Self-Learning Videos in Focused Transthoracic Echocardiography Training

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1111/tct.70014
Diana Morales Castro, Irene Wong, Danny Panisko, Umberin Najeeb, Ghislaine Douflé
{"title":"Self-Learning Videos in Focused Transthoracic Echocardiography Training","authors":"Diana Morales Castro,&nbsp;Irene Wong,&nbsp;Danny Panisko,&nbsp;Umberin Najeeb,&nbsp;Ghislaine Douflé","doi":"10.1111/tct.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Focused transthoracic echocardiography (FOTE) is crucial for patients' bedside management. However, limited opportunities exist for practical FOTE training, prompting the use of simulation and self-learning videos to overcome this constraint. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of incorporating self-learning videos into a simulation FOTE training course.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective, randomized study involving University of Toronto internal medicine residents, who participated in a 2-h didactic and simulation FOTE training course before being randomized to a control group receiving written learning materials or an intervention group with additional self-directed learning videos.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight participants were randomized, and twenty-one (75%) completed the 1-month follow-up. Participants were assessed using a written test on image acquisition techniques and structure identification, scanning time and image quality on a simulator and self-reported scanning comfort, both pre-intervention and 1-month post-intervention. The groups had no significant difference in the time spent reviewing the material (1.5 vs. 1.4 h, <i>p</i> = 0.76). A significant increase in post-course scores was observed in all evaluations except for the control group's written test (<i>p</i> = 0.07). There were no significant between-group differences across the written test (<i>p</i> = 0.7), image quality (<i>p</i> = 0.6) and comfort level (<i>p</i> = 0.7). Compared to the control group, the intervention group exhibited a greater reduction in the scanning time (38 vs. 72 s, <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>FOTE training effectively increases theoretical knowledge and practical skills in a simulated setting. However, limited video utilization by participants precluded the inference of definitive conclusions on the impact of self-learning videos.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Focused transthoracic echocardiography (FOTE) is crucial for patients' bedside management. However, limited opportunities exist for practical FOTE training, prompting the use of simulation and self-learning videos to overcome this constraint. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of incorporating self-learning videos into a simulation FOTE training course.

Approach

This was a prospective, randomized study involving University of Toronto internal medicine residents, who participated in a 2-h didactic and simulation FOTE training course before being randomized to a control group receiving written learning materials or an intervention group with additional self-directed learning videos.

Evaluation

Twenty-eight participants were randomized, and twenty-one (75%) completed the 1-month follow-up. Participants were assessed using a written test on image acquisition techniques and structure identification, scanning time and image quality on a simulator and self-reported scanning comfort, both pre-intervention and 1-month post-intervention. The groups had no significant difference in the time spent reviewing the material (1.5 vs. 1.4 h, p = 0.76). A significant increase in post-course scores was observed in all evaluations except for the control group's written test (p = 0.07). There were no significant between-group differences across the written test (p = 0.7), image quality (p = 0.6) and comfort level (p = 0.7). Compared to the control group, the intervention group exhibited a greater reduction in the scanning time (38 vs. 72 s, p = 0.02).

Implications

FOTE training effectively increases theoretical knowledge and practical skills in a simulated setting. However, limited video utilization by participants precluded the inference of definitive conclusions on the impact of self-learning videos.

Abstract Image

重点经胸超声心动图训练中的自学录像。
背景:聚焦经胸超声心动图(FOTE)对患者床边管理至关重要。然而,实际的FOTE培训机会有限,促使使用模拟和自学视频来克服这一限制。本研究旨在评估将自学视频纳入模拟FOTE培训课程的影响。方法:这是一项前瞻性随机研究,涉及多伦多大学内科住院医师,他们参加了2小时的教学和模拟FOTE培训课程,然后被随机分配到接受书面学习材料的对照组或接受额外自主学习视频的干预组。评价:28名参与者被随机分组,其中21名(75%)完成了1个月的随访。在干预前和干预后1个月,对参与者进行了图像采集技术和结构识别、扫描时间和模拟器上的图像质量以及自我报告的扫描舒适度的笔试评估。两组回顾材料的时间无显著差异(1.5 h vs. 1.4 h, p = 0.76)。除对照组的笔试外,所有评估的课程后分数均有显著增加(p = 0.07)。笔试(p = 0.7)、图像质量(p = 0.6)和舒适度(p = 0.7)组间无显著差异。与对照组相比,干预组扫描时间明显缩短(38 vs 72 s, p = 0.02)。启示:在模拟环境中,FOTE训练有效地增加了理论知识和实践技能。然而,有限的视频使用的参与者排除了对自主学习视频的影响的明确结论的推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信