The pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines: a retrospective clinical validation study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-03 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.7.PEDS24229
Lindsey M Freeman, Samantha Bothwell, Julia Pazniokas, Andrew Mecum, Khoa Nguyen, Tyler D Park, Megan V Ryan, Derek C Samples
{"title":"The pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines: a retrospective clinical validation study.","authors":"Lindsey M Freeman, Samantha Bothwell, Julia Pazniokas, Andrew Mecum, Khoa Nguyen, Tyler D Park, Megan V Ryan, Derek C Samples","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.PEDS24229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health concern and source of resource utilization. The aim of this study was to establish the ability of the previously published pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines (pBIG) to identify patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who might not require routine repeat neuroimaging, neurosurgical consultation, or hospital admission in a large level I and level II trauma cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients who presented with traumatic ICH between 2018 and 2022 at the included institutions were retrospectively reviewed and sorted into pBIG categories using clinical and radiographic criteria. Nonaccidental trauma was excluded. Repeat neuroimaging and results, neurosurgical intervention, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality and re-presentation to healthcare were collected as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 955 patients (median age 7.0 years, with 64.5% of patients being male) were included. Overall, 9.7% of patients had pBIG 1 injuries, 30.0% had pBIG 2 injuries, and 60.2% had pBIG 3 injuries. A total of 368 (38.5%) of patients underwent repeat neuroimaging, of whom 144 (39.1%) showed progression of hemorrhage. Neurosurgical intervention was performed in 129 (13.5%) patients, with 127 (98.4%) of them meeting pBIG 3 criteria on arrival. The two remaining patients met pBIG 2 criteria on arrival and then progressed to meet pBIG 3 criteria within 24 hours. Patient meeting pBIG 3 criteria were significantly more likely to have progression on repeat imaging, require neurosurgical intervention, and experience 30-day mortality (p < 0.001). Within the pBIG 3 cohort, there was not a significant relationship between progression on repeat imaging and the need for intervention (p = 0.61). Post hoc pairwise testing of individual radiographic pBIG groupings revealed pBIG 3 criteria for all categories except subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) to be predictive of need for neurosurgical intervention (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Algorithmic management of mild TBI is beneficial to patient care. With zero and near-zero rates of neurosurgical intervention and mortality in patients with pBIG 1 and pBIG 2 injuries, respectively, the pBIG are valid in stratifying a larger and broader population of pediatric TBI patients. In contrast to other pBIG 3-defined compartment ICHs, \"scattered\" SAH does not correlate with need for neurosurgical intervention. However, these guidelines have the ability to safely improve care and decrease unnecessary resource utilization without negatively affecting patient outcomes. Utilization of guidelines of any sort are not intended to supersede clinical judgment. Prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.PEDS24229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health concern and source of resource utilization. The aim of this study was to establish the ability of the previously published pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines (pBIG) to identify patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who might not require routine repeat neuroimaging, neurosurgical consultation, or hospital admission in a large level I and level II trauma cohort.

Methods: Pediatric patients who presented with traumatic ICH between 2018 and 2022 at the included institutions were retrospectively reviewed and sorted into pBIG categories using clinical and radiographic criteria. Nonaccidental trauma was excluded. Repeat neuroimaging and results, neurosurgical intervention, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality and re-presentation to healthcare were collected as outcomes.

Results: A cohort of 955 patients (median age 7.0 years, with 64.5% of patients being male) were included. Overall, 9.7% of patients had pBIG 1 injuries, 30.0% had pBIG 2 injuries, and 60.2% had pBIG 3 injuries. A total of 368 (38.5%) of patients underwent repeat neuroimaging, of whom 144 (39.1%) showed progression of hemorrhage. Neurosurgical intervention was performed in 129 (13.5%) patients, with 127 (98.4%) of them meeting pBIG 3 criteria on arrival. The two remaining patients met pBIG 2 criteria on arrival and then progressed to meet pBIG 3 criteria within 24 hours. Patient meeting pBIG 3 criteria were significantly more likely to have progression on repeat imaging, require neurosurgical intervention, and experience 30-day mortality (p < 0.001). Within the pBIG 3 cohort, there was not a significant relationship between progression on repeat imaging and the need for intervention (p = 0.61). Post hoc pairwise testing of individual radiographic pBIG groupings revealed pBIG 3 criteria for all categories except subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) to be predictive of need for neurosurgical intervention (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Algorithmic management of mild TBI is beneficial to patient care. With zero and near-zero rates of neurosurgical intervention and mortality in patients with pBIG 1 and pBIG 2 injuries, respectively, the pBIG are valid in stratifying a larger and broader population of pediatric TBI patients. In contrast to other pBIG 3-defined compartment ICHs, "scattered" SAH does not correlate with need for neurosurgical intervention. However, these guidelines have the ability to safely improve care and decrease unnecessary resource utilization without negatively affecting patient outcomes. Utilization of guidelines of any sort are not intended to supersede clinical judgment. Prospective studies are needed.

儿童脑损伤指南:回顾性临床验证研究。
目的:儿童创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重要的公共卫生问题和资源利用来源。本研究的目的是建立以前出版的儿科脑损伤指南(pBIG)识别创伤性颅内出血(ICH)患者的能力,这些患者可能不需要常规的重复神经影像学检查、神经外科会诊或在大型一级和二级创伤队列中住院。方法:回顾性分析2018年至2022年在纳入的机构中出现外伤性脑出血的儿科患者,并根据临床和放射学标准将其分为pBIG类别。排除非意外创伤。收集重复神经影像学和结果、神经外科干预、住院时间(LOS)、30天死亡率和再次就诊作为结果。结果:纳入了955例患者(中位年龄7.0岁,64.5%的患者为男性)。总体而言,9.7%的患者为pBIG 1型损伤,30.0%为pBIG 2型损伤,60.2%为pBIG 3型损伤。共有368例(38.5%)患者接受了重复神经影像学检查,其中144例(39.1%)出现出血进展。129例(13.5%)患者接受了神经外科干预,其中127例(98.4%)患者到达时符合pBIG 3标准。其余两名患者在到达时达到pBIG 2标准,然后在24小时内进展到满足pBIG 3标准。符合pBIG 3标准的患者更有可能在重复成像中出现进展,需要神经外科干预,并经历30天死亡率(p < 0.001)。在pBIG 3队列中,重复成像进展与干预需要之间没有显著关系(p = 0.61)。事后对个体放射学pBIG分组的两两检验显示,除蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)外,所有类别的pBIG 3标准可预测是否需要神经外科干预(p < 0.05)。结论:轻度TBI的算法管理有利于患者的护理。pBIG 1型和pBIG 2型损伤患者的神经外科干预率和死亡率分别为零和接近零,因此pBIG在更大范围的儿科TBI患者人群分层中是有效的。与其他pBIG 3定义的腔室缺血性脑出血相比,“散发性”SAH与需要神经外科干预无关。然而,这些指南有能力安全地改善护理,减少不必要的资源利用,而不会对患者的预后产生负面影响。使用任何类型的指南都不打算取代临床判断。前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信