Decluttering Minds: Psychological interventions for hoarding disorder - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.029
Emily O'Brien, Keith R Laws
{"title":"Decluttering Minds: Psychological interventions for hoarding disorder - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Emily O'Brien, Keith R Laws","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is conventionally considered the primary intervention for Hoarding Disorder (HD), yet various psychological interventions have recently emerged. This study, pre-registered at Prospero (CRD42023427534), aims to comprehensively assess a range of psychological interventions, including CBT, for reducing HD symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search using PubMed and SCOPUS identified 41 eligible studies comprising 47 samples (N = 1343). Risk of bias for RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and methodological quality for all studies was evaluated using the Psychotherapy Outcome Study Methodology Rating Form (POMRF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-post effects revealed a large reduction in HD symptomatology (g = -1.09), sustained at follow-up in 18 studies (g = -1.12, N = 588). Additionally, 8 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) demonstrated a substantial end-of-trial reduction in HD symptoms compared to controls (g = -0.75). Meta-regression found no moderating effects for: demographics, medication use, number of treatment sessions, or study quality. Similarly, no differences were observed between group and individual therapy, therapy with or without home visits, or CBT versus other psychological interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms psychological therapies are effective in reducing hoarding symptoms, while indicating no superiority for CBT. Despite the benefits, symptoms often persist above the clinical cut-off for HD, highlighting the enduring clinical challenges in achieving symptomatic remission. The findings underscore the need to address methodological limitations and possible age and gender bias in future research to enhance the efficacy and inclusivity of psychological interventions for HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"738-751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is conventionally considered the primary intervention for Hoarding Disorder (HD), yet various psychological interventions have recently emerged. This study, pre-registered at Prospero (CRD42023427534), aims to comprehensively assess a range of psychological interventions, including CBT, for reducing HD symptomatology.

Methods: A systematic literature search using PubMed and SCOPUS identified 41 eligible studies comprising 47 samples (N = 1343). Risk of bias for RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and methodological quality for all studies was evaluated using the Psychotherapy Outcome Study Methodology Rating Form (POMRF).

Results: Pre-post effects revealed a large reduction in HD symptomatology (g = -1.09), sustained at follow-up in 18 studies (g = -1.12, N = 588). Additionally, 8 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) demonstrated a substantial end-of-trial reduction in HD symptoms compared to controls (g = -0.75). Meta-regression found no moderating effects for: demographics, medication use, number of treatment sessions, or study quality. Similarly, no differences were observed between group and individual therapy, therapy with or without home visits, or CBT versus other psychological interventions.

Conclusion: This study confirms psychological therapies are effective in reducing hoarding symptoms, while indicating no superiority for CBT. Despite the benefits, symptoms often persist above the clinical cut-off for HD, highlighting the enduring clinical challenges in achieving symptomatic remission. The findings underscore the need to address methodological limitations and possible age and gender bias in future research to enhance the efficacy and inclusivity of psychological interventions for HD.

整理思想:囤积障碍的心理干预-系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)通常被认为是囤积障碍(HD)的主要干预措施,但最近出现了各种心理干预措施。该研究在Prospero预先注册(CRD42023427534),旨在全面评估包括CBT在内的一系列心理干预措施,以减少HD症状。方法:使用PubMed和SCOPUS进行系统文献检索,确定41项符合条件的研究,包括47个样本(N = 1343)。使用Cochrane RoB2工具评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险,使用心理治疗结局研究方法学评定表(POMRF)评估所有研究的方法学质量。结果:前后效应显示HD症状显著减轻(g = -1.09),在18项研究(g = -1.12, N = 588)的随访中持续。此外,8项随机对照试验(rct)显示,与对照组相比,试验结束时HD症状显著减少(g = -0.75)。meta回归发现:人口统计学、药物使用、治疗次数或研究质量没有调节作用。同样,在团体治疗和个人治疗、有或没有家访治疗、CBT与其他心理干预之间也没有观察到差异。结论:本研究证实心理治疗在减轻囤积症状方面是有效的,而CBT没有优势。尽管有益处,但症状通常持续高于HD的临床临界值,突出了实现症状缓解的持久临床挑战。研究结果强调,需要在未来的研究中解决方法局限性和可能的年龄和性别偏见,以提高HD心理干预的有效性和包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信