The feasibility of the adult age estimation 3D-CBCT method on ancient human remains.

Q3 Medicine
Ilenia Bianchi, Giulia Vitale, Martina Focardi, Emanuele Capasso, Alessandro Galli, Nicola Perrini, Emanuele Sironi, Elsa Pacciani, Vilma Pinchi
{"title":"The feasibility of the adult age estimation 3D-CBCT method on ancient human remains.","authors":"Ilenia Bianchi, Giulia Vitale, Martina Focardi, Emanuele Capasso, Alessandro Galli, Nicola Perrini, Emanuele Sironi, Elsa Pacciani, Vilma Pinchi","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14505540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The age estimation of skeletal remains still represents a central issue not only for the reconstruction of the so-called \"biological profile,\" but mostly for the palaeodemographic investigation. This research aims at verifying the feasibility of the adult age estimation method developed on living people by Pinchi et al. (2015 and 2018), for estimating the age at the death of 37 subjects from ancient populations found in two different Italian necropolis of archaeological interest (Mont'e Prama and Florence, X-IX century B.C and V-VI century A.D respectively). The method is conservative and based on a geometrical approximation of dental volumes of the upper central left incisors on CBCT scans. The statistical distribution of the age and errors followed the Bayesian approach proposed by Sironi et el. (2018) applying the \"a priori\" values according to the estimates/classification obtained with anthropological methods (morphological). Results show higher accuracy for Mont'e Prama remains than for the Florentine sample due to the different characteristics of the two ancient populations (estimates varying from 18.4 up to 28.7 years with a maximum error of 6,14 years for Mont'e Prama, and from 15.88 up to 43.37 years with a minimum error of 1 year up to a maximum error of 7,85 years for Florence). The method proposed and validated on modern living people can represent a reliable tool for estimating the age of ancient human remains with a significant palaeodemographic value for archaeologists/anthropologists. Mont'e Prama sample could be defined as a homogenous group of males aged around 20-30 years, probably warriors, soldiers, or athletes; Florentine sample as an inhomogeneous group of males and females from different families buried all together in a small area out of the city due to the probable occurrence of a special healthy emergency in the city.</p>","PeriodicalId":35728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology","volume":"42 3","pages":"39-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14505540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The age estimation of skeletal remains still represents a central issue not only for the reconstruction of the so-called "biological profile," but mostly for the palaeodemographic investigation. This research aims at verifying the feasibility of the adult age estimation method developed on living people by Pinchi et al. (2015 and 2018), for estimating the age at the death of 37 subjects from ancient populations found in two different Italian necropolis of archaeological interest (Mont'e Prama and Florence, X-IX century B.C and V-VI century A.D respectively). The method is conservative and based on a geometrical approximation of dental volumes of the upper central left incisors on CBCT scans. The statistical distribution of the age and errors followed the Bayesian approach proposed by Sironi et el. (2018) applying the "a priori" values according to the estimates/classification obtained with anthropological methods (morphological). Results show higher accuracy for Mont'e Prama remains than for the Florentine sample due to the different characteristics of the two ancient populations (estimates varying from 18.4 up to 28.7 years with a maximum error of 6,14 years for Mont'e Prama, and from 15.88 up to 43.37 years with a minimum error of 1 year up to a maximum error of 7,85 years for Florence). The method proposed and validated on modern living people can represent a reliable tool for estimating the age of ancient human remains with a significant palaeodemographic value for archaeologists/anthropologists. Mont'e Prama sample could be defined as a homogenous group of males aged around 20-30 years, probably warriors, soldiers, or athletes; Florentine sample as an inhomogeneous group of males and females from different families buried all together in a small area out of the city due to the probable occurrence of a special healthy emergency in the city.

古人类遗骸成人年龄估算3D-CBCT方法的可行性。
骨骼遗骸的年龄估计仍然是一个核心问题,不仅是对所谓的“生物剖面”的重建,而且主要是对古生物学调查。本研究旨在验证Pinchi等人(2015年和2018年)在活人身上开发的成人年龄估计方法的可行性,该方法用于估计在两个不同的意大利考古兴趣墓地(分别为公元前x - 9世纪和公元v - 6世纪的Mont'e Prama和Florence)中发现的37名古代人群的死亡年龄。该方法是保守的,并且基于CBCT扫描上左上中切牙的牙体积的几何近似。年龄和误差的统计分布遵循Sironi等人提出的贝叶斯方法。(2018)根据人类学方法(形态学)获得的估计/分类应用“先验”值。结果表明,由于两个古代种群的不同特征,Mont'e Prama遗址的精度高于佛罗伦萨样本(Mont'e Prama遗址的估计从18.4到28.7年不等,最大误差为6.14年;Florence遗址的估计从15.88到43.37年不等,最小误差为1年,最大误差为7.85年)。在现代人身上提出并验证的方法可以作为估计古代人类遗骸年龄的可靠工具,对考古学家/人类学家具有重要的古人类统计学价值。Mont'e Prama样本可以定义为年龄在20-30岁左右的同质男性群体,可能是战士、士兵或运动员;佛罗伦萨样本作为一个非同质的群体,来自不同家庭的男性和女性一起埋葬在城市外的一个小区域,因为城市可能发生特殊的突发卫生事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology
Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology is the official publication of the: INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR FORENSIC ODONTO-STOMATOLOGY (I.O.F.O.S
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信