Efficacy and safety of Cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and Injury: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Ahmed Ali E Al Abdullah, Salem Ahmed S Alshehri, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Omar Ayed Alanazi, Safa Isa Alkhayyat, Bipin Chaurasia, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and Injury: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Ahmed Ali E Al Abdullah, Salem Ahmed S Alshehri, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Omar Ayed Alanazi, Safa Isa Alkhayyat, Bipin Chaurasia, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord ischemia and injury pose significant challenges in spinal surgery and traumatic events. Cerebrospinal drains are considered a potential intervention to mitigate these risks, although their efficacy and safety are uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies assessing the use of cerebrospinal drains in patients undergoing aortic surgeries. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The systematic review identified 34 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis conducted using open meta-analyst software revealed a significant effect of cerebrospinal drains on preventing spinal cord ischemia spinal cord injury The pooled odds ratio (OR) in double-arm studies was estimated to be 0.457 (95% CI: 0.275, 0.760). Additionally, the pooled estimate of single-arm studies was estimated to be 0.050 (95% CI: 0.036, 0.065). However, minimal heterogeneity was observed across studies.Cerebrospinal drains may play a role in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury, but further research is required to confirm their efficacy and safety. Additional well-designed studies are needed to determine the optimal use of cerebrospinal drains in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03168-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal cord ischemia and injury pose significant challenges in spinal surgery and traumatic events. Cerebrospinal drains are considered a potential intervention to mitigate these risks, although their efficacy and safety are uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies assessing the use of cerebrospinal drains in patients undergoing aortic surgeries. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The systematic review identified 34 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis conducted using open meta-analyst software revealed a significant effect of cerebrospinal drains on preventing spinal cord ischemia spinal cord injury The pooled odds ratio (OR) in double-arm studies was estimated to be 0.457 (95% CI: 0.275, 0.760). Additionally, the pooled estimate of single-arm studies was estimated to be 0.050 (95% CI: 0.036, 0.065). However, minimal heterogeneity was observed across studies.Cerebrospinal drains may play a role in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and injury, but further research is required to confirm their efficacy and safety. Additional well-designed studies are needed to determine the optimal use of cerebrospinal drains in clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信