Women with breast implants have higher adjusted abnormal cardiac testing and coronary angiography but lower coronary intervention.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad Reza Movahed, Kyvan Irannejad, Emma Venard, Luke Keating, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh
{"title":"Women with breast implants have higher adjusted abnormal cardiac testing and coronary angiography but lower coronary intervention.","authors":"Mohammad Reza Movahed, Kyvan Irannejad, Emma Venard, Luke Keating, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.12.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast implants interfere with myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) and echocardiographic windows leading to increased false positive results. To validate this concept, we hypothesized that patients with breast implants should have higher positive cardiac testing and coronary angiogram with lower percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates compared to women without a breast implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using ICD 10 codes for breast implants, abnormal results of cardiac functional study, coronary angiogram, and percutaneous coronary interventions, we evaluated any association between these parameters in adult women with breast implants utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45,015 women had abnormal cardiac functional studies. A total of 1,871,335 women 18 or older underwent coronary angiography. From those, 865,020 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Women with breast implants with abnormal cardiac functional tests were 10 years younger (55.06 vs 65.06 years, p<0.001). Furthermore, the breast implant cohort had a higher adjusted abnormal cardiac functional study (OR1.78, CI 1.11-2.26, p=0.02). Adult women with breast implants also had a significantly higher rate of adjusted coronary angiography (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.17-1.44, P<0.001) but a lower rate of PCI (35.7% vs 46.2%, P<0.001, unadjusted OR: 0.65, CI 0.54-0.78, adjusted OR 0.79, CI 0.65-0.98, P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with breast implants had higher adjusted positive cardiac functional studies, and a higher adjusted rate of coronary angiography but lower rates of PCI consistent with our hypothesis that breast implant interference can increase abnormal cardiac testing leading to an increase in the utilization of coronary angiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.12.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast implants interfere with myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) and echocardiographic windows leading to increased false positive results. To validate this concept, we hypothesized that patients with breast implants should have higher positive cardiac testing and coronary angiogram with lower percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates compared to women without a breast implant.

Methods: Using ICD 10 codes for breast implants, abnormal results of cardiac functional study, coronary angiogram, and percutaneous coronary interventions, we evaluated any association between these parameters in adult women with breast implants utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

Results: A total of 45,015 women had abnormal cardiac functional studies. A total of 1,871,335 women 18 or older underwent coronary angiography. From those, 865,020 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Women with breast implants with abnormal cardiac functional tests were 10 years younger (55.06 vs 65.06 years, p<0.001). Furthermore, the breast implant cohort had a higher adjusted abnormal cardiac functional study (OR1.78, CI 1.11-2.26, p=0.02). Adult women with breast implants also had a significantly higher rate of adjusted coronary angiography (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.17-1.44, P<0.001) but a lower rate of PCI (35.7% vs 46.2%, P<0.001, unadjusted OR: 0.65, CI 0.54-0.78, adjusted OR 0.79, CI 0.65-0.98, P=0.01).

Conclusions: Women with breast implants had higher adjusted positive cardiac functional studies, and a higher adjusted rate of coronary angiography but lower rates of PCI consistent with our hypothesis that breast implant interference can increase abnormal cardiac testing leading to an increase in the utilization of coronary angiography.

植入乳房的妇女有较高的调整异常心脏检查和冠状动脉造影,但较低的冠状动脉介入治疗。
背景:乳房植入物干扰心肌灌注成像(SPECT)和超声心动图窗口导致假阳性结果增加。为了验证这一概念,我们假设与未植入乳房的女性相比,植入乳房的患者应该有更高的心脏检查和冠状动脉造影阳性,而经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的发生率更低。方法:使用ICD 10乳房植入物编码、心功能研究异常结果、冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入检查,我们利用国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库评估了这些参数在使用乳房植入物的成年女性中的关联。结果:共有45,015名女性心功能异常。共有1871335名18岁及以上的女性接受了冠状动脉造影。其中,865,020人接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。结论:植入乳房的女性有较高的心功能校正阳性,冠状动脉造影校正率较高,但PCI校正率较低,这与我们的假设一致,即乳房植入物干扰可增加心脏异常检查,导致冠状动脉造影使用率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信