Zhuang Hong, Jing Lu, Gang Chen, Qi Tang, Heqi Sun, Ting Wei, Sitang Zhao, Jun Lu
{"title":"Health system responsiveness: comparison of different levels of medical institutions in Kunshan City, China.","authors":"Zhuang Hong, Jing Lu, Gang Chen, Qi Tang, Heqi Sun, Ting Wei, Sitang Zhao, Jun Lu","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2446693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of health system responsiveness (HSR) can improve patient satisfaction, promote health equity and enhance the quality of health services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the differences in HSR among medical institutions at different levels and in various domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-stage stratified sampling method was used to select 820 participants aged 18 years and older from Kunshan City, China. Analysis of variance was used for univariate analysis. Linear regression and ordinal logistics were applied to explore the relationship between different hospital levels and HSR. Forest plots were used to illustrate the relationship between each domain and the hospital level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationship between hospital level and HSR remained significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Compared with primary healthcare institutions, secondary hospitals had lower HSR scores (β = -1.47, 95%CI = [-2.15, -0.79], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similarly, tertiary hospitals had lower HSR scores compared with primary healthcare institutions (β = -1.54, 95%CI = [-2.39, -0.70], <i>p</i> < 0.001). The study found that attention, communication, basic amenities, social support, and the choice of healthcare providers were lower in secondary hospitals compared to primary healthcare institutions (OR < 1; <i>p</i> < 0.05). In tertiary hospitals, attention, communication, autonomy, basic amenities, social support, and the choice of healthcare provider were lower compared to primary healthcare institutions (OR < 1; <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By comparing the HSR of hospitals at different levels, the study identified areas for improvement. Particularly, urgent improvements are needed in prompt attention, communication, basic amenities, social support and the choice of healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2446693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2446693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of health system responsiveness (HSR) can improve patient satisfaction, promote health equity and enhance the quality of health services.
Objectives: To explore the differences in HSR among medical institutions at different levels and in various domains.
Methods: A multi-stage stratified sampling method was used to select 820 participants aged 18 years and older from Kunshan City, China. Analysis of variance was used for univariate analysis. Linear regression and ordinal logistics were applied to explore the relationship between different hospital levels and HSR. Forest plots were used to illustrate the relationship between each domain and the hospital level.
Results: The relationship between hospital level and HSR remained significant (p < 0.05). Compared with primary healthcare institutions, secondary hospitals had lower HSR scores (β = -1.47, 95%CI = [-2.15, -0.79], p < 0.001). Similarly, tertiary hospitals had lower HSR scores compared with primary healthcare institutions (β = -1.54, 95%CI = [-2.39, -0.70], p < 0.001). The study found that attention, communication, basic amenities, social support, and the choice of healthcare providers were lower in secondary hospitals compared to primary healthcare institutions (OR < 1; p < 0.05). In tertiary hospitals, attention, communication, autonomy, basic amenities, social support, and the choice of healthcare provider were lower compared to primary healthcare institutions (OR < 1; p < 0.05).
Conclusions: By comparing the HSR of hospitals at different levels, the study identified areas for improvement. Particularly, urgent improvements are needed in prompt attention, communication, basic amenities, social support and the choice of healthcare providers.
背景:卫生系统响应性评价(HSR)可以提高患者满意度,促进卫生公平,提高卫生服务质量。目的:探讨不同层次、不同领域医疗机构HSR的差异。方法:采用多阶段分层抽样的方法,在昆山市抽取18岁及以上年龄人群820名。单因素分析采用方差分析。采用线性回归和有序logistic方法探讨不同医院级别与高铁的关系。使用森林图来说明每个域与医院层之间的关系。结果:医院级别与高铁率之间存在显著关系(p p p p p p)。结论:通过对不同级别医院高铁率的比较,研究发现了需要改进的地方。特别是,迫切需要在及时关注、沟通、基本便利设施、社会支持和选择医疗保健提供者方面进行改进。