Research Progress and Perspectives on Anti-Poisoning Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Fuel Cells

IF 12.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Small Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1002/smll.202411049
Zhixu Chen, Chengyong Shu, Zhuofan Gan, Jingwen Cao, Peixi Qiu, Xiaohui Sun, Chengwei Deng, Yuping Wu, Wei Tang
{"title":"Research Progress and Perspectives on Anti-Poisoning Hydrogen Oxidation Reaction Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Fuel Cells","authors":"Zhixu Chen,&nbsp;Chengyong Shu,&nbsp;Zhuofan Gan,&nbsp;Jingwen Cao,&nbsp;Peixi Qiu,&nbsp;Xiaohui Sun,&nbsp;Chengwei Deng,&nbsp;Yuping Wu,&nbsp;Wei Tang","doi":"10.1002/smll.202411049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As global demand for clean and sustainable energy continues to rise, fuel cell technology has seen rapid advancement. However, the presence of trace impurities like carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) in hydrogen fuel can significantly deactivate the anode by blocking its active sites, leading to reduced performance. Developing electrocatalysts that are resistant to CO and H₂S poisoning has therefore become a critical priority. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the poisoning mechanisms of CO and H₂S and reviews the key strategies developed over the past few decades to enhance the impurity tolerance of anode electrocatalysts. It begins by examining the differences in hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) mechanisms in acidic and alkaline environments, focusing on the roles of hydrogen binding energy (HBE) and hydroxide binding energy (OHBE). Next, it outlines three main approaches to mitigate CO poisoning: (I) bifunctional mechanisms, (II) direct mechanisms, and (III) constructing protective blocking layers. The review then shifts to strategies for countering H₂S poisoning, emphasizing both electrocatalyst design and structural improvements in fuel cells. Finally, the paper highlights recent advances in anti-poisoning electrocatalysts, discusses their applications and limitations, and identifies the key challenges and future opportunities for further research in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":228,"journal":{"name":"Small","volume":"21 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smll.202411049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global demand for clean and sustainable energy continues to rise, fuel cell technology has seen rapid advancement. However, the presence of trace impurities like carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) in hydrogen fuel can significantly deactivate the anode by blocking its active sites, leading to reduced performance. Developing electrocatalysts that are resistant to CO and H₂S poisoning has therefore become a critical priority. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the poisoning mechanisms of CO and H₂S and reviews the key strategies developed over the past few decades to enhance the impurity tolerance of anode electrocatalysts. It begins by examining the differences in hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) mechanisms in acidic and alkaline environments, focusing on the roles of hydrogen binding energy (HBE) and hydroxide binding energy (OHBE). Next, it outlines three main approaches to mitigate CO poisoning: (I) bifunctional mechanisms, (II) direct mechanisms, and (III) constructing protective blocking layers. The review then shifts to strategies for countering H₂S poisoning, emphasizing both electrocatalyst design and structural improvements in fuel cells. Finally, the paper highlights recent advances in anti-poisoning electrocatalysts, discusses their applications and limitations, and identifies the key challenges and future opportunities for further research in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氢燃料电池抗中毒氢氧化反应电催化剂的研究进展与展望
随着全球对清洁和可持续能源需求的持续增长,燃料电池技术得到了快速发展。然而,氢燃料中微量杂质(如一氧化碳(CO)和硫化氢(H₂S))的存在会通过阻断阳极的活性位点而显著地使阳极失活,从而导致性能下降。因此,开发能抵抗CO和H₂S中毒的电催化剂成为当务之急。本文全面分析了CO和H₂S的中毒机理,综述了近几十年来提高阳极电催化剂杂质耐受性的关键策略。首先研究了酸性和碱性环境下氢氧化反应(HOR)机制的差异,重点研究了氢结合能(HBE)和氢氧化物结合能(OHBE)的作用。接下来,它概述了减轻CO中毒的三种主要方法:(I)双功能机制,(II)直接机制和(III)构建保护阻塞层。然后,回顾转向对抗H₂S中毒的策略,强调电催化剂设计和燃料电池的结构改进。最后,本文重点介绍了抗中毒电催化剂的最新进展,讨论了它们的应用和局限性,并确定了该领域进一步研究的关键挑战和未来机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Small
Small 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Small serves as an exceptional platform for both experimental and theoretical studies in fundamental and applied interdisciplinary research at the nano- and microscale. The journal offers a compelling mix of peer-reviewed Research Articles, Reviews, Perspectives, and Comments. With a remarkable 2022 Journal Impact Factor of 13.3 (Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics, 2023), Small remains among the top multidisciplinary journals, covering a wide range of topics at the interface of materials science, chemistry, physics, engineering, medicine, and biology. Small's readership includes biochemists, biologists, biomedical scientists, chemists, engineers, information technologists, materials scientists, physicists, and theoreticians alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信