The link between eye movements and cognitive function in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Xiao-Ting Ma, Lin-Lin Yao, Shan-Wen Liu, Xiao-Fen Weng, Run-Ying Bao, Yi-Fan Yang, Yi-Feng Li, Yan-Yun Sun, Dan Xu, Zhen-Yu Jia, Hua Hu
{"title":"The link between eye movements and cognitive function in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Xiao-Ting Ma, Lin-Lin Yao, Shan-Wen Liu, Xiao-Fen Weng, Run-Ying Bao, Yi-Fan Yang, Yi-Feng Li, Yan-Yun Sun, Dan Xu, Zhen-Yu Jia, Hua Hu","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06957-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between eye movement parameters and cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). A total of 80 patients with AD (mild and moderate) and 34 normal controls (NC) participated. Neuropsychological assessments were conducted using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), while eye movements were recorded using eye-tracking technology. Comparisons of neuropsychological scores and eye movement parameters were made across the groups, and partial correlation analysis was performed to examine associations between eye movement metrics and specific cognitive domains. No significant differences were found among the groups in pursuit and fixation tasks. However, in pro-saccade tasks, patients in the moderate AD group exhibited significantly lower accuracy and longer latency compared to those in the mild AD and NC groups. Similarly, in anti-saccade tasks, the moderate AD group showed significantly lower accuracy and error correction rates compared to the other groups. Partial correlation analysis revealed that overall cognitive function was positively associated with the accuracy of pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks, as well as the error correction rate of anti-saccade tasks, but negatively associated with pro-saccade latency. Further, orientation was negatively correlated with saccade latency and positively correlated with saccade accuracy, while visuospatial skills were positively associated with the accuracy of both saccade and anti-saccade tasks. A positive correlation was also observed between word fluency and both saccade accuracy and error correction rate. These findings indicate that eye movement parameters, particularly those related to saccade and anti-saccade tasks, are associated with various cognitive domains in mild to moderate AD patients. Eye-tracking technology may provide a convenient and non-invasive tool for assessing cognitive function and aiding in the diagnosis and evaluation of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06957-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between eye movement parameters and cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). A total of 80 patients with AD (mild and moderate) and 34 normal controls (NC) participated. Neuropsychological assessments were conducted using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), while eye movements were recorded using eye-tracking technology. Comparisons of neuropsychological scores and eye movement parameters were made across the groups, and partial correlation analysis was performed to examine associations between eye movement metrics and specific cognitive domains. No significant differences were found among the groups in pursuit and fixation tasks. However, in pro-saccade tasks, patients in the moderate AD group exhibited significantly lower accuracy and longer latency compared to those in the mild AD and NC groups. Similarly, in anti-saccade tasks, the moderate AD group showed significantly lower accuracy and error correction rates compared to the other groups. Partial correlation analysis revealed that overall cognitive function was positively associated with the accuracy of pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks, as well as the error correction rate of anti-saccade tasks, but negatively associated with pro-saccade latency. Further, orientation was negatively correlated with saccade latency and positively correlated with saccade accuracy, while visuospatial skills were positively associated with the accuracy of both saccade and anti-saccade tasks. A positive correlation was also observed between word fluency and both saccade accuracy and error correction rate. These findings indicate that eye movement parameters, particularly those related to saccade and anti-saccade tasks, are associated with various cognitive domains in mild to moderate AD patients. Eye-tracking technology may provide a convenient and non-invasive tool for assessing cognitive function and aiding in the diagnosis and evaluation of AD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信