Comparison of CT-like MRI sequences for preoperative planning of cochlear implantation using super-high-resolution CT as a reference.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ulysse Puel, Achille Beysang, Gabriella Hossu, Michael Eliezer, Bouchra Assabah, Khalid Ambarki, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Alain Blum, Cécile Parietti-Winkler, Romain Gillet
{"title":"Comparison of CT-like MRI sequences for preoperative planning of cochlear implantation using super-high-resolution CT as a reference.","authors":"Ulysse Puel, Achille Beysang, Gabriella Hossu, Michael Eliezer, Bouchra Assabah, Khalid Ambarki, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Alain Blum, Cécile Parietti-Winkler, Romain Gillet","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00538-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) computed tomography (CT)-like sequences compared to normal-resolution CT (NR-CT) and super-high-resolution CT (SHR-CT) for planning of cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six cadaveric temporal bone specimens were used. 3-T MRI scans were performed using radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold (STARVIBE), pointwise-encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and ultrashort time of echo (UTE) sequences. CT scans were performed on two scanners for SHR-CT and NR-CT acquisitions. Two radiologists evaluated accuracy based on preimplantation metrics and the ability to identify various anatomical structures, particularly the facial recess and round window. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The facial nerve was always clearly visible (score ≥ 2) in the MRI, NR-CT, and SHR-CT scans (p ≥ 0.621). However, the chorda tympani nerve (CTN) was clearly visualized in UTE, STARVIBE, and PETRA sequences in only 33% (2/6 specimens, p = 0.016), 50% (3/6 specimens, p = 0.038), and 83% (5/6 specimens, p = 0.017) of cases, respectively, whereas it was always clearly visualized in SHR and NR-CT (p = 0.426). The round window (RW) was never visualized in MRI sequences (p ≤ 0.010), whereas it was identified in all cases in SHR and NR-CT (p = 1.000). There was a strong correlation between measurements obtained from MRI and CT modalities (ICC ≥ 0.837).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI CT-like sequences assessed the facial nerve in all cases and the CTN in up to 87% of cases. However, the detection of the RW was insufficient for surgical planning. CT and MRI measurements were in agreement.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>CT-like MRI sequences can image the anatomy of the facial recess and the length of the basal turn of the cochlea with similar accuracy as conventional CT, although they cannot image the round window.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>CT-like MRI sequences are not widely used in preoperative cochlear implantation imaging. CT-like sequences can image the facial recess as well as conventional CT. CT-like sequences can image the basal turn length of the cochlea as well as conventional CT. Round window depiction is not possible with CT-like MRI sequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00538-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) computed tomography (CT)-like sequences compared to normal-resolution CT (NR-CT) and super-high-resolution CT (SHR-CT) for planning of cochlear implantation.

Methods: Six cadaveric temporal bone specimens were used. 3-T MRI scans were performed using radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold (STARVIBE), pointwise-encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and ultrashort time of echo (UTE) sequences. CT scans were performed on two scanners for SHR-CT and NR-CT acquisitions. Two radiologists evaluated accuracy based on preimplantation metrics and the ability to identify various anatomical structures, particularly the facial recess and round window. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.

Results: The facial nerve was always clearly visible (score ≥ 2) in the MRI, NR-CT, and SHR-CT scans (p ≥ 0.621). However, the chorda tympani nerve (CTN) was clearly visualized in UTE, STARVIBE, and PETRA sequences in only 33% (2/6 specimens, p = 0.016), 50% (3/6 specimens, p = 0.038), and 83% (5/6 specimens, p = 0.017) of cases, respectively, whereas it was always clearly visualized in SHR and NR-CT (p = 0.426). The round window (RW) was never visualized in MRI sequences (p ≤ 0.010), whereas it was identified in all cases in SHR and NR-CT (p = 1.000). There was a strong correlation between measurements obtained from MRI and CT modalities (ICC ≥ 0.837).

Conclusion: MRI CT-like sequences assessed the facial nerve in all cases and the CTN in up to 87% of cases. However, the detection of the RW was insufficient for surgical planning. CT and MRI measurements were in agreement.

Relevance statement: CT-like MRI sequences can image the anatomy of the facial recess and the length of the basal turn of the cochlea with similar accuracy as conventional CT, although they cannot image the round window.

Key points: CT-like MRI sequences are not widely used in preoperative cochlear implantation imaging. CT-like sequences can image the facial recess as well as conventional CT. CT-like sequences can image the basal turn length of the cochlea as well as conventional CT. Round window depiction is not possible with CT-like MRI sequences.

超分辨率CT对人工耳蜗植入术前规划的CT样MRI序列比较
背景:我们评估了磁共振成像(MRI)计算机断层扫描(CT)样序列与正常分辨率CT (NR-CT)和超高分辨率CT (shrr -CT)在人工耳蜗植入计划中的准确性。方法:采用6具尸体颞骨标本。3-T MRI扫描采用径向容积内插式屏气(STARVIBE)、径向采集点向编码时间缩短(PETRA)和超短回波时间(UTE)序列进行。CT扫描在两台扫描仪上进行shrr -CT和NR-CT采集。两名放射科医生根据植入前的指标和识别各种解剖结构的能力来评估准确性,特别是面部隐窝和圆窗。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和类内相关系数(ICC)。结果:面神经在MRI、NR-CT、shrc - ct扫描中均清晰可见(评分≥2分)(p≥0.621)。然而,只有33%(2/6例,p = 0.016)、50%(3/6例,p = 0.038)和83%(5/6例,p = 0.017)的病例在UTE、STARVIBE和PETRA序列中清晰可见鼓室索神经(CTN),而在SHR和NR-CT中始终清晰可见(p = 0.426)。在MRI序列中未见圆窗(p≤0.010),而在SHR和NR-CT中发现了所有病例(p = 1.000)。MRI和CT测量结果有很强的相关性(ICC≥0.837)。结论:MRI ct样序列评估了所有病例的面神经和高达87%的病例的CTN。然而,对RW的检测不足以制定手术计划。CT和MRI测量结果一致。相关性声明:CT样MRI序列可以成像面隐窝的解剖结构和耳蜗基底转的长度,其准确性与传统CT相似,但不能成像圆窗。重点:ct样MRI序列在人工耳蜗植入术前成像中应用并不广泛。CT样序列可以像常规CT一样成像面部隐窝。CT样序列可以像常规CT一样显示耳蜗基底旋转长度。ct样MRI序列不可能有圆窗描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信