Reconceptualizing Disorders of the Self as Disorders of Relationship.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Brick Johnstone, Daniel Cohen, Raeda Anderson, Andrew Cullen Dennison, Laura Bosque
{"title":"Reconceptualizing Disorders of the Self as Disorders of Relationship.","authors":"Brick Johnstone, Daniel Cohen, Raeda Anderson, Andrew Cullen Dennison, Laura Bosque","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a universal neuropsychological model that suggests that disorders of the self are best conceptualized as disintegrated neuropsychological processes (ie, sensations, mental experiences) that lack a sense of relationship to the unified experience/sense of self.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation hospital outpatient clinics.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 73 individuals including 33 with acquired brain injury and 40 with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>On the basis of the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, a measure of general disintegration of sensations and mental experiences, a team of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers proposed 6 clinically derived indices of specific disintegrated neuropsychological inputs (ie, sensations), outputs (ie, mental experiences), and experiences of disintegration (ie, space, time, context).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As hypothesized (1) a confirmatory factor analysis supported the proposed factors including disintegrated bodily sensations (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]=0.193, P=.009; comparative fit index [CFI]=0.909; Tucker-Lewis index [TLI]=0.819), disintegrated context (RMSEA=0.143, P=.129; CFI=0.970; TLI=0.911), disintegrated emotions (RMSEA=0.090, P=.266; CFI=0.967; TLI=0.902), disintegrated cognition (RMSEA=0.091, P=.210; CFI=0.963; TLI=0.939), disintegrated smell/taste, and disintegrated spatial perception (measures of model fit for these last 2 factors could not be determined given they included only 2 items); and (2) Pearson correlations indicated that all 7 Cambridge Depersonalization Scale indices were negatively correlated with a measure associated with right hemisphere functioning, with 5 achieving/approaching statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that (1) neuropsychological abilities should be conceptualized in terms of relatively singular neuropsychological domains (ie, affect, behavior, cognition, sensation) and the experience of relationship that is created when they are integrated, and (2) disorders of the self are best conceptualized as disorders of disintegration that are associated with decreased relationship between specific neuropsychological processes and the unified experience/sense of self.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To validate a universal neuropsychological model that suggests that disorders of the self are best conceptualized as disintegrated neuropsychological processes (ie, sensations, mental experiences) that lack a sense of relationship to the unified experience/sense of self.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Rehabilitation hospital outpatient clinics.

Participants: A total of 73 individuals including 33 with acquired brain injury and 40 with multiple sclerosis.

Intervention: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: On the basis of the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, a measure of general disintegration of sensations and mental experiences, a team of rehabilitation clinicians and researchers proposed 6 clinically derived indices of specific disintegrated neuropsychological inputs (ie, sensations), outputs (ie, mental experiences), and experiences of disintegration (ie, space, time, context).

Results: As hypothesized (1) a confirmatory factor analysis supported the proposed factors including disintegrated bodily sensations (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]=0.193, P=.009; comparative fit index [CFI]=0.909; Tucker-Lewis index [TLI]=0.819), disintegrated context (RMSEA=0.143, P=.129; CFI=0.970; TLI=0.911), disintegrated emotions (RMSEA=0.090, P=.266; CFI=0.967; TLI=0.902), disintegrated cognition (RMSEA=0.091, P=.210; CFI=0.963; TLI=0.939), disintegrated smell/taste, and disintegrated spatial perception (measures of model fit for these last 2 factors could not be determined given they included only 2 items); and (2) Pearson correlations indicated that all 7 Cambridge Depersonalization Scale indices were negatively correlated with a measure associated with right hemisphere functioning, with 5 achieving/approaching statistical significance.

Conclusion: The results suggest that (1) neuropsychological abilities should be conceptualized in terms of relatively singular neuropsychological domains (ie, affect, behavior, cognition, sensation) and the experience of relationship that is created when they are integrated, and (2) disorders of the self are best conceptualized as disorders of disintegration that are associated with decreased relationship between specific neuropsychological processes and the unified experience/sense of self.

将自我障碍重新定义为关系障碍。
目的:验证一个普遍的神经心理学模型,该模型表明自我障碍最好被概念化为与统一的经验/自我感缺乏关系的解体的神经心理学过程(即感觉,心理体验)。设计:横断面观察性研究。地点:康复医院门诊。参与者:73人,包括33名获得性脑损伤患者和40名多发性硬化症患者。干预:不适用。主要结果测量:基于剑桥去人格化量表(Cambridge Depersonalization Scale40),一个康复临床医生和研究人员团队提出了六个临床衍生的指标,分别是特定的解体神经心理输入(即感觉)、输出(即心理体验)和解体体验(即空间、时间、环境)。结果:如假设:1)验证性因子分析支持所提出的因素包括身体感觉解体(RMSEA=0.193, p=0.009;CFI = 0.909;TLI=0.819)、解体环境(RMSEA=0.143, p=0.129;CFI = 0.970;TLI=0.911)、情绪分解(RMSEA=0.090, p=0.266;CFI = 0.967;TLI=0.902)、解体认知(RMSEA=0.091, p=0.210;CFI = 0.963;TLI=0.939),分解的嗅觉/味觉和分解的空间感知(最后两个因素的模型拟合度量无法确定,因为它们只包括2个项目);2) Pearson相关性表明,7个CDS指标均与右半球功能相关指标呈负相关,其中5个指标达到或接近统计学显著性。结论:研究结果表明:1)神经心理能力应被定义为相对单一的神经心理领域(即情感、行为、认知、感觉)和当它们整合时所产生的关系体验;2)自我障碍最好被定义为与特定神经心理过程与统一的自我体验/感觉之间的关系减弱相关的解体障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信