Suboptimal refeeding compensates stunting in a mouse model of juvenile malnutrition.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jean-Louis Thoumas, Amandine Cavaroc, Damien Sery, François Leulier, Filipe De Vadder
{"title":"Suboptimal refeeding compensates stunting in a mouse model of juvenile malnutrition.","authors":"Jean-Louis Thoumas, Amandine Cavaroc, Damien Sery, François Leulier, Filipe De Vadder","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early postnatal life is a critical period of rapid growth in mammals, heavily reliant on adequate nutrition. Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) during this window can lead to stunting and wasting, with lasting health consequences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed a mouse model of juvenile PEM to assess the effects of refeeding with various diets and interventions on growth recovery, including probiotic supplementation and suboptimal refeeding diets. Outcomes included length and weight catch-up, organ weights, and glucose tolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Juvenile male and female C57Bl/6J mice (N = 8-11/group) were fed a low-protein diet (LPD, 5% kcal from protein) starting at postnatal day 14 (P14) to which the pups and dams had access. Following weaning, mice were refed an optimal diet (27% kcal from protein) at different times (P28 to P56). Male mice received additional interventions, including supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WJL (Lp<sup>WJL</sup>) during refeeding, or refeeding with a Western diet (WD, 15.3% kcal from protein) or a modified Western diet (MWD, 7.5% kcal from protein). Statistical analyses used ANOVA, ANCOVA, and PCA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimal refeeding restored growth in females (body weight in optimal-fed: 20.5 ± 0.3 g vs 19.4 ± 0.6 g in P56-refed), but males showed persistent stunting (26.8 ± 0.7 g vs 21.9 ± 0.9 g; P < 0.05). In males, Lp<sup>WJL</sup> did not enhance growth recovery and exacerbated glucose intolerance in suboptimal refeeding groups. Males refed WD or MWD restored body length but showed impaired glucose metabolism, particularly in mice refed WD, with glycemia 30 minutes after glucose challenge reaching 20.4 ± 4.0 mM vs 14.3 ± 3.0 mM in optimal-fed mice (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sex-dependent differences in recovery from PEM were evident, with males showing incomplete growth recovery despite optimal refeeding. Suboptimal diets compensated for stunting but impaired glucose metabolism, and Lp<sup>WJL</sup> did not improve growth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.01.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early postnatal life is a critical period of rapid growth in mammals, heavily reliant on adequate nutrition. Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) during this window can lead to stunting and wasting, with lasting health consequences.

Objective: This study developed a mouse model of juvenile PEM to assess the effects of refeeding with various diets and interventions on growth recovery, including probiotic supplementation and suboptimal refeeding diets. Outcomes included length and weight catch-up, organ weights, and glucose tolerance.

Methods: Juvenile male and female C57Bl/6J mice (N = 8-11/group) were fed a low-protein diet (LPD, 5% kcal from protein) starting at postnatal day 14 (P14) to which the pups and dams had access. Following weaning, mice were refed an optimal diet (27% kcal from protein) at different times (P28 to P56). Male mice received additional interventions, including supplementation with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WJL (LpWJL) during refeeding, or refeeding with a Western diet (WD, 15.3% kcal from protein) or a modified Western diet (MWD, 7.5% kcal from protein). Statistical analyses used ANOVA, ANCOVA, and PCA.

Results: Optimal refeeding restored growth in females (body weight in optimal-fed: 20.5 ± 0.3 g vs 19.4 ± 0.6 g in P56-refed), but males showed persistent stunting (26.8 ± 0.7 g vs 21.9 ± 0.9 g; P < 0.05). In males, LpWJL did not enhance growth recovery and exacerbated glucose intolerance in suboptimal refeeding groups. Males refed WD or MWD restored body length but showed impaired glucose metabolism, particularly in mice refed WD, with glycemia 30 minutes after glucose challenge reaching 20.4 ± 4.0 mM vs 14.3 ± 3.0 mM in optimal-fed mice (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Sex-dependent differences in recovery from PEM were evident, with males showing incomplete growth recovery despite optimal refeeding. Suboptimal diets compensated for stunting but impaired glucose metabolism, and LpWJL did not improve growth outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信