Patients with severe mental illness in the general emergency department: Clinical characteristics, quality of care and challenges.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sharon Taub, Noa Menkes-Caspi, Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok, Shiri Kamhi-Nesher, Amir Krivoy
{"title":"Patients with severe mental illness in the general emergency department: Clinical characteristics, quality of care and challenges.","authors":"Sharon Taub, Noa Menkes-Caspi, Tom Fruchtman-Steinbok, Shiri Kamhi-Nesher, Amir Krivoy","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Morbidity and mortality rates are notably higher among individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI). People with SMI often have lower access to healthcare services, and the medical care they receive is known to be suboptimal. Consequently, treatment in an acute care setting rather than a community setting is more common. We aim to explore medical care in the emergency department (ED) for people with SMI compared to a control population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this matched cohort study, data on all adult Clalit Health Services (CHS) members who were referred to the general ED during the years 2018-2021 were extracted. Patients with SMI (ICD-10 codes for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder) were matched with a control group of ED patients without SMI in a 1:3 ratio. The two groups were compared regarding ED admission reasons, management, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample (n = 92,848) included ED patients with SMI (n = 23,212) and without (n = 69,636). The most common ED admission reasons in both groups were pain, traumatic injury, and cardiac symptoms. Patients in the SMI group had higher rates of diagnosed diabetes mellitus and obstructive pulmonary disease. ED assessment, measured by resource allocation, was less comprehensive for patients with SMI who presented with subjective complaints such as pain and weakness, while it was comparable between patients with and without SMI for other main presenting complaints. Workup for patients with SMI lasted longer and necessitated hospitalization at higher rates for most admission reasons. Mortality during the study period was almost twice as high among the SMI group (5 % vs. 2.3 %, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings indicate higher rates of morbidity and treatment complexity among patients with SMI. As expected, the mortality rate was higher in this group. An alarming gap in resource allocation for ED assessment was observed when patients presented with subjective complaints. Enhanced awareness and integrated resources in primary care are required to improve the management and physical healthcare of patients with SMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"92 ","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Morbidity and mortality rates are notably higher among individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI). People with SMI often have lower access to healthcare services, and the medical care they receive is known to be suboptimal. Consequently, treatment in an acute care setting rather than a community setting is more common. We aim to explore medical care in the emergency department (ED) for people with SMI compared to a control population.

Methods: In this matched cohort study, data on all adult Clalit Health Services (CHS) members who were referred to the general ED during the years 2018-2021 were extracted. Patients with SMI (ICD-10 codes for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder) were matched with a control group of ED patients without SMI in a 1:3 ratio. The two groups were compared regarding ED admission reasons, management, and outcomes.

Results: The total sample (n = 92,848) included ED patients with SMI (n = 23,212) and without (n = 69,636). The most common ED admission reasons in both groups were pain, traumatic injury, and cardiac symptoms. Patients in the SMI group had higher rates of diagnosed diabetes mellitus and obstructive pulmonary disease. ED assessment, measured by resource allocation, was less comprehensive for patients with SMI who presented with subjective complaints such as pain and weakness, while it was comparable between patients with and without SMI for other main presenting complaints. Workup for patients with SMI lasted longer and necessitated hospitalization at higher rates for most admission reasons. Mortality during the study period was almost twice as high among the SMI group (5 % vs. 2.3 %, p < 0.001).

Discussion: Our findings indicate higher rates of morbidity and treatment complexity among patients with SMI. As expected, the mortality rate was higher in this group. An alarming gap in resource allocation for ED assessment was observed when patients presented with subjective complaints. Enhanced awareness and integrated resources in primary care are required to improve the management and physical healthcare of patients with SMI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信