Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black
{"title":"Modelling vitamin D fortification scenarios for the Australian population.","authors":"Eleanor Dunlop, Anita S Lawrence, Belinda Neo, Mairead Kiely, Anna Rangan, Caryl Nowson, Paul Adorno, Paul Atyeo, Edoardo Tescari, Daniel Russo-Batterham, Kim Doyle, Lucinda J Black","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/day). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We modelled four vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modelled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (RTEBC)). Scenarios 2-4 modelled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted, and addition of the maximum permitted amount to: Scenario 2) dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; Scenario 3) Scenario 2 plus eligible RTEBC; Scenario 4) Scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (EAR, 10 μg/day) and the Australian Upper Level of Intake (UL, 80 μg/day).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under Scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/day was 80, 84, 73 and 60%. No participant exceeded the UL under any scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Low vitamin D status (circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent in Australia, and 95% of Australians have been estimated to have low vitamin D intake (mean range 1.8-3.2 μg/day). Increasing the dietary supply of vitamin D could improve vitamin D status across the population.
Objective: We modelled four vitamin D fortification scenarios to support useful and safe fortification strategies for Australia.
Methods: We used cross-sectional food consumption data from the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 aged 2-85 y) and analytical food composition data. Scenario 1 modelled the systematic addition of the maximum permitted amount of vitamin D to all foods for which vitamin D fortification is mandated (edible oil spreads) or optional (dairy products/plant-based alternatives, formulated beverages, permitted ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (RTEBC)). Scenarios 2-4 modelled the addition of vitamin D to edible oil spreads and fluid milk/alternatives at higher concentrations than permitted, and addition of the maximum permitted amount to: Scenario 2) dairy products/alternatives other than fluid milk, formulated beverages; Scenario 3) Scenario 2 plus eligible RTEBC; Scenario 4) Scenario 3 plus bread (not permitted for vitamin D fortification in Australia). We used the National Cancer Institute method to model usual intake of vitamin D for each scenario by sex and age group. Dietary adequacy and safety were assessed using the North American Estimated Average Requirement (EAR, 10 μg/day) and the Australian Upper Level of Intake (UL, 80 μg/day).
Results: Under Scenarios 1-4, respectively, the projected proportion of Australians with vitamin D intake <10 μg/day was 80, 84, 73 and 60%. No participant exceeded the UL under any scenario.
Conclusions: A systematic fortification strategy could support a nutritionally meaningful improvement in vitamin D intake across the Australian population. An optimal strategy would require amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.