Assessing Non-Oral PrEP Alternatives Among Young Black Women in the Southern USA.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Damian J Denson, Casey Langer Tesfaye, Daniela Glusberg, Alisú Schoua-Glusberg, Valerie Betley, Bryan Gale, Jessica Cardo, Paula M Frew, Eleanor McLellan-Lemal, Siobhán M O'Connor, Janet M McNicholl
{"title":"Assessing Non-Oral PrEP Alternatives Among Young Black Women in the Southern USA.","authors":"Damian J Denson, Casey Langer Tesfaye, Daniela Glusberg, Alisú Schoua-Glusberg, Valerie Betley, Bryan Gale, Jessica Cardo, Paula M Frew, Eleanor McLellan-Lemal, Siobhán M O'Connor, Janet M McNicholl","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02263-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young Black women in the southern US face a high HIV burden. While daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can effectively prevent HIV, its use is low among Black women. The acceptability of and perceived intention to use emerging PrEP products among young Black women in the southern US are not well understood. Non-oral PrEP alternatives could address challenges to PrEP uptake and reduce health disparities. We conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with Black women aged 18-34 in Atlanta, GA; Baton Rouge, LA; and Jackson, MS, to explore their perspectives on three emerging PrEP products: a long-acting injection, a subdermal implant, and a dual-purpose contraception and HIV prevention intravaginal ring. Seventy-five interviews were conducted from January to October 2021 and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with NVivo software. Most participants were open to using medication to prevent HIV. The intravaginal ring was the most preferred, primarily due to its dual-purpose function, although it was also frequently rejected. The long-acting injection was the second most preferred and least rejected, perceived as the least invasive. The skin implant was the least preferred and most rejected, viewed as the most invasive. Our findings highlight the need for multiple PrEP options to meet individual preferences. Detailed descriptions, instructions, and experiential learning methods are crucial for choosing non-oral PrEP modalities. Practitioners should address questions and offer peer-based learning opportunities. Designing and promoting PrEP strategies for young Black women should involve close consultation with these consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02263-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young Black women in the southern US face a high HIV burden. While daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can effectively prevent HIV, its use is low among Black women. The acceptability of and perceived intention to use emerging PrEP products among young Black women in the southern US are not well understood. Non-oral PrEP alternatives could address challenges to PrEP uptake and reduce health disparities. We conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with Black women aged 18-34 in Atlanta, GA; Baton Rouge, LA; and Jackson, MS, to explore their perspectives on three emerging PrEP products: a long-acting injection, a subdermal implant, and a dual-purpose contraception and HIV prevention intravaginal ring. Seventy-five interviews were conducted from January to October 2021 and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with NVivo software. Most participants were open to using medication to prevent HIV. The intravaginal ring was the most preferred, primarily due to its dual-purpose function, although it was also frequently rejected. The long-acting injection was the second most preferred and least rejected, perceived as the least invasive. The skin implant was the least preferred and most rejected, viewed as the most invasive. Our findings highlight the need for multiple PrEP options to meet individual preferences. Detailed descriptions, instructions, and experiential learning methods are crucial for choosing non-oral PrEP modalities. Practitioners should address questions and offer peer-based learning opportunities. Designing and promoting PrEP strategies for young Black women should involve close consultation with these consumers.

评估非口服PrEP替代方案在美国南部的年轻黑人妇女。
美国南部的年轻黑人女性面临着很高的艾滋病负担。虽然每日口服HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)可以有效预防HIV,但黑人妇女的使用率很低。美国南部年轻黑人女性对新兴PrEP产品的接受程度和使用意向尚不清楚。非口服PrEP替代品可以解决PrEP吸收的挑战并减少健康差距。我们对佐治亚州亚特兰大市18-34岁的黑人女性进行了虚拟半结构化访谈;巴吞鲁日,洛杉矶;和Jackson, MS,探讨他们对三种新兴PrEP产品的看法:长效注射,皮下植入,以及双重用途避孕和HIV预防阴道内环。从2021年1月到10月进行了75次访谈,使用NVivo软件进行归纳主题分析。大多数参与者对使用药物预防艾滋病毒持开放态度。阴道内环是最受欢迎的,主要是由于它的双重功能,尽管它也经常被拒绝。长效注射是第二种最受欢迎和最不被拒绝的注射方式,被认为是侵入性最小的。皮肤植入是最不受欢迎和最拒绝的,被认为是最具侵入性的。我们的研究结果强调需要多种PrEP选择来满足个人偏好。详细的描述、指导和体验式学习方法对于选择非口服PrEP模式至关重要。从业者应该解决问题并提供基于同行的学习机会。为年轻黑人妇女设计和推广预防PrEP策略应与这些消费者密切协商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信