Influence of Regular Statin Intake on Prostate-Specific Antigen Values, Prostate Cancer Incidence and Overall Survival in a Prospective Screening Trial (ERSPC Aarau).

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70485
Alkiviadis Papagiannakis, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Stephen F Wyler, Ashkan Mortezavi, Lukas Manka, Marian S Wettstein, Rainer Grobholz, Angelika Hammerer-Lercher, Daniel Eberli, Lukas Werner Prause
{"title":"Influence of Regular Statin Intake on Prostate-Specific Antigen Values, Prostate Cancer Incidence and Overall Survival in a Prospective Screening Trial (ERSPC Aarau).","authors":"Alkiviadis Papagiannakis, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Stephen F Wyler, Ashkan Mortezavi, Lukas Manka, Marian S Wettstein, Rainer Grobholz, Angelika Hammerer-Lercher, Daniel Eberli, Lukas Werner Prause","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While statins have demonstrated a variety of antineoplastic effects in preclinical studies, several retrospective clinical studies and observational studies have not shown a consistent chemopreventive benefit against prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, in this population-based cohort study, we examined the association of statin intake on prostate specific antigen (PSA) values and risk of development of PCa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>N = 4,314 men from the Swiss section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) were evaluated. N = 761 men were statin users [Stat+]. The median follow-up was 9.6 years. A transrectal prostate biopsy was performed in men with a PSA-level ≥ 3 ng/mL. Mortality and incidence data was obtained through registry linkages. PCa incidence, total serum PSA level, free-to-total PSA level, and overall survival were compared between [Stat+] and [Stat-] patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total PSA values were significantly lower in [Stat+] patients at baseline (1.5 vs. 1.8 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and at last follow-up (1.8 vs. 2.1 ng/mL, p < 0.001). PCa detection during the follow-up period was significantly associated with baseline PSA. The overall incidence of PCa showed no statistical difference among [Stat+] and [Stat-] groups (7.4% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.08), indicating that statin use had no effect on the risk of developing PCa during follow-up. [Stat+] patients had a significantly higher overall mortality risk compared to [Stat-] patients (HR 2.04, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A significant risk reduction in the development of PCa in [Stat+] patients was not found. We did observe lower PSA values among [Stat+] patients, compared to [Stat-] patients, with an increasing difference during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"e70485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While statins have demonstrated a variety of antineoplastic effects in preclinical studies, several retrospective clinical studies and observational studies have not shown a consistent chemopreventive benefit against prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, in this population-based cohort study, we examined the association of statin intake on prostate specific antigen (PSA) values and risk of development of PCa.

Method: N = 4,314 men from the Swiss section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) were evaluated. N = 761 men were statin users [Stat+]. The median follow-up was 9.6 years. A transrectal prostate biopsy was performed in men with a PSA-level ≥ 3 ng/mL. Mortality and incidence data was obtained through registry linkages. PCa incidence, total serum PSA level, free-to-total PSA level, and overall survival were compared between [Stat+] and [Stat-] patients.

Results: Total PSA values were significantly lower in [Stat+] patients at baseline (1.5 vs. 1.8 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and at last follow-up (1.8 vs. 2.1 ng/mL, p < 0.001). PCa detection during the follow-up period was significantly associated with baseline PSA. The overall incidence of PCa showed no statistical difference among [Stat+] and [Stat-] groups (7.4% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.08), indicating that statin use had no effect on the risk of developing PCa during follow-up. [Stat+] patients had a significantly higher overall mortality risk compared to [Stat-] patients (HR 2.04, p < 0.001).

Discussion: A significant risk reduction in the development of PCa in [Stat+] patients was not found. We did observe lower PSA values among [Stat+] patients, compared to [Stat-] patients, with an increasing difference during follow-up.

在一项前瞻性筛选试验(ERSPC Aarau)中,定期摄入他汀类药物对前列腺特异性抗原值、前列腺癌发病率和总生存率的影响。
目的:虽然他汀类药物在临床前研究中显示出多种抗肿瘤作用,但几项回顾性临床研究和观察性研究并未显示出对前列腺癌(PCa)的一致化学预防益处。因此,在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们研究了他汀类药物摄入量与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值和PCa发生风险的关系。方法:对来自欧洲前列腺癌随机筛查研究(ERSPC)瑞士分部的4314名男性进行评估。N = 761名男性是他汀类药物使用者[Stat+]。中位随访时间为9.6年。psa水平≥3 ng/mL的男性行经直肠前列腺活检。死亡率和发病率数据是通过登记联系获得的。比较[Stat+]和[Stat-]患者的PCa发病率、血清总PSA水平、游离总PSA水平和总生存率。结果:[Stat+]患者在基线时的总PSA值显著降低(1.5 vs. 1.8 ng/mL, p)。讨论:未发现[Stat+]患者发生PCa的风险显著降低。我们确实观察到[Stat+]患者的PSA值较[Stat-]患者低,在随访期间差异越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信