Safety and clinical efficacy of modified tracer fixation technique in orthopedic robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for Kümmell's disease.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Xuebin Tang, Chengqiang Zhou, Hua Li, Yifeng Liao, Liang Qiao, Junwei Zhang, Yunqing Wang, Lin Xie
{"title":"Safety and clinical efficacy of modified tracer fixation technique in orthopedic robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for Kümmell's disease.","authors":"Xuebin Tang, Chengqiang Zhou, Hua Li, Yifeng Liao, Liang Qiao, Junwei Zhang, Yunqing Wang, Lin Xie","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02169-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising incidence of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) has increased the demand for precise treatments like robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), especially for conditions like Kümmell's disease that require high surgical accuracy. However, the traditional tracer fixation method has certain limitations. This study aimed to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of a modified tracer fixation technique with the traditional fixation method in robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for Kümmell's disease. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 patients treated between April 2023 and January 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the tracer fixation method: the modified group (skin-fixed, 47 cases) and the traditional group (spinous process-fixed, 41 cases). Outcomes were measured by VAS, ODI, Cobb angle, working channel establishment time, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy dose, and complication rates. Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS, ODI, and Cobb angle at postoperative days 2 and 6 months (P < 0.05). The modified group had significantly lower VAS and ODI scores on postoperative days 2, shorter working channel establishment and surgical duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in intraoperative fluoroscopy dose or complication rates (P > 0.05). In conclusion, while both techniques are safe and effective, the modified skin-fixed tracer technique offers advantages in reducing surgical trauma, significantly shortening the surgical duration, decreasing intraoperative blood loss, and promoting early recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02169-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising incidence of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) has increased the demand for precise treatments like robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), especially for conditions like Kümmell's disease that require high surgical accuracy. However, the traditional tracer fixation method has certain limitations. This study aimed to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of a modified tracer fixation technique with the traditional fixation method in robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for Kümmell's disease. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 patients treated between April 2023 and January 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the tracer fixation method: the modified group (skin-fixed, 47 cases) and the traditional group (spinous process-fixed, 41 cases). Outcomes were measured by VAS, ODI, Cobb angle, working channel establishment time, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy dose, and complication rates. Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS, ODI, and Cobb angle at postoperative days 2 and 6 months (P < 0.05). The modified group had significantly lower VAS and ODI scores on postoperative days 2, shorter working channel establishment and surgical duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in intraoperative fluoroscopy dose or complication rates (P > 0.05). In conclusion, while both techniques are safe and effective, the modified skin-fixed tracer technique offers advantages in reducing surgical trauma, significantly shortening the surgical duration, decreasing intraoperative blood loss, and promoting early recovery.

改良示踪固定技术在骨科机器人辅助下经皮椎体成形术治疗k mmell病中的安全性和临床疗效。
骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的发病率不断上升,这增加了对机器人辅助经皮椎体成形术(PVP)等精确治疗的需求,特别是对于像k mmell病这样需要高手术精度的疾病。然而,传统的示踪固定方法存在一定的局限性。本研究旨在比较改良示踪固定技术与传统固定方法在机器人辅助经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗k mmell病中的安全性和临床疗效。对2023年4月至2024年1月期间接受治疗的88例患者进行回顾性分析。根据示踪剂固定方法将患者分为改良组(皮肤固定,47例)和传统组(棘突固定,41例)。观察VAS、ODI、Cobb角、工作通道建立时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视剂量、并发症发生率。两组术后第2、6个月VAS、ODI、Cobb角均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。综上所述,两种技术都是安全有效的,改良的皮肤固定示踪技术在减少手术创伤、显著缩短手术时间、减少术中出血量、促进早期恢复等方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信