The early and mid-term outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection patients with ECMO.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479
Qingqing Meng, Hongkai Jiang, Tianbao Li, Shanwen Pang, Chengbin Zhou, Huanlei Huang, Tucheng Sun, Jinlin Wu
{"title":"The early and mid-term outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection patients with ECMO.","authors":"Qingqing Meng, Hongkai Jiang, Tianbao Li, Shanwen Pang, Chengbin Zhou, Huanlei Huang, Tucheng Sun, Jinlin Wu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) poses significant challenges in cardiovascular management due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is a severe complication following ATAAD repair that complicates postoperative recovery. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a potential life-saving intervention in this context, yet the specific outcomes related to ECMO in ATAAD patients remain insufficiently studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study reviewed the medical records of 479 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery from September 2017 to June 2021. Patients were stratified into those requiring postoperative ECMO support and those who did not. Data collected included demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the cohort, 19 patients (4.0%) required ECMO support. The ECMO group exhibited significantly higher mortality rates (57.9% vs. 5.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and increased complications, including a higher rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (84.2% vs. 24.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and prolonged ICU stays (14.5 days vs. 7.6 days, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Survival analysis demonstrated a stark contrast in 3-year survival rates, with 36.8% for the ECMO group vs. 92.8% for non-ECMO patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECMO can be a crucial intervention for ATAAD patients suffering from PCS; however, it is associated with significantly higher mortality and complications. Despite lower long-term survival rates compared to non-ECMO patients, ECMO may offer a survival benefit as a salvage therapy. Interpretation is limited by the retrospective single-center design, small ECMO cohort size, and lack of post-discharge quality-of-life data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1509479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1509479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) poses significant challenges in cardiovascular management due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is a severe complication following ATAAD repair that complicates postoperative recovery. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a potential life-saving intervention in this context, yet the specific outcomes related to ECMO in ATAAD patients remain insufficiently studied.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study reviewed the medical records of 479 patients who underwent ATAAD surgery from September 2017 to June 2021. Patients were stratified into those requiring postoperative ECMO support and those who did not. Data collected included demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Of the cohort, 19 patients (4.0%) required ECMO support. The ECMO group exhibited significantly higher mortality rates (57.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001) and increased complications, including a higher rate of continuous renal replacement therapy (84.2% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.001) and prolonged ICU stays (14.5 days vs. 7.6 days, p = 0.009). Survival analysis demonstrated a stark contrast in 3-year survival rates, with 36.8% for the ECMO group vs. 92.8% for non-ECMO patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: ECMO can be a crucial intervention for ATAAD patients suffering from PCS; however, it is associated with significantly higher mortality and complications. Despite lower long-term survival rates compared to non-ECMO patients, ECMO may offer a survival benefit as a salvage therapy. Interpretation is limited by the retrospective single-center design, small ECMO cohort size, and lack of post-discharge quality-of-life data.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信