When should the tricuspid valve be repaired during mitral valve repair?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001193
Kevin R An, Ekene Nwajei, Michael W A Chu
{"title":"When should the tricuspid valve be repaired during mitral valve repair?","authors":"Kevin R An, Ekene Nwajei, Michael W A Chu","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Management of tricuspid regurgitation and annular dilation during mitral valve repair remains controversial. We review the latest evidence on indications to repair the tricuspid valve during mitral valve repair and discuss surgical strategies and complications.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Concomitant tricuspid valve repair of moderate tricuspid regurgitation is effective in reducing tricuspid regurgitation progression at 2 years, but has not shown benefit to late survival, quality of life, or functional benefit, and is associated with increased permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) rates, which is associated with reduced late survival. Progression of less than moderate tricuspid regurgitation with annular dilation alone is uncommon, obviating the need for concomitant repair.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Repairing concomitant moderate tricuspid regurgitation at the time of mitral repair reduces tricuspid regurgitation progression at 2 years, at the cost of a higher PPM implantation rate. However, repairing less than moderate tricuspid regurgitation for annular dilation alone has not been shown to reduce tricuspid regurgitation progression, bringing current guideline recommendations surrounding repair for annular dilation into question. Longer-term follow-up data, at 5 years, will shed further light on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Management of tricuspid regurgitation and annular dilation during mitral valve repair remains controversial. We review the latest evidence on indications to repair the tricuspid valve during mitral valve repair and discuss surgical strategies and complications.

Recent findings: Concomitant tricuspid valve repair of moderate tricuspid regurgitation is effective in reducing tricuspid regurgitation progression at 2 years, but has not shown benefit to late survival, quality of life, or functional benefit, and is associated with increased permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) rates, which is associated with reduced late survival. Progression of less than moderate tricuspid regurgitation with annular dilation alone is uncommon, obviating the need for concomitant repair.

Summary: Repairing concomitant moderate tricuspid regurgitation at the time of mitral repair reduces tricuspid regurgitation progression at 2 years, at the cost of a higher PPM implantation rate. However, repairing less than moderate tricuspid regurgitation for annular dilation alone has not been shown to reduce tricuspid regurgitation progression, bringing current guideline recommendations surrounding repair for annular dilation into question. Longer-term follow-up data, at 5 years, will shed further light on this topic.

在二尖瓣修复术中,何时修复三尖瓣?
回顾目的:二尖瓣修复过程中三尖瓣反流和环扩张的处理仍然存在争议。我们回顾了在二尖瓣修复中修复三尖瓣的适应症的最新证据,并讨论了手术策略和并发症。最近的研究发现:中度三尖瓣返流的合并三尖瓣修复在2年时可以有效地减少三尖瓣返流的进展,但对晚期生存、生活质量或功能益处没有显示出益处,并且与永久起搏器植入(PPM)率增加有关,这与晚期生存降低有关。发展到中度以下的三尖瓣反流合并单纯的环扩张是不常见的,因此不需要同时进行修复。摘要:在二尖瓣修复时修复伴随的中度三尖瓣反流可减少2年后三尖瓣反流的进展,但代价是更高的PPM植入率。然而,单纯修复小于中度的三尖瓣反流以治疗环扩张并不能减少三尖瓣反流的进展,这使得目前关于环扩张修复的指南建议受到质疑。5年的长期随访数据将进一步阐明这一主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信