Historical redlining and clustering of present-day breast cancer factors.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Jared Aldstadt, Lili Tian, Helen C S Meier, Henry Taylor Louis, Heather M Ochs-Balcom
{"title":"Historical redlining and clustering of present-day breast cancer factors.","authors":"Sarah M Lima, Tia M Palermo, Jared Aldstadt, Lili Tian, Helen C S Meier, Henry Taylor Louis, Heather M Ochs-Balcom","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01950-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Historical redlining, a 1930s-era form of residential segregation and proxy of structural racism, has been associated with breast cancer risk, stage, and survival, but research is lacking on how known present-day breast cancer risk factors are related to historical redlining. We aimed to describe the clustering of present-day neighborhood-level breast cancer risk factors with historical redlining and evaluate geographic patterning across the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This ecologic study included US neighborhoods (census tracts) with Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) grades, defined as having a score in the Historic Redlining Score dataset; 2019 Population Level Analysis and Community EStimates (PLACES) data; and 2014-2016 Environmental Justice Index (EJI) data. Neighborhoods were defined as redlined if score ≥ 2.5. Prevalence quintiles of established adverse and protective breast cancer factors relating to behavior, environment, and socioeconomic status (SES) were used to classify neighborhoods as high-risk or not. Factor analysis grouped factors into domains. Overall and domain-specific scores were calculated for each neighborhood according to historical redlining status. Percent difference in score by historical redlining was used to assess differences in average scores, with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test used to estimate significance. Kappa statistic was used to estimate concordance between historical redlining status and high-risk status. Heatmaps of scores were created to compare spatial clustering of high-risk factors to historical redlining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two domains: (1) behavior + SES; (2) healthcare. Across the US, redlined neighborhoods had significantly more breast cancer factors than non-redlined (redlined neighborhoods = 5.41 average high-risk factors vs. non-redlined = 3.55 average high-risk factors; p < 0.0001). Domain-specific results were similar (percent difference for redlined vs. non-redlined: 39.1% higher for behavior + SES scale; 23.1% higher for healthcare scale). High-scoring neighborhoods tended to spatially overlap with D-grades, with heterogeneity by scale and region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breast cancer risk factors clustered together more in historically redlined neighborhoods compared to non-redlined neighborhoods. Our findings suggest there are regional differences for which breast cancer factors cluster by historical redlining, therefore interventions aimed at redlining-based cancer disparities need to be tailored to the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01950-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Historical redlining, a 1930s-era form of residential segregation and proxy of structural racism, has been associated with breast cancer risk, stage, and survival, but research is lacking on how known present-day breast cancer risk factors are related to historical redlining. We aimed to describe the clustering of present-day neighborhood-level breast cancer risk factors with historical redlining and evaluate geographic patterning across the US.

Methods: This ecologic study included US neighborhoods (census tracts) with Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) grades, defined as having a score in the Historic Redlining Score dataset; 2019 Population Level Analysis and Community EStimates (PLACES) data; and 2014-2016 Environmental Justice Index (EJI) data. Neighborhoods were defined as redlined if score ≥ 2.5. Prevalence quintiles of established adverse and protective breast cancer factors relating to behavior, environment, and socioeconomic status (SES) were used to classify neighborhoods as high-risk or not. Factor analysis grouped factors into domains. Overall and domain-specific scores were calculated for each neighborhood according to historical redlining status. Percent difference in score by historical redlining was used to assess differences in average scores, with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test used to estimate significance. Kappa statistic was used to estimate concordance between historical redlining status and high-risk status. Heatmaps of scores were created to compare spatial clustering of high-risk factors to historical redlining.

Results: We identified two domains: (1) behavior + SES; (2) healthcare. Across the US, redlined neighborhoods had significantly more breast cancer factors than non-redlined (redlined neighborhoods = 5.41 average high-risk factors vs. non-redlined = 3.55 average high-risk factors; p < 0.0001). Domain-specific results were similar (percent difference for redlined vs. non-redlined: 39.1% higher for behavior + SES scale; 23.1% higher for healthcare scale). High-scoring neighborhoods tended to spatially overlap with D-grades, with heterogeneity by scale and region.

Conclusion: Breast cancer risk factors clustered together more in historically redlined neighborhoods compared to non-redlined neighborhoods. Our findings suggest there are regional differences for which breast cancer factors cluster by historical redlining, therefore interventions aimed at redlining-based cancer disparities need to be tailored to the community.

当代乳腺癌因素的历史红线和聚类。
目的:历史红线是20世纪30年代的一种居住隔离形式,是结构性种族主义的代表,它与乳腺癌的风险、分期和生存有关,但缺乏关于当今乳腺癌风险因素与历史红线之间关系的研究。我们的目的是用历史红线描述当今社区乳腺癌风险因素的聚集性,并评估美国各地的地理模式。方法:本生态研究包括美国社区(人口普查区),房屋所有者贷款公司(HOLC)等级,定义为在历史红线得分数据集中得分;2019年人口水平分析和社区估计(PLACES)数据;2014-2016年环境正义指数(EJI)数据。如果评分≥2.5,则将社区定义为红线。使用与行为、环境和社会经济地位(SES)相关的已确定的不良和保护性乳腺癌因素的患病率五分位数来将社区划分为高风险或非高风险。因子分析将因子分组到不同的领域。根据历史标记状态计算每个邻域的总体分数和特定领域分数。采用历史红线得分差异百分比评估平均得分差异,采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验评估显著性。采用Kappa统计估计历史红线状态与高危状态之间的一致性。创建得分的热图,将高危因素的空间聚类与历史红线进行比较。结果:我们确定了两个领域:(1)行为+ SES;(2)医疗保健。在全美范围内,红线社区的乳腺癌因素明显高于非红线社区(红线社区= 5.41个平均高危因素vs.非红线社区= 3.55个平均高危因素;p结论:与非红线社区相比,历史红线社区的乳腺癌危险因素更多地聚集在一起。我们的研究结果表明,乳腺癌因素通过历史红线聚集在一起存在地区差异,因此针对基于红线的癌症差异的干预措施需要针对社区进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信