Assessing Susceptibility of Grapevine Cultivars to Latent Plasmopara viticola Infections Using Molecular Disease Index.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Lujia Yang, Bingyao Chu, Jie Deng, Zhaomeng Shen, Qiuyu Sun, Xuan Lv, Jiasui Zhan, Zhanhong Ma
{"title":"Assessing Susceptibility of Grapevine Cultivars to Latent <i>Plasmopara viticola</i> Infections Using Molecular Disease Index.","authors":"Lujia Yang, Bingyao Chu, Jie Deng, Zhaomeng Shen, Qiuyu Sun, Xuan Lv, Jiasui Zhan, Zhanhong Ma","doi":"10.1094/PHYTO-10-23-0409-KC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional assessments of grapevine susceptibility to grapevine downy mildew (GDM) caused by <i>Plasmopara viticola</i> rely on the visual evaluation of leaf symptoms. In this study, we used a well-established quantitative real-time PCR TaqMan assay (real-time PCR) to quantify the number of <i>P. viticola</i> infecting 12 grapevine cultivars under controlled conditions. The molecular disease index (MDI), derived from molecular detection methods, reflects the relative abundance of pathogens in plant tissues during the latent infection phase. Our application of MDI revealed a progressive increase in latent <i>P. viticola</i> levels over time, indicating dynamic levels of latent <i>P. viticola</i> infection across the inoculation processes. We calculated the area under the disease progression curve in terms of MDI (AUDPCMDI) to evaluate the susceptibility of each cultivar to GDM. Cultivars with lower AUDPCMDI values consistently exhibited reduced pathogen establishment, suggesting higher levels of innate resistance. Correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between the visual disease index (DI) and the AUDPCMDI values (<i>r</i> = 0.790, <i>P</i> = 0.002), indicating that higher levels of latent <i>P. viticola</i> infections were associated with higher disease severity. Grapevine cultivars were clustered into distinct groupings, indicating variability in their susceptibility to the pathogen. Cultivars with similar levels of susceptibility were grouped, highlighting that the real-time PCR assay used in this study represents a robust, rapid, and standardized method for quantifying pathogens, which significantly improves the efficiency of evaluating the susceptibility of grapevine cultivars to GDM This quantitative protocol provides practical guidelines for selecting resistant cultivars and implementing effective disease management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20410,"journal":{"name":"Phytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-23-0409-KC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional assessments of grapevine susceptibility to grapevine downy mildew (GDM) caused by Plasmopara viticola rely on the visual evaluation of leaf symptoms. In this study, we used a well-established quantitative real-time PCR TaqMan assay (real-time PCR) to quantify the number of P. viticola infecting 12 grapevine cultivars under controlled conditions. The molecular disease index (MDI), derived from molecular detection methods, reflects the relative abundance of pathogens in plant tissues during the latent infection phase. Our application of MDI revealed a progressive increase in latent P. viticola levels over time, indicating dynamic levels of latent P. viticola infection across the inoculation processes. We calculated the area under the disease progression curve in terms of MDI (AUDPCMDI) to evaluate the susceptibility of each cultivar to GDM. Cultivars with lower AUDPCMDI values consistently exhibited reduced pathogen establishment, suggesting higher levels of innate resistance. Correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between the visual disease index (DI) and the AUDPCMDI values (r = 0.790, P = 0.002), indicating that higher levels of latent P. viticola infections were associated with higher disease severity. Grapevine cultivars were clustered into distinct groupings, indicating variability in their susceptibility to the pathogen. Cultivars with similar levels of susceptibility were grouped, highlighting that the real-time PCR assay used in this study represents a robust, rapid, and standardized method for quantifying pathogens, which significantly improves the efficiency of evaluating the susceptibility of grapevine cultivars to GDM This quantitative protocol provides practical guidelines for selecting resistant cultivars and implementing effective disease management strategies.

利用分子疾病指数评估葡萄栽培品种对潜伏 Plasmopara viticola 感染的敏感性。
传统的葡萄对葡萄霜霉病(GDM)易感性评估依赖于叶片症状的视觉评价。在本研究中,我们使用了一种成熟的实时荧光定量PCR TaqMan (real-time PCR)方法,对12个葡萄品种在控制条件下感染葡萄假单胞菌的数量进行了定量分析。分子疾病指数(MDI)是通过分子检测方法得出的,反映了植物潜伏感染阶段病原菌在组织中的相对丰度。我们的MDI应用显示,随着时间的推移,潜伏的葡萄假单胞菌水平逐渐增加,表明在接种过程中潜伏的葡萄假单胞菌感染的动态水平。我们根据MDI (AUDPCMDI)计算了疾病进展曲线下的面积,以评估每个品种对GDM的易感性。AUDPCMDI值较低的品种普遍表现出较低的病原菌建立,表明其先天抗性水平较高。相关性分析显示,视觉疾病指数(DI)与AUDPCMDI值之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.790, P = 0.002),表明葡萄假单抗潜伏感染水平越高,疾病严重程度越高。葡萄品种被分成不同的组,表明它们对病原菌的易感性存在差异。对具有相似敏感性的品种进行分组,强调本研究中使用的实时PCR方法是一种稳健、快速和标准化的病原体定量方法,可显著提高葡萄品种对GDM的敏感性评估效率。该定量方案为选择抗性品种和实施有效的疾病管理策略提供了实用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phytopathology
Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytopathology publishes articles on fundamental research that advances understanding of the nature of plant diseases, the agents that cause them, their spread, the losses they cause, and measures that can be used to control them. Phytopathology considers manuscripts covering all aspects of plant diseases including bacteriology, host-parasite biochemistry and cell biology, biological control, disease control and pest management, description of new pathogen species description of new pathogen species, ecology and population biology, epidemiology, disease etiology, host genetics and resistance, mycology, nematology, plant stress and abiotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins, and virology. Papers dealing mainly with taxonomy, such as descriptions of new plant pathogen taxa are acceptable if they include plant disease research results such as pathogenicity, host range, etc. Taxonomic papers that focus on classification, identification, and nomenclature below the subspecies level may also be submitted to Phytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信