An accelerated deep learning model can accurately identify clinically important humeral and scapular landmarks on plain radiographs obtained before and after anatomic arthroplasty.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06401-3
William L Crutcher, Ishan Dane, Anastasia J Whitson, Frederick A Matsen Iii, Jason E Hsu
{"title":"An accelerated deep learning model can accurately identify clinically important humeral and scapular landmarks on plain radiographs obtained before and after anatomic arthroplasty.","authors":"William L Crutcher, Ishan Dane, Anastasia J Whitson, Frederick A Matsen Iii, Jason E Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06401-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate identification of radiographic landmarks is fundamental to characterizing glenohumeral relationships before and sequentially after shoulder arthroplasty, but manual annotation of these radiographs is laborious. We report on the use of artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision and deep learning models (DLMs), in determining the accuracy of DLM-identified and surgeon identified (SI) landmarks before and after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>240 true anteroposterior radiographs were annotated using 11 standard osseous landmarks to train a deep learning model. Radiographs were modified to allow for a training model consisting of 2,260 images. The accuracy of DLM landmarks was compared to manually annotated radiographs using 60 radiographs not used in the training model. In addition, we also performed 14 different measurements of component positioning and compared these to measurements made based on DLM landmarks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean deviation between DLM vs. SI cortical landmarks was 1.9 ± 1.9 mm. Scapular landmarks had slightly lower deviations compared to humeral landmarks (1.5 ± 1.8 mm vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.001). The DLM was also found to be accurate with respect to 14 measures of scapular, humeral, and glenohumeral measurements with a mean deviation of 2.9 ± 2.7 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An accelerated deep learning model using a base of only 240 annotated images was able to achieve low levels of deviation in identifying common humeral and scapular landmarks on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The reliability and efficiency of this deep learning model represents a powerful tool to analyze preoperative and postoperative radiographs while avoiding human observer bias.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"455-460"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06401-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate identification of radiographic landmarks is fundamental to characterizing glenohumeral relationships before and sequentially after shoulder arthroplasty, but manual annotation of these radiographs is laborious. We report on the use of artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision and deep learning models (DLMs), in determining the accuracy of DLM-identified and surgeon identified (SI) landmarks before and after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Materials & methods: 240 true anteroposterior radiographs were annotated using 11 standard osseous landmarks to train a deep learning model. Radiographs were modified to allow for a training model consisting of 2,260 images. The accuracy of DLM landmarks was compared to manually annotated radiographs using 60 radiographs not used in the training model. In addition, we also performed 14 different measurements of component positioning and compared these to measurements made based on DLM landmarks.

Results: The mean deviation between DLM vs. SI cortical landmarks was 1.9 ± 1.9 mm. Scapular landmarks had slightly lower deviations compared to humeral landmarks (1.5 ± 1.8 mm vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.001). The DLM was also found to be accurate with respect to 14 measures of scapular, humeral, and glenohumeral measurements with a mean deviation of 2.9 ± 2.7 mm.

Conclusions: An accelerated deep learning model using a base of only 240 annotated images was able to achieve low levels of deviation in identifying common humeral and scapular landmarks on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The reliability and efficiency of this deep learning model represents a powerful tool to analyze preoperative and postoperative radiographs while avoiding human observer bias.

Level of evidence: IV.

加速深度学习模型可以准确识别解剖关节置换术前后获得的x线平片上临床上重要的肱骨和肩胛骨地标。
目的:准确识别x线片标志是肩关节置换术前后肩关节关系特征的基础,但手工注释这些x线片是费力的。我们报告了人工智能的使用,特别是计算机视觉和深度学习模型(DLMs),在确定解剖肩关节置换术前后dlm识别和外科医生识别(SI)地标的准确性。材料与方法:使用11个标准骨标记对240张真实正位x线片进行注释,以训练深度学习模型。对x光片进行了修改,以允许由2260张图像组成的训练模型。使用60张未在训练模型中使用的x光片,将DLM地标的准确性与手动注释的x光片进行比较。此外,我们还进行了14种不同的组件定位测量,并将这些测量与基于DLM地标的测量进行了比较。结果:DLM与SI皮质标志的平均偏差为1.9±1.9 mm。肩胛骨标志的偏差略低于肱骨标志(1.5±1.8 mm vs. 2.1±2.0 mm)。结论:使用仅240张带注释的图像为基础的加速深度学习模型能够在术前和术后x线片上识别常见的肱骨和肩胛骨标志时达到低水平的偏差。这种深度学习模型的可靠性和效率是分析术前和术后x光片的强大工具,同时避免了人为观察者的偏见。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信