The response of soil organic carbon sequestration to organic materials addition in saline-alkali soil: from the perspective of soil aggregate structure and organic carbon component
{"title":"The response of soil organic carbon sequestration to organic materials addition in saline-alkali soil: from the perspective of soil aggregate structure and organic carbon component","authors":"Liuyu Zhang, Mengmeng Chen, Yutong Zong, Zeqiang Sun, Yuyi Li, Xiaodong Ding, Shirong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07163-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Promoting soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration is the key to improving soil quality. Adding organic materials is a common practice to promote SOC sequestration. However, the mechanism of SOC sequestration in saline-alkali soil with different organic materials addition is still unclear.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Field experiment was conducted: (1) Control, no fertilization; (2) NPK, only mineral fertilizer addition; (3) OF, NPK plus 2000 kg C ha<sup>-1</sup> addition of organic fertilizer; (4) MS, NPK plus 2000 kg C ha<sup>-1</sup> addition of maize straw.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Compared with NPK treatment, the mean weight diameter (MWD) in OF and MS treatments was increased by 23.08% and 11.54%, respectively, which was due to the reduction of exchangeable sodium saturation percentage. Exchangeable calcium and magnesium were positively correlated with MWD, and their contents in OF treatment were 6.89-32.05% higher than those in MS treatment. Meanwhile, MWD was positively correlated with SOC stock, and small macro-aggregates contributed the most to SOC. Compared with NPK treatment, the ratio of mineral-associated organic carbon to particular organic carbon in MS and OF treatments were increased by 34.06% and 80.88%, respectively. Exchangeable magnesium and calcium could bind with polysaccharide, carboxyl and phenol to form complex under organic materials addition. Hence, SOC stock in OF and MS treatments was increased by 14.18% and 6.38% compared to NPK treatment, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The addition of organic materials improved the stability of aggregate structure and SOC pool in saline-alkali soil, thereby promoting SOC sequestration, in which organic fertilizer showed better effect.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07163-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims
Promoting soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration is the key to improving soil quality. Adding organic materials is a common practice to promote SOC sequestration. However, the mechanism of SOC sequestration in saline-alkali soil with different organic materials addition is still unclear.
Methods
Field experiment was conducted: (1) Control, no fertilization; (2) NPK, only mineral fertilizer addition; (3) OF, NPK plus 2000 kg C ha-1 addition of organic fertilizer; (4) MS, NPK plus 2000 kg C ha-1 addition of maize straw.
Results
Compared with NPK treatment, the mean weight diameter (MWD) in OF and MS treatments was increased by 23.08% and 11.54%, respectively, which was due to the reduction of exchangeable sodium saturation percentage. Exchangeable calcium and magnesium were positively correlated with MWD, and their contents in OF treatment were 6.89-32.05% higher than those in MS treatment. Meanwhile, MWD was positively correlated with SOC stock, and small macro-aggregates contributed the most to SOC. Compared with NPK treatment, the ratio of mineral-associated organic carbon to particular organic carbon in MS and OF treatments were increased by 34.06% and 80.88%, respectively. Exchangeable magnesium and calcium could bind with polysaccharide, carboxyl and phenol to form complex under organic materials addition. Hence, SOC stock in OF and MS treatments was increased by 14.18% and 6.38% compared to NPK treatment, respectively.
Conclusion
The addition of organic materials improved the stability of aggregate structure and SOC pool in saline-alkali soil, thereby promoting SOC sequestration, in which organic fertilizer showed better effect.
背景与目的促进土壤有机碳(SOC)的固存是改善土壤质量的关键。添加有机材料是促进有机碳固存的常用方法。然而,不同有机质添加量对盐碱土固碳机制的影响尚不清楚。方法田间试验:(1)对照,不施肥;(2) NPK,只添加矿物肥;(3) OF、NPK +添加有机肥料2000 kg C ha-1;(4)玉米秸秆添加MS、NPK + 2000 kg cha -1。结果与NPK处理相比,OF和MS处理的平均重径(MWD)分别提高了23.08%和11.54%,这是由于降低了交换钠饱和率。交换性钙、镁与随钻率呈正相关,OF处理的交换性钙、镁含量比MS处理高6.89 ~ 32.05%。同时,随钻距离与土壤有机碳储量呈正相关,且小的宏观聚集体对土壤有机碳贡献最大。与NPK处理相比,MS和of处理的矿物伴生有机碳与特定有机碳之比分别提高了34.06%和80.88%。在有机物质的作用下,交换性镁和钙可以与多糖、羧基和苯酚结合形成络合物。与NPK处理相比,有机肥处理和MS处理的土壤有机碳储量分别增加了14.18%和6.38%。结论有机物质的添加提高了盐碱土团聚体结构的稳定性和有机碳库,从而促进了有机碳的固存,其中有机肥的效果更好。图形抽象
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.