Accelerated long-term forgetting: Design and validation of a neuropsychological tool in healthy subjects and diagnostic accuracy in a group of subjects with severe acquired brain injury.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giulia Pieracci, Federica Satriano, Antonio Liberatore D'Agostino, Marta Rodini, Carlo Caltagirone, Rita Formisano, Vincenzo Vinicola, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
{"title":"Accelerated long-term forgetting: Design and validation of a neuropsychological tool in healthy subjects and diagnostic accuracy in a group of subjects with severe acquired brain injury.","authors":"Giulia Pieracci, Federica Satriano, Antonio Liberatore D'Agostino, Marta Rodini, Carlo Caltagirone, Rita Formisano, Vincenzo Vinicola, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2449564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accelerated Long-term Forgetting (ALF) is a phenomenon characterized by abnormal memory forgetting over hours or days, despite normal initial acquisition. Because standardized memory assessments typically test memory retention over delays of up to 30 minutes, ALF may be undetected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first Experiment of the present study was aimed to validate, in a sample of healthy subjects (<i>n</i> = 54, 20 to 79 years old), a long-term verbal and visuospatial memory procedure, using common tests but administered at extended intervals. In Experiment 2, we aimed to explore ALF pattern in a sample of patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) who subjectively complained of memory difficulties and nevertheless obtained normal or only mildly deficient scores on traditional memory tasks (<i>n</i> = 10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of Experiment 1 showed that both the verbal and visuo-spatial memory tasks proved to be valid and effective at illustrating the phenomenon of forgetting along the time intervals considered. Moreover, a significant association was found between higher saving scores passing from the 30 min to the 24 hr interval of the verbal test and the score obtained on a questionnaire assessing the subjective feeling of memory functioning. Results of Experiment 2 showed that patients with sABI obtained reduced 30 m-24hr saving scores on the verbal test as compared to healthy controls despite comparable forgetting at earlier and later delays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the utility of extended memory assessment, thus the need for validation of specific diagnostic tools in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2449564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accelerated Long-term Forgetting (ALF) is a phenomenon characterized by abnormal memory forgetting over hours or days, despite normal initial acquisition. Because standardized memory assessments typically test memory retention over delays of up to 30 minutes, ALF may be undetected.

Methods: The first Experiment of the present study was aimed to validate, in a sample of healthy subjects (n = 54, 20 to 79 years old), a long-term verbal and visuospatial memory procedure, using common tests but administered at extended intervals. In Experiment 2, we aimed to explore ALF pattern in a sample of patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) who subjectively complained of memory difficulties and nevertheless obtained normal or only mildly deficient scores on traditional memory tasks (n = 10).

Results: Results of Experiment 1 showed that both the verbal and visuo-spatial memory tasks proved to be valid and effective at illustrating the phenomenon of forgetting along the time intervals considered. Moreover, a significant association was found between higher saving scores passing from the 30 min to the 24 hr interval of the verbal test and the score obtained on a questionnaire assessing the subjective feeling of memory functioning. Results of Experiment 2 showed that patients with sABI obtained reduced 30 m-24hr saving scores on the verbal test as compared to healthy controls despite comparable forgetting at earlier and later delays.

Conclusions: These findings support the utility of extended memory assessment, thus the need for validation of specific diagnostic tools in clinical practice.

加速长期遗忘:一种神经心理学工具在健康受试者中的设计和验证,以及在一组严重后天性脑损伤受试者中的诊断准确性。
目的:加速长期遗忘(ALF)是一种现象,其特征是尽管最初获得正常的记忆,但在数小时或数天内却出现了异常的记忆遗忘。由于标准化的记忆评估通常测试长达30分钟的记忆保留时间,因此ALF可能无法检测到。方法:本研究的第一个实验旨在验证健康受试者(n = 54,年龄在20至79岁之间)的长期言语和视觉空间记忆过程,使用常规测试,但间隔较长。在实验2中,我们的目的是探索ALF模式在严重获得性脑损伤(sABI)患者的样本中,这些患者主观上抱怨记忆困难,但在传统记忆任务中获得正常或轻度缺陷的分数(n = 10)。结果:实验1的结果表明,语言记忆任务和视觉空间记忆任务都能有效地解释所考虑的时间间隔的遗忘现象。此外,在30分钟至24小时的语言测试间隔中,较高的储蓄分数与评估记忆功能主观感觉的问卷得分之间存在显著关联。实验2的结果显示,与健康对照组相比,sABI患者在语言测试中获得了30 -24小时的节省分数,尽管在较早和较晚的延迟中遗忘的时间相当。结论:这些发现支持扩展记忆评估的效用,因此需要在临床实践中验证特定的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信