Superior effect of mini-implant anchorage in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_35_24
Vo Thi Thuy Hong, Tran Thi Kim Lien, Pham Anh Tuan, Hoang Viet
{"title":"Superior effect of mini-implant anchorage in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.","authors":"Vo Thi Thuy Hong, Tran Thi Kim Lien, Pham Anh Tuan, Hoang Viet","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_35_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of mini-implant (MI) anchorage versus conventional anchorage for the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 64 patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) 32 patients underwent conventional anchorage, and 2) 32 patients underwent MI anchorage. Cephalometric radiographs were taken pre-treatment, and the data were compared with post-treatment measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age and gender distribution between the conventional and MI anchorage groups was similar, and the differences were statistically significant. The SNA and SNB angles post-treatment were reduced compared to pre-treatment measurements in both groups. The MI anchorage demonstrated a superior subsidence effect, reducing the level of forward displacement of the first molars in the maxilla. The MI group also exhibited less extrusion of the molars compared to the conventional group. In skeletal class II cases, especially in patients with a high mandibular angle using MI anchorage helped prevent the mandible from rotating counterclockwise, thus improving aesthetics rather than worsening them after treatment. In 75% of the cases in the MI anchorage group, the outcome was assessed as \"greatly improved\" based on the PAR index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MI anchorage was more effective than conventional anchorage. It allows for greater posterior movement and intrusion of the maxillary incisors while maintaining or rotating the mandibular plane counterclockwise.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_35_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of mini-implant (MI) anchorage versus conventional anchorage for the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 64 patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) 32 patients underwent conventional anchorage, and 2) 32 patients underwent MI anchorage. Cephalometric radiographs were taken pre-treatment, and the data were compared with post-treatment measurements.

Results: The age and gender distribution between the conventional and MI anchorage groups was similar, and the differences were statistically significant. The SNA and SNB angles post-treatment were reduced compared to pre-treatment measurements in both groups. The MI anchorage demonstrated a superior subsidence effect, reducing the level of forward displacement of the first molars in the maxilla. The MI group also exhibited less extrusion of the molars compared to the conventional group. In skeletal class II cases, especially in patients with a high mandibular angle using MI anchorage helped prevent the mandible from rotating counterclockwise, thus improving aesthetics rather than worsening them after treatment. In 75% of the cases in the MI anchorage group, the outcome was assessed as "greatly improved" based on the PAR index.

Conclusions: MI anchorage was more effective than conventional anchorage. It allows for greater posterior movement and intrusion of the maxillary incisors while maintaining or rotating the mandibular plane counterclockwise.

微型种植体固定在治疗骨骼类 II 型错牙合畸形中的卓越效果。
目的:评价微型种植体(MI)支抗与常规支抗治疗骨骼ⅱ类错牙合的疗效。材料与方法:对64例骨骼ⅱ类错颌畸形患者进行研究。将患者分为两组:1)常规支抗32例,2)MI支抗32例。治疗前拍摄头颅x线片,并与治疗后测量数据进行比较。结果:常规支抗组与心肌梗死支抗组年龄、性别分布相似,差异有统计学意义。两组治疗后的SNA和SNB角度均比治疗前测量值减小。MI支抗表现出良好的下沉效果,减少了上颌第一磨牙的前移水平。与常规组相比,MI组也表现出较少的磨牙挤压。在骨骼II类病例中,特别是下颌角高的患者,使用MI支抗有助于防止下颌逆时针旋转,从而改善治疗后的美观性而不是使其恶化。在75%的MI支具组病例中,根据PAR指数,结果被评估为“大大改善”。结论:MI锚固比常规锚固更有效。它允许更大的后运动和上颌门牙的侵入,同时保持或旋转下颌平面逆时针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信