A prospective, phase II, neoadjuvant study based on chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2- breast cancer-FINEST study.

IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Li Chen, Wen-Ya Wu, Fei Liang, Guang-Yu Liu, Ke-Da Yu, Jiong Wu, Gen-Hong Di, Lei Fan, Zhong-Hua Wang, Jun-Jie Li, Zhi-Ming Shao
{"title":"A prospective, phase II, neoadjuvant study based on chemotherapy sensitivity in HR+/HER2- breast cancer-FINEST study.","authors":"Li Chen, Wen-Ya Wu, Fei Liang, Guang-Yu Liu, Ke-Da Yu, Jiong Wu, Gen-Hong Di, Lei Fan, Zhong-Hua Wang, Jun-Jie Li, Zhi-Ming Shao","doi":"10.1002/cac2.12649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/humaal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, the most common breast cancer type, has variable prognosis and high recurrence risk. Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for median-high risk HR+/HER2- patients. This phase II, single-arm, prospective study aimed to explore appropriate neoadjuvant treatment strategies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible female patients with newly diagnosed, untreated HR+/HER2- breast cancer received 2 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (nabPCb). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess tumor responses, and <math><semantics><mo>≥</mo> <annotation>$ \\ge $</annotation></semantics> </math> 40% regression of the maximal tumor diameter was deemed chemo-sensitive. Chemo-sensitive patients continued nabPCb for 4 more cycles (group A). Chemo-insensitive patients were randomized to groups B, C, and D at a ratio of 1:3:1 to receive a new chemotherapy for 4 cycles or endocrine-immune-based therapy (dalpiciclib, letrozole and adebrelimab, with goserelin if patients were premenopausal) for 4 cycles or to undergo surgery. Peripheral blood and core-needle biopsy (CNB) samples were collected before treatment, followed by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel detection and similarity network fusion (SNF) typing through digital pathology data. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoint was the clinical objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 patients were enrolled (67.8% with stage III disease), with 76, 9, 27, and 9 patients in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. The total pCR rate was 4.1%, and all patients who received pCR were in group A. Group C had a better ORR than Group B (81.5% vs. 66.7%). Exploratory analysis revealed that patients with the SNF4 subtype were the most sensitive to nabPCb (pCR rate of 21.1% vs. 1.8% in group A), whereas patients in group C with the SNF2 subtype were more sensitive to endocrine-immune-based therapy (Miller-Payne grade 4-5, 45.5% vs. 6.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Converting to endocrine-immune-based therapy improved the ORR, but not the pCR rate in chemo-insensitive patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are not mutually exclusive. The SNF4 subtype of HR+/HER2- breast cancer was more chemo-sensitive, whereas the SNF2 subtype might be more sensitive to immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/humaal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, the most common breast cancer type, has variable prognosis and high recurrence risk. Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for median-high risk HR+/HER2- patients. This phase II, single-arm, prospective study aimed to explore appropriate neoadjuvant treatment strategies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients.

Methods: Eligible female patients with newly diagnosed, untreated HR+/HER2- breast cancer received 2 cycles of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (nabPCb). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess tumor responses, and $ \ge $ 40% regression of the maximal tumor diameter was deemed chemo-sensitive. Chemo-sensitive patients continued nabPCb for 4 more cycles (group A). Chemo-insensitive patients were randomized to groups B, C, and D at a ratio of 1:3:1 to receive a new chemotherapy for 4 cycles or endocrine-immune-based therapy (dalpiciclib, letrozole and adebrelimab, with goserelin if patients were premenopausal) for 4 cycles or to undergo surgery. Peripheral blood and core-needle biopsy (CNB) samples were collected before treatment, followed by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel detection and similarity network fusion (SNF) typing through digital pathology data. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoint was the clinical objective response rate (ORR).

Results: A total of 121 patients were enrolled (67.8% with stage III disease), with 76, 9, 27, and 9 patients in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. The total pCR rate was 4.1%, and all patients who received pCR were in group A. Group C had a better ORR than Group B (81.5% vs. 66.7%). Exploratory analysis revealed that patients with the SNF4 subtype were the most sensitive to nabPCb (pCR rate of 21.1% vs. 1.8% in group A), whereas patients in group C with the SNF2 subtype were more sensitive to endocrine-immune-based therapy (Miller-Payne grade 4-5, 45.5% vs. 6.3%).

Conclusions: Converting to endocrine-immune-based therapy improved the ORR, but not the pCR rate in chemo-insensitive patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are not mutually exclusive. The SNF4 subtype of HR+/HER2- breast cancer was more chemo-sensitive, whereas the SNF2 subtype might be more sensitive to immunotherapy.

一项基于HR+/HER2-乳腺癌化疗敏感性的前瞻性II期新辅助研究
背景:激素受体阳性(HR+)/人生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)乳腺癌是最常见的乳腺癌类型,预后多变,复发率高。推荐新辅助治疗中高危HR+/HER2-患者。这项II期、单臂、前瞻性研究旨在探索HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者合适的新辅助治疗策略。方法:符合条件的女性新诊断,未经治疗的HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者接受2个周期的nab-紫杉醇和卡铂(nabPCb)治疗。磁共振成像(MRI)评估肿瘤反应,最大肿瘤直径≥40%的回归被认为是化疗敏感。化疗敏感患者继续nabPCb 4个周期(A组)。化疗不敏感患者按1:3:1的比例随机分为B、C和D组,接受新的化疗4个周期或内分泌免疫治疗(达匹昔利布、来曲唑和阿布来单抗,绝经前患者加戈舍林)4个周期或接受手术。治疗前采集外周血和核心针活检(CNB)样本,然后通过数字病理数据进行下一代测序(NGS)面板检测和相似网络融合(SNF)分型。主要终点为病理完全缓解率(pCR),次要终点为临床客观缓解率(ORR)。结果:共纳入121例患者(67.8%为III期疾病),A、B、C、D组分别为76例、9例、27例和9例。总pCR率为4.1%,所有接受pCR的患者均为a组。C组的ORR优于B组(81.5%比66.7%)。探索性分析显示,SNF4亚型患者对nabPCb最敏感(pCR率为21.1%,A组为1.8%),而C组SNF2亚型患者对内分泌免疫治疗更敏感(Miller-Payne分级4-5,45.5%,A组为6.3%)。结论:转向内分泌免疫治疗可改善化疗不敏感患者的ORR,但不能改善pCR率。新辅助化疗和内分泌治疗并不相互排斥。HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的SNF4亚型对化疗更敏感,而SNF2亚型可能对免疫治疗更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Communications
Cancer Communications Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
25.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Communications is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses basic, clinical, and translational cancer research. The journal welcomes submissions concerning clinical trials, epidemiology, molecular and cellular biology, and genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信