Pain Management in Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Potential Alternatives to Epidural Anesthesia.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Keisuke Yoshida, Tatsumi Yakushiji, Ryosuke Sasaki, Shinju Obara, Satoki Inoue
{"title":"Pain Management in Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Potential Alternatives to Epidural Anesthesia.","authors":"Keisuke Yoshida, Tatsumi Yakushiji, Ryosuke Sasaki, Shinju Obara, Satoki Inoue","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite significant advances in endovascular techniques, open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair continues to play an important role in vascular surgery. Many studies have described the advantages of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia over general anesthesia alone as an analgesic method for open AAA repair. Several recent guidelines have recommended epidural anesthesia as the first option for pain management in open AAA repair. However, AAA repair requires perioperative anticoagulation, and bleeding complications are an inevitable concern. In the past 2 decades, new methods of analgesia, represented by ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, have been developed and become popular in major abdominal surgery. These analgesic methods may address the concern of bleeding complications associated with epidural anesthesia in open AAA repair. Although the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, continuous local wound infiltration, and intravenous administration of lidocaine in open AAA repair have been evaluated in several studies, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks compared with epidural anesthesia. In this article, the authors present a narrative review of pain management techniques used in open AAA repair, focusing on pain management techniques other than epidural anesthesia. Research gaps and the need for further studies on this topic are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite significant advances in endovascular techniques, open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair continues to play an important role in vascular surgery. Many studies have described the advantages of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia over general anesthesia alone as an analgesic method for open AAA repair. Several recent guidelines have recommended epidural anesthesia as the first option for pain management in open AAA repair. However, AAA repair requires perioperative anticoagulation, and bleeding complications are an inevitable concern. In the past 2 decades, new methods of analgesia, represented by ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, have been developed and become popular in major abdominal surgery. These analgesic methods may address the concern of bleeding complications associated with epidural anesthesia in open AAA repair. Although the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, continuous local wound infiltration, and intravenous administration of lidocaine in open AAA repair have been evaluated in several studies, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks compared with epidural anesthesia. In this article, the authors present a narrative review of pain management techniques used in open AAA repair, focusing on pain management techniques other than epidural anesthesia. Research gaps and the need for further studies on this topic are also discussed.

腹主动脉瘤开放性修复中的疼痛处理:硬膜外麻醉的潜在替代方案。
尽管血管内技术取得了重大进展,开放式腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复仍然在血管手术中发挥着重要作用。许多研究描述了硬膜外麻醉联合全身麻醉比单独全身麻醉作为开放式AAA修补术的镇痛方法的优点。最近的一些指南推荐硬膜外麻醉作为开放式AAA修补术疼痛管理的第一选择。然而,AAA修复需要围手术期抗凝,出血并发症是不可避免的问题。近二十年来,以超声引导神经阻滞为代表的新型镇痛方法不断发展,并在腹部大手术中得到广泛应用。这些镇痛方法可以解决开放式AAA修补术中硬膜外麻醉引起的出血并发症。虽然已经有一些研究评价了超声引导下神经阻滞、持续局部创面浸润、静脉给药利多卡因在开放性AAA修补中的疗效和安全性,但很少有研究评价连续神经阻滞与硬膜外麻醉的疗效。在这篇文章中,作者介绍了在开放式AAA修补中使用的疼痛管理技术,重点是硬膜外麻醉以外的疼痛管理技术。本文还讨论了该课题的研究空白和进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信