Recurrences and rechallenges of suspected drugs in patients with epidermal necrolysis.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Thomas Bettuzzi, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Haudrey Assier, Laura Pina Vegas, Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro, Emilie Sbidian
{"title":"Recurrences and rechallenges of suspected drugs in patients with epidermal necrolysis.","authors":"Thomas Bettuzzi, Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes, Haudrey Assier, Laura Pina Vegas, Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro, Emilie Sbidian","doi":"10.1093/ced/llae553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidermal necrolysis (EN) is a rare and severe condition characterized by diffuse skin and mucosal detachment and mainly induced by drugs. The literature is scarce regarding the rate of recurrences and culprit drug re-exposure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the rate of EN recurrences and to examine re-exposure to high-notoriety drugs in patients with EN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the French health system database and included all patients with EN. Suspected drugs were assessed at the onset of EN. The primary outcome was the rate of EN recurrence. Secondary outcomes were re-exposure or cross-exposure to high-notoriety drugs (exposure to a drug of the same family) after the acute stage of EN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1203 of 1440 patients (83.5%) survived the acute stage, with 27 patients (2.2%, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.2) meeting the recurrence criteria. In patients with allopurinol as the suspected drug, 10 of 77 (13%) were cross-exposed to febuxostat, without recurrence. Similarly, in patients with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine as the suspected drug, 2 of 26 (8%) were cross-exposed to lamotrigine, without recurrence. Conversely, 12 of 38 (32%) and 16 of 37 (43%) patients were respectively re-exposed to pantoprazole and esomeprazole when initially suspected, and 12 of 42 (29%) were re-exposed to amoxicillin. Only one recurrence was noted in a patient re-exposed to pantoprazole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with EN, the rate of recurrence seems low, contrasting with several re-exposures to beta-lactam antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors when initially suspected. Although we cannot exclude that the suspected drugs were not the responsible ones for several patients, future studies should assess the possible existence of transient risk factors inducing EN.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1116-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epidermal necrolysis (EN) is a rare and severe condition characterized by diffuse skin and mucosal detachment and mainly induced by drugs. The literature is scarce regarding the rate of recurrences and culprit drug re-exposure.

Objectives: To assess the rate of EN recurrences and to examine re-exposure to high-notoriety drugs in patients with EN.

Methods: We used the French health system database and included all patients with EN. Suspected drugs were assessed at the onset of EN. The primary outcome was the rate of EN recurrence. Secondary outcomes were re-exposure or cross-exposure to high-notoriety drugs (exposure to a drug of the same family) after the acute stage of EN.

Results: In total, 1203 of 1440 patients (83.5%) survived the acute stage, with 27 patients (2.2%, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.2) meeting the recurrence criteria. In patients with allopurinol as the suspected drug, 10 of 77 (13%) were cross-exposed to febuxostat, without recurrence. Similarly, in patients with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine as the suspected drug, 2 of 26 (8%) were cross-exposed to lamotrigine, without recurrence. Conversely, 12 of 38 (32%) and 16 of 37 (43%) patients were respectively re-exposed to pantoprazole and esomeprazole when initially suspected, and 12 of 42 (29%) were re-exposed to amoxicillin. Only one recurrence was noted in a patient re-exposed to pantoprazole.

Conclusions: Among patients with EN, the rate of recurrence seems low, contrasting with several re-exposures to beta-lactam antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors when initially suspected. Although we cannot exclude that the suspected drugs were not the responsible ones for several patients, future studies should assess the possible existence of transient risk factors inducing EN.

表皮坏死松解患者可疑药物的复发与再挑战。
背景:表皮坏死松解症(Epidermal necrolysis, EN)是一种罕见且严重的疾病,以弥漫性皮肤和粘膜脱离为特征,主要由药物引起。关于复发率和罪魁祸首药物再暴露的文献很少。目的:了解EN患者的复发率及再接触高恶名药物情况。方法:我们使用法国卫生系统数据库,纳入所有EN患者。在EN发病时对疑似药物进行评估。主要观察指标为EN复发率。次要结局是EN急性期后高恶名药物再暴露或交叉暴露,即暴露于同一家族的药物。结果:1440例患者中有1203例(83.5%)急性期存活,27例(2.2% (CI95%: 1.5 ~ 3.2))符合复发标准。在疑似用药为别嘌呤醇的患者中,10/77(13.0%)交叉暴露于非布司他,无复发。同样,在疑似卡马西平/奥卡西平的患者中,2/26(7.6%)交叉暴露于拉莫三嗪,无复发。相反,12/38(31.5%)和16/37(43.2%)的患者在最初怀疑时再次暴露于泮托拉唑和埃索美拉唑,12/42(28.6%)的患者再次暴露于阿莫西林。再次接触泮托拉唑的患者中只有一例复发。结论:在EN患者中,与最初怀疑使用内酰胺类抗生素和质子泵抑制剂时多次再次暴露相比,复发率似乎很低。虽然我们不能排除这些疑似药物并非部分患者的致病原因,但未来的研究应评估是否存在诱发EN的短暂危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信