;Wei Yang ,&nbsp;Chunliu Yang ,&nbsp;Qing Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to compare and evaluate the correlation and agreement among three distinct anterior segment analysis systems in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) in healthy myopic individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Myopic patients who underwent preoperative assessments at our hospital's refractive surgery department from January 2021 to December 2023 were included in this investigation. ACD was measured using three anterior segment analysis systems: Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. The Pearson method was utilized to analyze correlations between the measured values of the three groups. Bland-Altman scatter plots were generated using MedCalc software, with 95 % limits of agreement applied to assess consistency among the datasets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by the Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700 was found to be 3.26 ± 0.26 mm, 3.30 ± 0.26 mm and 3.22 ± 0.25 mm, respectively. The mean ACD values obtained from these three devices exhibited statistically significant differences (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, the ACD measurements from all three devices demonstrated a strong positive correlation with each other, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>r</em> = 0.965 (Pentacam and Sirius), <em>r</em> = 0.955 (Pentacam and IOLMaster 700), and <em>r</em> = 0.966 (Sirius and IOLMaster 700). The respective 95 % LoAs were -1.16 ∼ -0.73(Pentacam and Sirius);0.55 ∼ 1.05(Pentacam and IOLMaster 700);1.53 ∼ 1.96 (Sirius and IOLMaster 700).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a high positive correlation between the anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by three different anterior segment analysis systems in healthy myopic eyes. However, the differences in the measurement of different optical devices should be considered in clinical work, and it is not recommended to interchange them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 104471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025000018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to compare and evaluate the correlation and agreement among three distinct anterior segment analysis systems in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) in healthy myopic individuals.

Methods

Myopic patients who underwent preoperative assessments at our hospital's refractive surgery department from January 2021 to December 2023 were included in this investigation. ACD was measured using three anterior segment analysis systems: Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. The Pearson method was utilized to analyze correlations between the measured values of the three groups. Bland-Altman scatter plots were generated using MedCalc software, with 95 % limits of agreement applied to assess consistency among the datasets.

Results

The mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by the Pentacam, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700 was found to be 3.26 ± 0.26 mm, 3.30 ± 0.26 mm and 3.22 ± 0.25 mm, respectively. The mean ACD values obtained from these three devices exhibited statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the ACD measurements from all three devices demonstrated a strong positive correlation with each other, p < 0.001, r = 0.965 (Pentacam and Sirius), r = 0.955 (Pentacam and IOLMaster 700), and r = 0.966 (Sirius and IOLMaster 700). The respective 95 % LoAs were -1.16 ∼ -0.73(Pentacam and Sirius);0.55 ∼ 1.05(Pentacam and IOLMaster 700);1.53 ∼ 1.96 (Sirius and IOLMaster 700).

Conclusion

There is a high positive correlation between the anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by three different anterior segment analysis systems in healthy myopic eyes. However, the differences in the measurement of different optical devices should be considered in clinical work, and it is not recommended to interchange them.
三种不同前节分析系统测量的前房深度的比较。
目的:本研究旨在比较和评价三种不同的前段分析系统在测量健康近视个体前房深度(ACD)时的相关性和一致性。方法:选取于2021年1月至2023年12月在我院屈光外科行术前评估的近视患者作为研究对象。ACD测量采用三种前节分析系统:Pentacam、Sirius和IOLMaster 700。采用SPSS软件进行统计学分析。采用Pearson方法分析三组测量值之间的相关性。使用MedCalc软件生成Bland-Altman散点图,采用95%的一致性限来评估数据集之间的一致性。结果:Pentacam、Sirius和IOLMaster 700测量的平均前房深度(ACD)分别为3.26±0.26 mm、3.30±0.26 mm和3.22±0.25 mm。结论:三种不同前节分析系统测量的健康近视眼前房深度(ACD)之间存在高度正相关。但在临床工作中应考虑不同光学装置测量的差异,不建议互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信