Increasing patient viewership of complex imaging reports: The paradox of the Cures Act.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kanhai S Amin, Melissa A Davis, Amir Naderi, Howard P Forman
{"title":"Increasing patient viewership of complex imaging reports: The paradox of the Cures Act.","authors":"Kanhai S Amin, Melissa A Davis, Amir Naderi, Howard P Forman","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As a result of the 21st Century Cures Act, radiology reports are immediately released to patients. We determine if readers of radiology reports, via electronic health records (EHRs), and radiology report complexity have changed post the implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was used to analyze 10,000 radiology reports (equal split of CT, mammogram, MRI, X-ray, and ultrasound modalities) per year between 2013 and 2023. Readability was calculated through reading grade level indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient viewership of their radiology reports via EHRs increased from 3.3 % (95 % CI: 3.0 %-3.7 %) in 2013 to 58.2 % (95 % CI: 57.3 %-59.2 %) in 2023. Once the 21st Century Cures Act's Information Blocking Provision went into effect, there was a significant increase in viewing probability with patients having 1.71 times higher odds of viewing their reports (OR = 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.32, p < 0.001). This increase in patient viewership held for all modalities tested except CT (P < 0.01). Despite increased viewership, the reading grade level of radiologist dictated radiology reports was greater than the recommended level for health information across all years and modalities tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Patients are increasingly engaging with their radiology reports, but reports may be too complex for the typical patient. Solutions will be required to improve patient experience with their radiology reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"119 ","pages":"110398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a result of the 21st Century Cures Act, radiology reports are immediately released to patients. We determine if readers of radiology reports, via electronic health records (EHRs), and radiology report complexity have changed post the implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was used to analyze 10,000 radiology reports (equal split of CT, mammogram, MRI, X-ray, and ultrasound modalities) per year between 2013 and 2023. Readability was calculated through reading grade level indices.

Results: Patient viewership of their radiology reports via EHRs increased from 3.3 % (95 % CI: 3.0 %-3.7 %) in 2013 to 58.2 % (95 % CI: 57.3 %-59.2 %) in 2023. Once the 21st Century Cures Act's Information Blocking Provision went into effect, there was a significant increase in viewing probability with patients having 1.71 times higher odds of viewing their reports (OR = 1.71, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.32, p < 0.001). This increase in patient viewership held for all modalities tested except CT (P < 0.01). Despite increased viewership, the reading grade level of radiologist dictated radiology reports was greater than the recommended level for health information across all years and modalities tested.

Conclusions and relevance: Patients are increasingly engaging with their radiology reports, but reports may be too complex for the typical patient. Solutions will be required to improve patient experience with their radiology reports.

增加患者对复杂影像报告的观看:《治愈法案》的悖论。
背景:根据《21世纪治愈法案》,放射学报告可以立即发布给患者。我们通过电子健康记录(EHRs)确定放射学报告的读者和放射学报告的复杂性是否在21世纪治愈法案实施后发生了变化。方法:采用回顾性观察性研究,分析2013年至2023年间每年1万份影像学报告(CT、乳房x线、MRI、x线和超声等方式)。通过阅读年级水平指标计算可读性。结果:患者通过电子病历查看放射学报告的比例从2013年的3.3% (95% CI: 3.0% - 3.7%)增加到2023年的58.2% (95% CI: 57.3% - 59.2%)。一旦《21世纪治愈法案》的信息封锁条款生效,查看概率显著增加,患者查看报告的几率增加了1.71倍(OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.27-2.32, p)结论和相关性:患者越来越多地参与他们的放射学报告,但报告对于典型患者来说可能过于复杂。需要解决方案来改善患者对放射报告的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信