Influence of Active Production Versus Passive Consumption of Podcasts on Medical Students' Learning Outcomes

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1111/tct.70029
Matthias Carl Laupichler, Alexandra Aster, Lara Soyubey, Gilda Masala, Greta Winkelhorst, Rike Remmert, Tobias Raupach, Anthea Peters
{"title":"Influence of Active Production Versus Passive Consumption of Podcasts on Medical Students' Learning Outcomes","authors":"Matthias Carl Laupichler,&nbsp;Alexandra Aster,&nbsp;Lara Soyubey,&nbsp;Gilda Masala,&nbsp;Greta Winkelhorst,&nbsp;Rike Remmert,&nbsp;Tobias Raupach,&nbsp;Anthea Peters","doi":"10.1111/tct.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In recent years, podcasts have been increasingly deployed in medical education. However, studies often fail to evaluate the learning outcomes from these podcasts effectively. The aim of this study was to determine whether the active production of podcasts enhances students' knowledge compared to the passive consumption of student-produced podcasts, as it increases the engagement with the learning content through active learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study was conducted at a German medical school during the fifth-year paediatrics block internship. The final sample consisted of 86 students who were divided into small groups that produced podcasts on one paediatric topic on the first day and listened to a podcast on another topic on the second day.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The first group, which produced a podcast on topic A and only listened to a podcast on topic B, performed significantly better on questions on topic A than on questions on topic B, (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>d</i> = 0.63). This effect was not observed in the second group, which produced a podcast on topic B and listened to a podcast on topic A (<i>p</i> = 0.81, <i>d</i> = 0.04). Additionally, it was found that a longer time interval between podcast production and the knowledge test led to poorer memory performance (<i>β</i> = 1.10, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While the differing results between the two groups may be due to a lack of power to detect meaningful differences, this study nonetheless provides initial evidence that the active production of podcasts may enhance the learning outcomes of medical students.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Not applicable</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In recent years, podcasts have been increasingly deployed in medical education. However, studies often fail to evaluate the learning outcomes from these podcasts effectively. The aim of this study was to determine whether the active production of podcasts enhances students' knowledge compared to the passive consumption of student-produced podcasts, as it increases the engagement with the learning content through active learning.

Methods

The study was conducted at a German medical school during the fifth-year paediatrics block internship. The final sample consisted of 86 students who were divided into small groups that produced podcasts on one paediatric topic on the first day and listened to a podcast on another topic on the second day.

Results

The first group, which produced a podcast on topic A and only listened to a podcast on topic B, performed significantly better on questions on topic A than on questions on topic B, (p < 0.01, d = 0.63). This effect was not observed in the second group, which produced a podcast on topic B and listened to a podcast on topic A (p = 0.81, d = 0.04). Additionally, it was found that a longer time interval between podcast production and the knowledge test led to poorer memory performance (β = 1.10, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

While the differing results between the two groups may be due to a lack of power to detect meaningful differences, this study nonetheless provides initial evidence that the active production of podcasts may enhance the learning outcomes of medical students.

Trial Registration: Not applicable

Abstract Image

播客的主动制作与被动消费对医学生学习成果的影响。
近年来,播客越来越多地应用于医学教育。然而,研究往往不能有效地评估这些播客的学习成果。本研究的目的是确定与被动消费学生制作的播客相比,主动制作播客是否能增强学生的知识,因为它通过主动学习增加了对学习内容的参与。方法:该研究是在德国一所医学院进行的第五年制儿科实习。最后的样本包括86名学生,他们被分成几个小组,第一天制作一个儿科主题的播客,第二天听另一个主题的播客。结果:第一组,制作了主题a的播客,只听了主题B的播客,在主题a问题上的表现明显好于主题B的问题,(p结论:虽然两组之间的不同结果可能是由于缺乏检测有意义差异的能力,但本研究仍然提供了初步证据,表明积极制作播客可能会提高医学生的学习成果。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信