What I say is not what I do: Gender differences in the home mathematics environment.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Suzanne Varnell, Patrick Ehrman, Sona C Kumar, Jacqueline Sandel, Alexa Ellis, David J Purpura
{"title":"What I say is not what I do: Gender differences in the home mathematics environment.","authors":"Suzanne Varnell, Patrick Ehrman, Sona C Kumar, Jacqueline Sandel, Alexa Ellis, David J Purpura","doi":"10.1037/dev0001901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consistent evidence shows that women are underrepresented across most Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics fields. Research indicates that early attitudes and gendered beliefs about mathematics can predict later achievement and academic choices in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics and that children's attitudes are tied to parents' beliefs and interactions with their children surrounding math. To identify potential antecedents of gender differences, we examined whether there are differences between parents of sons and parents of daughters on factors in the home mathematics environment that influence early math experiences for young children. This study used a subset of a publicly available data set, the Early Home Learning Environment, with 929 parents (68% female, 86% White) of 1- to 6-year-old children. Parents rated their beliefs about the importance of mathematics and the appropriateness of various mathematics activities for their children and reported the frequency with which they engage in mathematics activities with their children. We examined whether there were child gender differences in parents' mathematics beliefs, appropriateness ratings, and frequency of numeracy, spatial/geometry, patterning, and measurement activities through a series of between-subjects analyses of variance. Although we found no gender differences in parent ratings of appropriateness of activities or beliefs in the importance of patterning and spatial activities, we did find significant differences in what parents reported doing with boys versus girls after age 4 in the areas of numeracy and measurement. These findings indicate that parents did more numeracy and measurement activities with boys than girls, even though they reported believing that the activities were equally important. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consistent evidence shows that women are underrepresented across most Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics fields. Research indicates that early attitudes and gendered beliefs about mathematics can predict later achievement and academic choices in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics and that children's attitudes are tied to parents' beliefs and interactions with their children surrounding math. To identify potential antecedents of gender differences, we examined whether there are differences between parents of sons and parents of daughters on factors in the home mathematics environment that influence early math experiences for young children. This study used a subset of a publicly available data set, the Early Home Learning Environment, with 929 parents (68% female, 86% White) of 1- to 6-year-old children. Parents rated their beliefs about the importance of mathematics and the appropriateness of various mathematics activities for their children and reported the frequency with which they engage in mathematics activities with their children. We examined whether there were child gender differences in parents' mathematics beliefs, appropriateness ratings, and frequency of numeracy, spatial/geometry, patterning, and measurement activities through a series of between-subjects analyses of variance. Although we found no gender differences in parent ratings of appropriateness of activities or beliefs in the importance of patterning and spatial activities, we did find significant differences in what parents reported doing with boys versus girls after age 4 in the areas of numeracy and measurement. These findings indicate that parents did more numeracy and measurement activities with boys than girls, even though they reported believing that the activities were equally important. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

我说的不是我做的:家庭数学环境中的性别差异。
一致的证据表明,女性在大多数科学、技术、工程和数学领域的代表性不足。研究表明,早期对数学的态度和性别信仰可以预测以后在科学、技术、工程和数学方面的成就和学术选择,儿童的态度与父母对数学的看法和与孩子之间的互动有关。为了确定性别差异的潜在前因,我们研究了儿子的父母和女儿的父母在家庭数学环境中影响幼儿早期数学体验的因素是否存在差异。本研究使用了一个公开可用数据集的子集,即早期家庭学习环境,其中有929名1至6岁儿童的父母(68%为女性,86%为白人)。家长评估了他们对数学的重要性和各种数学活动对孩子的适当性的看法,并报告了他们与孩子一起参加数学活动的频率。我们通过一系列的受试者间方差分析,研究了在父母的数学信念、适当性评分、计算能力、空间/几何、图案和测量活动的频率方面是否存在儿童性别差异。虽然我们没有发现父母对活动适当性的评价或对模式和空间活动重要性的看法存在性别差异,但我们确实发现,父母在4岁以后对男孩和女孩所做的事情在计算和测量方面存在显著差异。这些发现表明,父母与男孩进行的计算和测量活动比与女孩进行的更多,尽管他们报告认为这些活动同样重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信