{"title":"Establishment and clinical impacts of decision-support system for older patients with aortic valve stenosis: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Sayoko Kawano, Yoko Eguchi, Azusa Oosumi, Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, Michiyo Takubo, Noriko Kimura, Naomi Nakano, Toshinobu Ryuzaki, Kentaro Hayashida, Masaki Ieda, Hiroyuki Uchida, Masaru Mimura, Daisuke Fujisawa","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Treatment decisions for severe aortic stenosis (AS) are complex, since there are two active and comparable options: transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement. The disease predominantly affects older individuals, who are frequently comorbid with from cognitive impairment. This study aimed to establish a screening-triggered system to assess the decision-making capacity of patients with AS, support their decision-making, and facilitate referrals to specialists when necessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective pre-post observational study. Relevant healthcare professionals were trained to assess and support patients' decision-making capacities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subtotals of 203 and 244 patients were enrolled before and after the implementation of the system, respectively. The requests for decision-making support significantly increased (from 1.5 % to 14.8 % of the patients). 11.5 % of the patients were identified as with declined decision-making capacity. The proportion of patients who received active treatments for AS significantly decreased from 95.0 % to 83.0 %. The nurses' documentation of patients' decision-making capacities significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This screening-triggered system identified a substantial proportion of patients with declined decision-making capacity. A significant decrease in patients receiving active treatments for AS and increased documentation of patients' decision-making capacities in nursing records were observed. A future randomized controlled is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"92 ","pages":"106-111"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Treatment decisions for severe aortic stenosis (AS) are complex, since there are two active and comparable options: transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement. The disease predominantly affects older individuals, who are frequently comorbid with from cognitive impairment. This study aimed to establish a screening-triggered system to assess the decision-making capacity of patients with AS, support their decision-making, and facilitate referrals to specialists when necessary.
Methods: This is a retrospective pre-post observational study. Relevant healthcare professionals were trained to assess and support patients' decision-making capacities.
Results: Subtotals of 203 and 244 patients were enrolled before and after the implementation of the system, respectively. The requests for decision-making support significantly increased (from 1.5 % to 14.8 % of the patients). 11.5 % of the patients were identified as with declined decision-making capacity. The proportion of patients who received active treatments for AS significantly decreased from 95.0 % to 83.0 %. The nurses' documentation of patients' decision-making capacities significantly increased.
Conclusion: This screening-triggered system identified a substantial proportion of patients with declined decision-making capacity. A significant decrease in patients receiving active treatments for AS and increased documentation of patients' decision-making capacities in nursing records were observed. A future randomized controlled is warranted.
期刊介绍:
General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.