Xiaohong Xiang, Jingwei Hu, Rangui Sachu, Chonghua Gao, Hongyan Niu, Yi Gao, Shiju Chen, Xiaotian Cui, Xiang Li
{"title":"Epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaohong Xiang, Jingwei Hu, Rangui Sachu, Chonghua Gao, Hongyan Niu, Yi Gao, Shiju Chen, Xiaotian Cui, Xiang Li","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02727-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing debate about the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in treating food allergies. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EPIT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched international trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov), PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from the inception of the database until June 25, 2023. Two authors independently screened potential studies based on the following criteria: food allergy, epidermal immunotherapy, and randomized controlled trials(RCTs). The risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. The primary outcomes included desensitization, local adverse events, systemic adverse events, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes included epinephrine utilization, topical medication utilization, and severe adverse events. We assessed certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 1970 participants were included. Ten high-quality RCTs focusing on peanut allergy and cow's milk allergy were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that EPIT promoted desensitization in patients with food allergy (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.72-2.58; I <sup>2</sup> = 0%, high certainty), particularly in aged ≤ 11 years (RR 3.84, 95% CI 2.39-6.26; I <sup>2</sup> = 34%). Additionally, treatment duration ≥ 52 weeks was found to increase immune tolerance (RR 3.37, 95% CI 2.39-4.75; I <sup>2</sup> = 13%). Patients who undergo EPIT treatment not only raised the local adverse reactions (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.10-2.41; I <sup>2</sup> = 82%, low certainty) but also raised systemic adverse reactions (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; I <sup>2</sup> = 0%, high certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After EPIT treatment, patients with food allergy can effectively increase their immune tolerance to food. However, it also significantly increases mild-to-moderate anaphylaxis. There is limited data on the impact of EPIT on quality of life and other food allergic diseases, indicating a need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02727-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is ongoing debate about the safety and efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in treating food allergies. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EPIT.
Methods: We systematically searched international trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov), PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from the inception of the database until June 25, 2023. Two authors independently screened potential studies based on the following criteria: food allergy, epidermal immunotherapy, and randomized controlled trials(RCTs). The risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. The primary outcomes included desensitization, local adverse events, systemic adverse events, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes included epinephrine utilization, topical medication utilization, and severe adverse events. We assessed certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach.
Results: Ten studies involving 1970 participants were included. Ten high-quality RCTs focusing on peanut allergy and cow's milk allergy were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that EPIT promoted desensitization in patients with food allergy (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.72-2.58; I 2 = 0%, high certainty), particularly in aged ≤ 11 years (RR 3.84, 95% CI 2.39-6.26; I 2 = 34%). Additionally, treatment duration ≥ 52 weeks was found to increase immune tolerance (RR 3.37, 95% CI 2.39-4.75; I 2 = 13%). Patients who undergo EPIT treatment not only raised the local adverse reactions (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.10-2.41; I 2 = 82%, low certainty) but also raised systemic adverse reactions (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; I 2 = 0%, high certainty).
Conclusion: After EPIT treatment, patients with food allergy can effectively increase their immune tolerance to food. However, it also significantly increases mild-to-moderate anaphylaxis. There is limited data on the impact of EPIT on quality of life and other food allergic diseases, indicating a need for further research.
背景:关于表皮免疫疗法(EPIT)治疗食物过敏的安全性和有效性一直存在争议。系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评价EPIT的安全性和有效性。方法:从数据库建立到2023年6月25日,我们系统地检索了国际试验注册库(ClinicalTrials.gov)、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials (Central)和Web of Science。两位作者根据以下标准独立筛选了潜在的研究:食物过敏、表皮免疫治疗和随机对照试验(rct)。偏倚风险评估采用Cochrane风险-偏倚2 (ROB 2)工具进行。主要结局包括脱敏、局部不良事件、全身不良事件和生活质量。次要结局包括肾上腺素使用、局部药物使用和严重不良事件。我们通过GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。结果:纳入10项研究,涉及1970名受试者。10项高质量的花生过敏和牛奶过敏随机对照试验纳入分析。荟萃分析显示,EPIT促进食物过敏患者的脱敏(RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.72-2.58;i2 = 0%,高确定性),特别是年龄≤11岁(RR 3.84, 95% CI 2.39-6.26;i2 = 34%)。此外,治疗时间≥52周发现免疫耐受增加(RR 3.37, 95% CI 2.39-4.75;i2 = 13%)。接受EPIT治疗的患者不仅提高了局部不良反应(RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.10-2.41;i2 = 82%,低确定性),但也会增加全身不良反应(RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.28;i2 = 0%,高确定性)。结论:食物过敏患者经EPIT治疗后,可有效提高对食物的免疫耐受。然而,它也显著增加轻至中度过敏反应。关于EPIT对生活质量和其他食物过敏性疾病的影响的数据有限,表明需要进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.