The environmental impact of extracellular matrix preparation.

Ying Chen, Zihao Ke, Haiyang Wang, Rui Zhang, Yingjie Zhou, Enrico Marsili, Jin Mei
{"title":"The environmental impact of extracellular matrix preparation.","authors":"Ying Chen, Zihao Ke, Haiyang Wang, Rui Zhang, Yingjie Zhou, Enrico Marsili, Jin Mei","doi":"10.1111/febs.17385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a network of proteins and other molecules that encase and support cells and tissues in the body. As clinical and biotechnological uses of ECM are expanding, it is essential to assess the environmental impact associated with its production. Due to high levels of customization, various laboratories employ distinct methods; therefore, this study evaluates three common protocols. Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology has been developed to evaluate the environmental impacts of products produced through diverse processes. Despite its widespread application in the pharmaceutical industry, LCA has seldom been utilized to estimate the environmental effects of laboratory protocols. This Viewpoint applies LCA to assess the functionality and environmental impacts of ECM produced via P1, P2, and P3. The results of this assessment indicate that the protocol with the highest impact generates approximately 43 times more CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent emissions (CO<sub>2</sub> eq) than that with the lowest impact, while the ECM produced using the least impactful protocol demonstrates the highest biocompatibility. Additional environmental indicators such as eutrophication, photochemical oxidation, and acidification also vary among the tested protocols. This work underscores the need to factor environmental impact in the development of novel biomedical materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94226,"journal":{"name":"The FEBS journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The FEBS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.17385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a network of proteins and other molecules that encase and support cells and tissues in the body. As clinical and biotechnological uses of ECM are expanding, it is essential to assess the environmental impact associated with its production. Due to high levels of customization, various laboratories employ distinct methods; therefore, this study evaluates three common protocols. Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology has been developed to evaluate the environmental impacts of products produced through diverse processes. Despite its widespread application in the pharmaceutical industry, LCA has seldom been utilized to estimate the environmental effects of laboratory protocols. This Viewpoint applies LCA to assess the functionality and environmental impacts of ECM produced via P1, P2, and P3. The results of this assessment indicate that the protocol with the highest impact generates approximately 43 times more CO2-equivalent emissions (CO2 eq) than that with the lowest impact, while the ECM produced using the least impactful protocol demonstrates the highest biocompatibility. Additional environmental indicators such as eutrophication, photochemical oxidation, and acidification also vary among the tested protocols. This work underscores the need to factor environmental impact in the development of novel biomedical materials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信