A new way of the Coombs test using flow cytometry-based assay to assess erythrocytes-bound IgG antibodies in the human and rabbit model.

IF 3.5 3区 医学
Anwar Ullah, Xuewei Ding, Xia Qi, Hui Liu
{"title":"A new way of the Coombs test using flow cytometry-based assay to assess erythrocytes-bound IgG antibodies in the human and rabbit model.","authors":"Anwar Ullah, Xuewei Ding, Xia Qi, Hui Liu","doi":"10.1177/03946320241305270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Coombs test is important in hematology for detecting erythrocyte-bound IgG antibodies or in serm through agglutination methods, but its sensitivity and specificity are limited. Flow cytometry provides a more precise and sensitive alternative for quantitatively assessing RBC-bound IgG antibodies. This assessment is crucial for evaluating the risk of hemolytic reactions and ensuring safe transfusions. This study aimed to explore a new method for the detection of RBC-bound IgG antibodies in rabbits following the injection of human red blood cells. Rabbits serum treated with 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) were serially diluted at ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, 1:1024, and 1:2048. These diluted samples were then reacted with O-type red blood cells (RBCs). Serum samples from healthy individuals were used as the control group. The tubes were kept in a water bath at 37°C for 30 min incubation. After incubation, the samples were analyzed using a flow cytometry-based assay. Additionally, the traditional Coombs tube method was used and the strength of IgG antibody and agglutination was graded. The results were analyzed using a flow cytometry-based assay, and the agglutination strength was determined using the Coombs traditional tube method for RBC-bound IgG antibodies. A significant difference was found between the rabbits serum and normal control groups (p < 0.001). IgG titers increased significantly after 1 month of immunization in rabbits compared to the titers observed after 1 week. The serum Anti-D stability test showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 7.74%, indicating good stability of the test results. In this study, we concluded that the flow cytometry-based assay for detecting RBC-bound IgG antibodies was accurate, sensitive, and had positional value in clinical laboratories and research centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48647,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology","volume":"39 ","pages":"3946320241305270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03946320241305270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Coombs test is important in hematology for detecting erythrocyte-bound IgG antibodies or in serm through agglutination methods, but its sensitivity and specificity are limited. Flow cytometry provides a more precise and sensitive alternative for quantitatively assessing RBC-bound IgG antibodies. This assessment is crucial for evaluating the risk of hemolytic reactions and ensuring safe transfusions. This study aimed to explore a new method for the detection of RBC-bound IgG antibodies in rabbits following the injection of human red blood cells. Rabbits serum treated with 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) were serially diluted at ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, 1:1024, and 1:2048. These diluted samples were then reacted with O-type red blood cells (RBCs). Serum samples from healthy individuals were used as the control group. The tubes were kept in a water bath at 37°C for 30 min incubation. After incubation, the samples were analyzed using a flow cytometry-based assay. Additionally, the traditional Coombs tube method was used and the strength of IgG antibody and agglutination was graded. The results were analyzed using a flow cytometry-based assay, and the agglutination strength was determined using the Coombs traditional tube method for RBC-bound IgG antibodies. A significant difference was found between the rabbits serum and normal control groups (p < 0.001). IgG titers increased significantly after 1 month of immunization in rabbits compared to the titers observed after 1 week. The serum Anti-D stability test showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 7.74%, indicating good stability of the test results. In this study, we concluded that the flow cytometry-based assay for detecting RBC-bound IgG antibodies was accurate, sensitive, and had positional value in clinical laboratories and research centers.

采用基于流式细胞术的Coombs试验方法评估人和兔红细胞结合IgG抗体的新方法。
Coombs试验在血液学中用于检测红细胞结合IgG抗体或通过凝集方法检测血清中IgG抗体很重要,但其敏感性和特异性有限。流式细胞术为定量评估红细胞结合的IgG抗体提供了更精确和敏感的替代方法。这项评估对于评估溶血反应的风险和确保安全输血至关重要。本研究旨在探索兔红细胞注射后检测红细胞结合IgG抗体的新方法。用2-巯基乙醇(2-ME)处理兔血清,按1:1、1:2、1:4、1:8、1:16、1:32、1:64、1:128、1:256、1:512、1:1024和1:2048的比例依次稀释。这些稀释后的样品随后与o型红细胞(rbc)反应。选取健康个体的血清作为对照组。将试管置于37℃水浴中孵育30分钟。孵育后,使用流式细胞术分析样品。采用传统的Coombs试管法,对IgG抗体和凝集强度进行分级。采用流式细胞术对结果进行分析,采用Coombs传统试管法测定红细胞结合IgG抗体的凝集强度。与正常对照组相比,血清中有显著性差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology
International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology is an Open Access peer-reviewed journal publishing original papers describing research in the fields of immunology, pathology and pharmacology. The intention is that the journal should reflect both the experimental and clinical aspects of immunology as well as advances in the understanding of the pathology and pharmacology of the immune system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信