Investigation and modeling of land use effects on water quality in two NYC water supply streams.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123993
Rajith Mukundan, Mahrokh Moknatian, Rakesh K Gelda
{"title":"Investigation and modeling of land use effects on water quality in two NYC water supply streams.","authors":"Rajith Mukundan, Mahrokh Moknatian, Rakesh K Gelda","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paired watershed monitoring approach is widely used to investigate hydrologic processes and water quality, providing streamflow and water quality records for long-term trend analysis, as well as data for developing and testing hydrologic models. In this study we use 20 years of streamflow and water quality data, along with a watershed model, to examine sources of stream nutrients and their changes over time in two small streams within the New York City water supply system. We compare sources and trends in stream nitrate and dissolved phosphorus in the urbanized Amawalk watershed with those of the predominantly forested Boyd Corners watershed in the Croton system of reservoirs. Stream monitoring data reveal a decreasing trend in nitrate in both watersheds, whereas dissolved phosphorus shows a decreasing trend only in the Amawalk watershed. The decline in nitrate corresponds to decreases in atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in the region, whereas the decrease in dissolved phosphorus in the urban watershed is attributed to upgrades to wastewater treatment plants and regulations on the use of phosphorus-containing lawn fertilizers. Simulations using calibrated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) watershed model indicate that urban land use and wastewater sources dominate nutrient loads in the Amawalk watershed, contributing 55-80% and 9-27% of the annual loads, respectively, while forested areas contribute as much as 80% of nutrients in the Boyd Corners watershed. Furthermore, we find that more than 80% of the input nitrogen from atmospheric deposition and fertilizer sources is retained in these watersheds. This study demonstrates the value of combining long-term monitoring data with watershed models to generate valuable information that could support future watershed management efforts under changing environmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"123993"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paired watershed monitoring approach is widely used to investigate hydrologic processes and water quality, providing streamflow and water quality records for long-term trend analysis, as well as data for developing and testing hydrologic models. In this study we use 20 years of streamflow and water quality data, along with a watershed model, to examine sources of stream nutrients and their changes over time in two small streams within the New York City water supply system. We compare sources and trends in stream nitrate and dissolved phosphorus in the urbanized Amawalk watershed with those of the predominantly forested Boyd Corners watershed in the Croton system of reservoirs. Stream monitoring data reveal a decreasing trend in nitrate in both watersheds, whereas dissolved phosphorus shows a decreasing trend only in the Amawalk watershed. The decline in nitrate corresponds to decreases in atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in the region, whereas the decrease in dissolved phosphorus in the urban watershed is attributed to upgrades to wastewater treatment plants and regulations on the use of phosphorus-containing lawn fertilizers. Simulations using calibrated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) watershed model indicate that urban land use and wastewater sources dominate nutrient loads in the Amawalk watershed, contributing 55-80% and 9-27% of the annual loads, respectively, while forested areas contribute as much as 80% of nutrients in the Boyd Corners watershed. Furthermore, we find that more than 80% of the input nitrogen from atmospheric deposition and fertilizer sources is retained in these watersheds. This study demonstrates the value of combining long-term monitoring data with watershed models to generate valuable information that could support future watershed management efforts under changing environmental conditions.

纽约市两条供水河流土地利用对水质影响的调查与模拟。
配对流域监测方法被广泛用于水文过程和水质调查,为长期趋势分析提供流量和水质记录,并为开发和测试水文模型提供数据。在这项研究中,我们使用了20年的河流流量和水质数据,以及流域模型,来检查纽约市供水系统内两条小溪的河流营养物质来源及其随时间的变化。我们比较了城市化的Amawalk流域与Croton水库系统中以森林为主的Boyd Corners流域的溪流硝酸盐和溶解磷的来源和趋势。河流监测数据显示,两个流域的硝酸盐呈下降趋势,而溶解磷仅在Amawalk流域呈下降趋势。硝酸盐的下降与该地区大气氮沉降的减少相对应,而城市流域溶解磷的减少归因于污水处理厂的升级和对含磷草坪肥料使用的规定。利用校准的水土评估工具(SWAT)流域模型进行的模拟表明,城市土地利用和废水来源主导了Amawalk流域的养分负荷,分别贡献了55-80%和9-27%的年负荷,而在Boyd Corners流域,森林地区贡献了高达80%的养分。此外,我们发现来自大气沉降和肥料来源的输入氮的80%以上被保留在这些流域。这项研究证明了将长期监测数据与流域模型相结合的价值,以产生有价值的信息,这些信息可以支持未来在不断变化的环境条件下的流域管理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信