The prognostic value of pulmonary hypertension in intensive care unit patients from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC).

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Huibiao Deng, Peng Wang, Minxing Liu
{"title":"The prognostic value of pulmonary hypertension in intensive care unit patients from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC).","authors":"Huibiao Deng, Peng Wang, Minxing Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03301-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on critically ill patients has not been fully understood. Our objective was to explore the possible relationship between PH and the outcomes in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, and to determine risk factors of in-hospital mortality of ICU PH patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was used. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of ICU patients with or without PH were compared. The primary outcome was the in-hospital-mortality, and secondary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42,255 patients were included in the study, of which 1,210 patients had a diagnosis of PH and 4,262 patients died during the hospital stay. In-hospital mortality in the PH and non-PH groups were 15.1% and 9.9% respectively (P < 0.01). The length of stay in ICU and in hospital among ICU PH patients were longer than those without (P < 0.01), and PH group also showed higher 28-day mortality (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that PH was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in critical ill patients [OR = 1.22, (95%CI: 1.02-1.46), P = 0.033]. Oxford Acute Severity of Illness (OASIS) [OR = 1.10, (95%CI: 1.08-1.12), P < 0.01] anion gap [OR = 1.07, (95%CI: 1.04-1.11), P < 0.01], and Charlson's score [OR = 1.09, (95%CI: 1.03-1.16), P < 0.01] were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality among ICU PH patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PH diangsoed in the ICU setting has unfavorable clinical outcomes. The Bigger the value of OASIS score, anion gap, Charlson's score were the predictors for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with PH.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03301-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on critically ill patients has not been fully understood. Our objective was to explore the possible relationship between PH and the outcomes in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, and to determine risk factors of in-hospital mortality of ICU PH patients.

Methods: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was used. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of ICU patients with or without PH were compared. The primary outcome was the in-hospital-mortality, and secondary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 42,255 patients were included in the study, of which 1,210 patients had a diagnosis of PH and 4,262 patients died during the hospital stay. In-hospital mortality in the PH and non-PH groups were 15.1% and 9.9% respectively (P < 0.01). The length of stay in ICU and in hospital among ICU PH patients were longer than those without (P < 0.01), and PH group also showed higher 28-day mortality (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that PH was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in critical ill patients [OR = 1.22, (95%CI: 1.02-1.46), P = 0.033]. Oxford Acute Severity of Illness (OASIS) [OR = 1.10, (95%CI: 1.08-1.12), P < 0.01] anion gap [OR = 1.07, (95%CI: 1.04-1.11), P < 0.01], and Charlson's score [OR = 1.09, (95%CI: 1.03-1.16), P < 0.01] were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality among ICU PH patients.

Conclusions: PH diangsoed in the ICU setting has unfavorable clinical outcomes. The Bigger the value of OASIS score, anion gap, Charlson's score were the predictors for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with PH.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信