The efficiency of biofeedback electric stimulation therapy combined with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in treating erectile dysfunction: a clinical study.

Revista internacional de andrologia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.22514/j.androl.2024.026
Luo Yang, Suliya Yushanjiang, Sixiao Zhang, Yue Zhao, Yi Luo, Guo Chen, Yi Dai, Rui Qu
{"title":"The efficiency of biofeedback electric stimulation therapy combined with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in treating erectile dysfunction: a clinical study.","authors":"Luo Yang, Suliya Yushanjiang, Sixiao Zhang, Yue Zhao, Yi Luo, Guo Chen, Yi Dai, Rui Qu","doi":"10.22514/j.androl.2024.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the quality of life of both patients and their partners. Current therapeutic approaches often struggle to address the diverse needs of all patients. In addition, the efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in improving ED symptoms has been insufficiently investigated. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LIPUS and to assess whether combining LIPUS with biofeedback electric stimulation for pelvic floor therapy enhances treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively retrieved and assessed the data of 68 patients treated at West China Fourth Hospital. Of them, 30 patients received LIPUS therapy alone, while 38 underwent combined therapy of LIPUS and biofeedback electric stimulation. Both groups completed eight treatment sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the treatment, the efficacy of the treatments was measured using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), Erectile Hardness Score (EHS), and Erection Satisfaction Score (ESS) after 4 and 8 treatments. Significant improvements were observed in the LIPUS-only group in IIEF-5, EHS and ESS scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for all measures). The positive response rate was 79.41% after eight treatments. Improvements in IIEF-5 scores were observed in both groups (LIPUS: 11.50 to 16.60; combined therapy: 10.61 to 16.90; <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as in EHS scores (LIPUS: 2.27 to 3.07; combined therapy: 2.26 to 3.11; <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the LIPUS-only and combined therapy groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LIPUS therapy demonstrates potential for alleviating ED symptoms, and the addition of biofeedback electric stimulation for pelvic floor therapy did not result in significantly superior outcomes compared to LIPUS alone. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations is necessary to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":519907,"journal":{"name":"Revista internacional de andrologia","volume":"22 4","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista internacional de andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/j.androl.2024.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the quality of life of both patients and their partners. Current therapeutic approaches often struggle to address the diverse needs of all patients. In addition, the efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in improving ED symptoms has been insufficiently investigated. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LIPUS and to assess whether combining LIPUS with biofeedback electric stimulation for pelvic floor therapy enhances treatment outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively retrieved and assessed the data of 68 patients treated at West China Fourth Hospital. Of them, 30 patients received LIPUS therapy alone, while 38 underwent combined therapy of LIPUS and biofeedback electric stimulation. Both groups completed eight treatment sessions.

Results: After the treatment, the efficacy of the treatments was measured using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), Erectile Hardness Score (EHS), and Erection Satisfaction Score (ESS) after 4 and 8 treatments. Significant improvements were observed in the LIPUS-only group in IIEF-5, EHS and ESS scores (p < 0.001 for all measures). The positive response rate was 79.41% after eight treatments. Improvements in IIEF-5 scores were observed in both groups (LIPUS: 11.50 to 16.60; combined therapy: 10.61 to 16.90; p < 0.001), as well as in EHS scores (LIPUS: 2.27 to 3.07; combined therapy: 2.26 to 3.11; p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the LIPUS-only and combined therapy groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: LIPUS therapy demonstrates potential for alleviating ED symptoms, and the addition of biofeedback electric stimulation for pelvic floor therapy did not result in significantly superior outcomes compared to LIPUS alone. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations is necessary to confirm these results.

生物反馈电刺激联合低强度脉冲超声治疗勃起功能障碍的临床研究。
背景:勃起功能障碍(ED)是一种普遍的疾病,显著影响患者及其伴侣的生活质量。目前的治疗方法往往难以满足所有患者的不同需求。此外,低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)在改善ED症状方面的疗效尚未得到充分的研究。因此,本研究旨在评估LIPUS的有效性,并评估LIPUS与生物反馈电刺激联合用于盆底治疗是否能提高治疗效果。方法:对华西第四医院收治的68例患者资料进行回顾性分析。其中,30例患者单独接受LIPUS治疗,38例患者接受LIPUS与生物反馈电刺激联合治疗。两组都完成了8个疗程的治疗。结果:治疗后,采用国际勃起功能指数-5 (IIEF-5)、勃起硬度评分(EHS)、治疗4、8次后勃起满意度评分(ESS)对治疗效果进行评价。仅使用lipus组在IIEF-5、EHS和ESS评分方面均有显著改善(所有测量值p < 0.001)。8次治疗后阳性有效率为79.41%。两组患者IIEF-5评分均有改善(LIPUS: 11.50 ~ 16.60;联合治疗:10.61 ~ 16.90;p < 0.001),以及EHS评分(LIPUS: 2.27 ~ 3.07;联合治疗:2.26 ~ 3.11;P < 0.001)。然而,单药组与联合治疗组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:LIPUS治疗显示出缓解ED症状的潜力,与单独使用LIPUS相比,在盆底治疗中加入生物反馈电刺激并没有显著的好结果。进一步的研究需要更大的样本量和更长的治疗时间来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信