Differences between Current Clinical Practice and Evidence-Based Guideline Recommendations Regarding Tocolysis - an Austria-wide Survey.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2446-1828
Sabine Enengl, Werner Rath, Sven Kehl, Peter Oppelt, Andreas Mayr, Annika Stroemer, Teresa Eichinger, Julia Lastinger, Patrick Stelzl
{"title":"Differences between Current Clinical Practice and Evidence-Based Guideline Recommendations Regarding Tocolysis - an Austria-wide Survey.","authors":"Sabine Enengl, Werner Rath, Sven Kehl, Peter Oppelt, Andreas Mayr, Annika Stroemer, Teresa Eichinger, Julia Lastinger, Patrick Stelzl","doi":"10.1055/a-2446-1828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the adherence of Austrian obstetricians to national guideline recommendations by investigating data on the current practice of tocolysis regarding indications, timing and monitoring of tocolysis, choice of tocolytics and serious side effects, maintenance tocolysis, support of decision-making and recommendations at patient's discharge from the hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>78 obstetric departments in Austria were invited to participate in a nationwide survey between June 5 <sup>th</sup> and August 31 <sup>st</sup> 2023 by answering a web-based questionnaire about clinical standards. The survey was conducted approximately one year after implementation of the AWMF Guideline \"Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth\" 015‑025. Collected data were analyzed descriptively by performing measures of frequency. Fisher's exact test was used for group comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 69.2% (33.3% perinatal centers, 66.7% standard care). The most important indication of tocolysis were ≥ 4 contractions within 20 minutes of CTG tracing, as stated by 26 (48.1%) of the respondents; the AWMF Guideline 015‑025 (2022) was the most important decision-making support for tocolytic treatment (61.1%). 19 (35.2%) of obstetric units started tocolysis earliest at 23 + 0 weeks of gestation. Atosiban was the first-line tocolytic drug used by 43 (79.6%) of obstetric units, followed by nifedipine (n = 7, 13.0%); 49 of 54 obstetric units (90.7%) stated to perform maintenance tocolysis, among these 46 (93.9%) not routinely but on special indications (e.g. placenta previa). Serious side effects were observed by 77.8% of the respondents, mostly associated with the use of hexoprenaline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey revealed considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice in Austrian hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 1","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2446-1828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the adherence of Austrian obstetricians to national guideline recommendations by investigating data on the current practice of tocolysis regarding indications, timing and monitoring of tocolysis, choice of tocolytics and serious side effects, maintenance tocolysis, support of decision-making and recommendations at patient's discharge from the hospital.

Materials and methods: 78 obstetric departments in Austria were invited to participate in a nationwide survey between June 5 th and August 31 st 2023 by answering a web-based questionnaire about clinical standards. The survey was conducted approximately one year after implementation of the AWMF Guideline "Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth" 015‑025. Collected data were analyzed descriptively by performing measures of frequency. Fisher's exact test was used for group comparison.

Results: The response rate was 69.2% (33.3% perinatal centers, 66.7% standard care). The most important indication of tocolysis were ≥ 4 contractions within 20 minutes of CTG tracing, as stated by 26 (48.1%) of the respondents; the AWMF Guideline 015‑025 (2022) was the most important decision-making support for tocolytic treatment (61.1%). 19 (35.2%) of obstetric units started tocolysis earliest at 23 + 0 weeks of gestation. Atosiban was the first-line tocolytic drug used by 43 (79.6%) of obstetric units, followed by nifedipine (n = 7, 13.0%); 49 of 54 obstetric units (90.7%) stated to perform maintenance tocolysis, among these 46 (93.9%) not routinely but on special indications (e.g. placenta previa). Serious side effects were observed by 77.8% of the respondents, mostly associated with the use of hexoprenaline.

Conclusions: Our survey revealed considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice in Austrian hospitals.

当前临床实践和基于证据的指南建议之间的差异——奥地利范围内的调查。
前言:为了评估奥地利产科医生对国家指南建议的依从性,通过调查数据,目前的实践中,关于适应证,时间和监测的胎压,选择的胎压和严重的副作用,维持胎压,支持决策和患者出院时的建议。材料和方法:在2023年6月5日至8月31日期间,奥地利78个产科部门被邀请参加了一项全国性的调查,通过回答一份关于临床标准的网络问卷。该调查是在AWMF指南“预防和治疗早产”(2015 - 2025)实施大约一年后进行的。收集的数据通过执行频率测量进行描述性分析。采用Fisher精确检验进行组间比较。结果:有效率为69.2%(围产儿中心33.3%,标准护理66.7%)。26例(48.1%)的应答者表示,CTG追踪后20分钟内宫缩≥4次是最重要的胎崩指征;AWMF指南015 - 025(2022)是抗早产治疗最重要的决策支持(61.1%)。19个(35.2%)产科单位在妊娠23 + 0周时开始最早进行缩胎。阿托西班是43个(79.6%)产科单位使用的一线抗早产药物,其次是硝苯地平(n = 7, 13.0%);54个产科单位中有49个(90.7%)表示实施维持性催产,其中46个(93.9%)不是常规的,而是根据特殊适应症(如前置胎盘)。77.8%的受访患者出现严重副作用,主要与己丙肾上腺素的使用有关。结论:我们的调查显示在奥地利医院的循证指南建议和日常临床实践之间存在相当大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
828
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast obstetrics and perinatal medicine, reproductive medicine, and urogynecology. GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles. In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information. Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信