Ultrasonography-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy for simple renal cysts in children: a comparative study with laparoscopic deroofing and optimization of therapeutic approaches.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Jiali He, Xianhai Yu, Li Zhang, Chunjiang Yang, Qitong Guo, Ping Li, Shengde Wu, Yi Hua, Xing Liu, Dawei He, Tao Lin, Deying Zhang, Guanghui Wei
{"title":"Ultrasonography-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy for simple renal cysts in children: a comparative study with laparoscopic deroofing and optimization of therapeutic approaches.","authors":"Jiali He, Xianhai Yu, Li Zhang, Chunjiang Yang, Qitong Guo, Ping Li, Shengde Wu, Yi Hua, Xing Liu, Dawei He, Tao Lin, Deying Zhang, Guanghui Wei","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05960-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasonography-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy and laparoscopic deroofing for the treatment of simple renal cysts in children, providing evidence for clinical decision-making in the management of pediatric renal cysts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 49 patients with simple renal cysts were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: 29 patients (group 1) underwent laparoscopic deroofing, 20 patients (group 2) underwent ultrasonography-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy. The clinical efficacy differences between the two groups were compared. During the study period, optimizations were made to the aspiration and sclerotherapy procedure in terms of sclerosant injection volume, sclerosing time, frequency, and intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The complete disappearance rate of cysts in group 2(95.0%) was significantly higher than that in group 1 (33.3%) (P < 0.001). The recurrence rate of cysts in group 2 was 0%, significantly lower than that in group 1 (33.3%) (P = 0.014). The group 2 had shorter hospital duration, indwelling catheterization duration, indwelling drainage duration, intraoperative blood loss, and operative time compared to the group 1 (P < 0.001). No severe complications such as intra-abdominal organ injury occurred in either group. However, in the group 2, 6 cases experienced transient low back pain and/or \"alcoholic reaction\", which resolved spontaneously.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to laparoscopic deroofing, aspiration and sclerotherapy for simple renal cysts in children demonstrates a higher complete disappearance rate. It is an economical, minimally invasive, and effective treatment option. The modified aspiration and sclerotherapy in this study showed good clinical outcomes and is worthy of further promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05960-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasonography-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy and laparoscopic deroofing for the treatment of simple renal cysts in children, providing evidence for clinical decision-making in the management of pediatric renal cysts.

Methods: A total of 49 patients with simple renal cysts were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: 29 patients (group 1) underwent laparoscopic deroofing, 20 patients (group 2) underwent ultrasonography-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy. The clinical efficacy differences between the two groups were compared. During the study period, optimizations were made to the aspiration and sclerotherapy procedure in terms of sclerosant injection volume, sclerosing time, frequency, and intervals.

Results: The complete disappearance rate of cysts in group 2(95.0%) was significantly higher than that in group 1 (33.3%) (P < 0.001). The recurrence rate of cysts in group 2 was 0%, significantly lower than that in group 1 (33.3%) (P = 0.014). The group 2 had shorter hospital duration, indwelling catheterization duration, indwelling drainage duration, intraoperative blood loss, and operative time compared to the group 1 (P < 0.001). No severe complications such as intra-abdominal organ injury occurred in either group. However, in the group 2, 6 cases experienced transient low back pain and/or "alcoholic reaction", which resolved spontaneously.

Conclusion: Compared to laparoscopic deroofing, aspiration and sclerotherapy for simple renal cysts in children demonstrates a higher complete disappearance rate. It is an economical, minimally invasive, and effective treatment option. The modified aspiration and sclerotherapy in this study showed good clinical outcomes and is worthy of further promotion.

超声引导下儿童单纯性肾囊肿的抽吸硬化治疗:与腹腔镜清除及治疗方法优化的比较研究。
目的:比较超声引导下抽吸硬化疗法与腹腔镜下清除治疗儿童单纯性肾囊肿的临床效果,为小儿肾囊肿治疗的临床决策提供依据。方法:将49例单纯性肾囊肿患者根据治疗方法分为两组:29例(第一组)采用腹腔镜下清除术,20例(第二组)采用超声引导下抽吸硬化治疗。比较两组临床疗效的差异。在研究期间,对抽吸和硬化治疗过程进行了优化,包括硬化剂注射量、硬化时间、频率和间隔。结果:2组的囊肿完全消失率(95.0%)明显高于1组(33.3%)(P)。结论:与腹腔镜下单纯肾囊肿清除术相比,抽吸硬化法治疗儿童肾囊肿完全消失率更高。这是一种经济、微创、有效的治疗方法。本研究改良抽吸硬化疗法临床效果良好,值得进一步推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信