Assessing male and female clinicians' intentions for a third child in China: A cross-sectional survey analysis with gender-specific insights.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dandan Zhang, Fen Liu, Tianxin Cui, Xinqi Zhuang, Jianzhong Zhang, Xiaoyu Lei, Yin-Ping Zhang
{"title":"Assessing male and female clinicians' intentions for a third child in China: A cross-sectional survey analysis with gender-specific insights.","authors":"Dandan Zhang, Fen Liu, Tianxin Cui, Xinqi Zhuang, Jianzhong Zhang, Xiaoyu Lei, Yin-Ping Zhang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As fertility rates decline and population ageing intensifies, the conflict between career and childbearing continues to impact clinicians, especially women. Exploring gender differences in the fertility intentions of male and female clinicians could help with identifying barriers to childbearing, developing effective policies to support work-life balance, and addressing the gap in research on gender disparities in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey among health care personnel in Chinese public hospitals. Through cluster sampling from highly active WeChat groups, we gathered 698 responses from clinicians to the third fertility intention questionnaire online. We then used descriptive statistics and χ<sup>2</sup> tests for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men (28.28%) had higher intentions of having a third child than women (20.71%) (P = 0.013). In terms of reasons, female clinicians were more concerned than male clinicians about the impact on their career development (P = 0.002), difficulties in job hunting (P = 0.039), and physical injuries caused by multiple births (P < 0.001), and whether the elderly can help (P = 0.001). Conversely, men's apprehensions centred on economic factors such as real house costs (P < 0.001), policy support (P = 0.036), and wives' disagreement (P < 0.001). In discussing governmental interventions, men showed a higher level of interest in policies related to child care (P < 0.001), employment stability for women (P < 0.001), extended maternity leave (P < 0.001), and financial assistance than women (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show substantial gender-specific differences in third-child fertility intentions among clinicians. To address this, the government should consider divisions in family roles, future societal needs, and women's career development. Policies should focus on balancing work and family by offering affordable childcare, flexible parenting leave, financial incentives, and career support, ensuring childbirth does not negatively impact women's professional growth, and fostering gender equality in parenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04001"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As fertility rates decline and population ageing intensifies, the conflict between career and childbearing continues to impact clinicians, especially women. Exploring gender differences in the fertility intentions of male and female clinicians could help with identifying barriers to childbearing, developing effective policies to support work-life balance, and addressing the gap in research on gender disparities in this field.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among health care personnel in Chinese public hospitals. Through cluster sampling from highly active WeChat groups, we gathered 698 responses from clinicians to the third fertility intention questionnaire online. We then used descriptive statistics and χ2 tests for analysis.

Results: Men (28.28%) had higher intentions of having a third child than women (20.71%) (P = 0.013). In terms of reasons, female clinicians were more concerned than male clinicians about the impact on their career development (P = 0.002), difficulties in job hunting (P = 0.039), and physical injuries caused by multiple births (P < 0.001), and whether the elderly can help (P = 0.001). Conversely, men's apprehensions centred on economic factors such as real house costs (P < 0.001), policy support (P = 0.036), and wives' disagreement (P < 0.001). In discussing governmental interventions, men showed a higher level of interest in policies related to child care (P < 0.001), employment stability for women (P < 0.001), extended maternity leave (P < 0.001), and financial assistance than women (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings show substantial gender-specific differences in third-child fertility intentions among clinicians. To address this, the government should consider divisions in family roles, future societal needs, and women's career development. Policies should focus on balancing work and family by offering affordable childcare, flexible parenting leave, financial incentives, and career support, ensuring childbirth does not negatively impact women's professional growth, and fostering gender equality in parenting.

评估中国男性和女性临床医生对第三胎的意图:一项具有性别特异性见解的横断面调查分析。
背景:随着生育率下降和人口老龄化加剧,职业与生育之间的冲突继续影响着临床医生,特别是妇女。探讨男性和女性临床医生生育意愿的性别差异有助于识别生育障碍,制定有效的政策来支持工作与生活的平衡,并解决该领域性别差异研究的差距。方法:对全国公立医院卫生保健人员进行横断面调查。通过对高活跃的微信群体进行整群抽样,我们收集了698名临床医生对第三次生育意愿在线问卷的回答。然后我们使用描述性统计和χ2检验进行分析。结果:男性(28.28%)比女性(20.71%)有更高的生育意愿(P = 0.013)。原因方面,女性临床医生比男性临床医生更关注多胎生育对职业发展的影响(P = 0.002)、求职困难(P = 0.039)和身体伤害(P)。结论:临床医生在三胎生育意愿上存在明显的性别差异。为了解决这个问题,政府应该考虑家庭角色的划分、未来的社会需求和女性的职业发展。政策应侧重于平衡工作和家庭,提供负担得起的托儿服务、灵活的育儿假、经济激励和职业支持,确保生育不会对女性的职业发展产生负面影响,并促进育儿中的性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信